competitor-alternatives
Skill337 starsChanged 5 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' or 'competitive landing pages.' Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. Emphasizes deep research, modular content architecture, and varied section types beyond feature tables.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. 10 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
10
Common
Most of the 44 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 15
If .claude/product-marketing-context.md exists, read it before asking questions.
- Common: line 17
Before creating competitor pages, understand:
- Common: line 30
Search volume for competitor terms
- Common: line 45
Don't misrepresent competitor features
- Common: line 150
Start every page with a quick summary for scanners—key differences in 2-3 sentences.
- Common: line 174
Create a single source of truth for each competitor with:
- Common: line 201
Quarterly: Verify pricing, check for major feature changes
- Common: line 221
Create hub page linking to all competitor content
- Common: line 224
Consider FAQ schema for common questions like "What is the best alternative to [Competitor]?"
- Common: line 244
Do you have customer quotes about switching?
- Common: line 246
Do you offer migration support?
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 44 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Competitor & Alternative Pages
You are an expert in creating competitor comparison and alternative pages. Your goal is to build pages that rank for competitive search terms, provide genuine value to evaluators, and position your product effectively.
Initial Assessment
Check for product marketing context first:
If .claude/product-marketing-context.md exists, read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.
Before creating competitor pages, understand:
- Your Product
- Core value proposition
- Key differentiators
- Ideal customer profile
- Pricing model
- Strengths and honest weaknesses
- Competitive Landscape
- Direct competitors
- Indirect/adjacent competitors
- Market positioning of each
- Search volume for competitor terms
- Goals
- SEO traffic capture
- Sales enablement
- Conversion from competitor users
- Brand positioning
Core Principles
1. Honesty Builds Trust
- Acknowledge competitor strengths
- Be accurate about your limitations
- Don't misrepresent competitor features
- Readers are comparing—they'll verify claims
2. Depth Over Surface
- Go beyond feature checklists
- Explain why differences matter
- Include use cases and scenarios
- Show, don't just tell
3. Help Them Decide
- Different tools fit different needs
- Be clear about who you're best for
- Be clear about who competitor is best for
- Reduce evaluation friction
4. Modular Content Architecture
- Competitor data should be centralized
- Updates propagate to all pages
- Single source of truth per competitor
Page Formats
Format 1: [Competitor] Alternative (Singular)
Search intent: User is actively looking to switch from a specific competitor
URL pattern: /alternatives/[competitor] or /[competitor]-alternative
Target keywords: "[Competitor] alternative", "alternative to [Competitor]", "switch from [Competitor]"
Page structure:
- Why people look for alternatives (validate their pain)
- Summary: You as the alternative (quick positioning)
- Detailed comparison (features, service, pricing)
- Who should switch (and who shouldn't)
- Migration path
- Social proof from switchers
- CTA
Format 2: [Competitor] Alternatives (Plural)
Search intent: User is researching options, earlier in journey
URL pattern: /alternatives/[competitor]-alternatives
Target keywords: "[Competitor] alternatives", "best [Competitor] alternatives", "tools like [Competitor]"
Page structure:
- Why people look for alternatives (common pain points)
- What to look for in an alternative (criteria framework)
- List of alternatives (you first, but include real options)
- Comparison table (summary)
- Detailed breakdown of each alternative
- Recommendation by use case
- CTA
Important: Include 4-7 real alternatives. Being genuinely helpful builds trust and ranks better.
Format 3: You vs [Competitor]
Search intent: User is directly comparing you to a specific competitor
URL pattern: /vs/[competitor] or /compare/[you]-vs-[competitor]
Target keywords: "[You] vs [Competitor]", "[Competitor] vs [You]"
Page structure:
- TL;DR summary (key differences in 2-3 sentences)
- At-a-glance comparison table
- Detailed comparison by category (Features, Pricing, Support, Ease of use, Integrations)
- Who [You] is best for
- Who [Competitor] is best for (be honest)
- What customers say (testimonials from switchers)
- Migration support
- CTA
Format 4: [Competitor A] vs [Competitor B]
Search intent: User comparing two competitors (not you directly)
URL pattern: /compare/[competitor-a]-vs-[competitor-b]
Page structure:
- Overview of both products
- Comparison by category
- Who each is best for
- The third option (introduce yourself)
- Comparison table (all three)
- CTA
Why this works: Captures search traffic for competitor terms, positions you as knowledgeable.
Essential Sections
TL;DR Summary
Start every page with a quick summary for scanners—key differences in 2-3 sentences.
Paragraph Comparisons
Go beyond tables. For each dimension, write a paragraph explaining the differences and when each matters.
Feature Comparison
For each category: describe how each handles it, list strengths and limitations, give bottom line recommendation.
Pricing Comparison
Include tier-by-tier comparison, what's included, hidden costs, and total cost calculation for sample team size.
Who It's For
Be explicit about ideal customer for each option. Honest recommendations build trust.
Migration Section
Cover what transfers, what needs reconfiguration, support offered, and quotes from customers who switched.
For detailed templates: See references/templates.md
Content Architecture
Centralized Competitor Data
Create a single source of truth for each competitor with:
- Positioning and target audience
- Pricing (all tiers)
- Feature ratings
- Strengths and weaknesses
- Best for / not ideal for
- Common complaints (from reviews)
- Migration notes
For data structure and examples: See references/content-architecture.md
Research Process
Deep Competitor Research
For each competitor, gather:
- Product research: Sign up, use it, document features/UX/limitations
- Pricing research: Current pricing, what's included, hidden costs
- Review mining: G2, Capterra, TrustRadius for common praise/complaint themes
- Customer feedback: Talk to customers who switched (both directions)
- Content research: Their positioning, their comparison pages, their changelog
Ongoing Updates
- Quarterly: Verify pricing, check for major feature changes
- When notified: Customer mentions competitor change
- Annually: Full refresh of all competitor data
SEO Considerations
Keyword Targeting
| Format | Primary Keywords |
| Alternative (singular) | [Competitor] alternative, alternative to [Competitor] |
| Alternatives (plural) | [Competitor] alternatives, best [Competitor] alternatives |
| You vs Competitor | [You] vs [Competitor], [Competitor] vs [You] |
| Competitor vs Competitor | [A] vs [B], [B] vs [A] |
Internal Linking
- Link between related competitor pages
- Link from feature pages to relevant comparisons
- Create hub page linking to all competitor content
Schema Markup
Consider FAQ schema for common questions like "What is the best alternative to [Competitor]?"
Output Format
Competitor Data File
Complete competitor profile in YAML format for use across all comparison pages.
Page Content
For each page: URL, meta tags, full page copy organized by section, comparison tables, CTAs.
Page Set Plan
Recommended pages to create with priority order based on search volume.
Task-Specific Questions
- What are common reasons people switch to you?
- Do you have customer quotes about switching?
- What's your pricing vs. competitors?
- Do you offer migration support?
Related Skills
- programmatic-seo: For building competitor pages at scale
- copywriting: For writing compelling comparison copy
- seo-audit: For optimizing competitor pages
- schema-markup: For FAQ and comparison schema
Other versions48 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 3
- whyujjwal/claude-marketing★ 17100% same
- computer-agents/skills★ 2100% same
- florattu/claude-skills★ 0100% same
Edited · 42
- TheCraigHewitt/seomachine★ 7.5k99% same
- yoopta-editor/Yoopta-Editor★ 3.1k99% same
- LeoYeAI/openclaw-marketing-skills★ 1k94% same
- mysticaltech/marketingskills★ 352100% same
- b1rdmania/ghostclaw★ 9193% same
- robertbstillwell/marketing-skills★ 2699% same
- ukunal91app/Marketing-Skills-by-Corey-Haines★ 2693% same
- wpgaurav/WordPress-skills★ 1990% same
- Hassaan146/claude-skills★ 1869% same
- osabiohq/osabio★ 1593% same
32 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 3
- MoizIbnYousaf/marketing-cli★ 33same name
- GTMify/aigtm★ 25same name
- docaohieu2808/claude-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use aso-audit, product-marketing-context and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
ai-vitaSkillaso-audit
When the user wants to audit or optimize an App Store or Google Play listing. Also use when the user mentions 'ASO audit,' 'app store optimization,' 'optimize my app listing,' 'improve app visibility,' 'app store ranking,' 'audit my listing,' 'why aren't people downloading my app,' 'improve my app conversion,' 'keyword optimization for app,' or 'compare my app to competitors.' Use when the user shares an App Store or Google Play URL and wants to improve it.
Also in 8 projects that use this
xfstudioSkillproduct-marketing-context
When the user wants to create or update their product marketing context document. Also use when the user mentions 'product context,' 'marketing context,' 'set up context,' 'positioning,' or wants to avoid repeating foundational information across marketing tasks. Creates `.claude/product-marketing-context.md` that other marketing skills reference.
Also in 20 projects that use this
ukunal91appSkillrevops
When the user wants help with revenue operations, lead lifecycle management, or marketing-to-sales handoff processes. Also use when the user mentions 'RevOps,' 'revenue operations,' 'lead scoring,' 'lead routing,' 'MQL,' 'SQL,' 'pipeline stages,' 'deal desk,' 'CRM automation,' 'marketing-to-sales handoff,' 'data hygiene,' 'leads aren't getting to sales,' 'pipeline management,' 'lead qualification,' or 'when should marketing hand off to sales.' Use this for anything involving the systems and processes that connect marketing to revenue. For cold outreach emails, see cold-email. For email drip campaigns, see email-sequence. For pricing decisions, see pricing-strategy.
Also in 23 projects that use this
VercelSkillsite-architecture
Use when planning or restructuring what pages a site has and how they connect: hierarchy, navigation, URL patterns, breadcrumbs, and internal linking. Not for XML sitemaps, which are in seo-audit.
Also in 23 projects that use this
buildingwithaiSkillsales-enablement
Master world-class sales enablement from foundations to execution. Build comprehensive enablement programs, develop effective training and coaching systems, implement data-driven content strategies, leverage AI and modern technology stacks, establish cross-functional collaboration, measure ROI with precision, and drive revenue growth. Covers sales methodologies (MEDDIC, SPICED, BANT), maturity models (Forrester, Gartner), enablement frameworks, change management, remote enablement, market segment strategies (SMB, Mid-Market, Enterprise), and team building. Based on 2024-2025 industry research from Gartner, Forrester, Product Marketing Alliance, Sales Enablement Collective, and leading practitioners.
Also in 20 projects that use this
ukunal91appSkillad-creative
When the user wants to generate, iterate, or scale ad creative — headlines, descriptions, primary text, or full ad variations — for any paid advertising platform. Also use when the user mentions 'ad copy variations,' 'ad creative,' 'generate headlines,' 'RSA headlines,' 'bulk ad copy,' 'ad iterations,' 'creative testing,' 'ad performance optimization,' 'write me some ads,' 'Facebook ad copy,' 'Google ad headlines,' 'LinkedIn ad text,' or 'I need more ad variations.' Use this whenever someone needs to produce ad copy at scale or iterate on existing ads. For campaign strategy and targeting, see paid-ads. For landing page copy, see copywriting.
Also in 24 projects that use this
- +5 more from ukunal91app
In this repository70 other files it gives its agents.
- vercel-react-best-practices/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- adversarial-reviewSkill
- analytics-trackingSkill
- animejsSkill
- apple-designSkill
- app-store-screenshotsSkill
- beam-glow-statesSkill
- beautiful-shadowsSkill
- better-accessibilitySkill
- better-colorsSkill
- better-interfaceSkill
- better-layoutSkill
- better-typographySkill
- better-uiSkill
- better-writingSkill
- conductor-rewrite-performanceSkill
- container-linesSkill
- content-strategySkill
- contribute-catalogSkill
- copy-editingSkill
- copywritingSkill
- corner-diagonalsSkill
- css-animationsSkill
- css-border-gradientSkill
- documentary-brutalist-agencySkill
- editorial-portfolio-chaptersSkill
- emil-design-engSkill
- framed-grid-layoutSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- glass-dark-uiSkill
- gsapSkill
- hyperframes-cliSkill
- hyperframes-mediaSkill
- hyperframes-registrySkill
- hyperframesSkill
- impeccableSkill
- interface-reviewSkill
- landing-pageSkill
- linear-local-first-architectureSkill
- liquid-metal-borderSkill
- lottieSkill
- mesh-gradient-dark-blue-cleanSkill
- minimal-zine-posterSkill
- ogilvy-copywritingSkill
- operational-enterprise-aiSkill
- page-croSkill
- pricing-pageSkill
- product-proof-saasSkill
- programmatic-seoSkill
- progressive-blurSkill
- remotion-to-hyperframesSkill
- reveal-hover-effectSkill
- schema-markupSkill
- seo-auditSkill
- service-booking-flowSkill
- shaders-cursor-ripplesSkill
- skeuomorphic-uiSkill
- staggered-word-revealSkill
- stop-slopSkill
- tailwindSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

