agentleFS
bookchaowalitbookchaowalit/platform-agent-skills/ux-review/SKILL.md

ux-review

Skill0 starsChanged 9 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Audit and fix the UX of a running web app end to end with evidence — route sweep, role and persona flows, page review at every width, interaction states, accessibility, Thai copy, data consistency, a fix loop and a production re-check. Use when asked to review, audit or polish a product's UX or UI, before or after release, or when users found a UI problem tests missed. Not for PRDs or new flows (product-management), new visual design (impeccable) or test strategy (qa-testing).

23 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 21 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Run the phases in order. Each phase has inputs, steps, pass criteria and outputs in the linked reference.

    line 15
  2. Distinctive:

    One finding means a whole-page review: if one finding is reported (by the owner, a client or a tool), review the whole page and every page …

    line 58
  3. Distinctive:

    Production: never create accounts or data, or pay, on production.

    line 68
  4. Distinctive:

    Numbers: never change a calculation to make a page look right.

    line 70

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 21 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

UX Review

Find what a real user would trip over, prove it with screenshots and numbers, fix what is clearly a defect, and hand the owner a short list of real decisions. Automated checks and tests narrow the search; only looking at the rendered page closes it.

Workflow

Run the phases in order. Each phase has inputs, steps, pass criteria and outputs in the linked reference. Skip a phase only when the owner says so, and record the skip.

  1. Set up (P0): environment, accounts per role, test data, widths, and the evidence folder. Production stays read-only. See references/phases-discovery.md.
  2. Map the product from code (P1–P2): roles, routes, permissions, and main use cases as business outcomes, with implemented/partial/proposed status. Personas only where code shows them.
  3. Sweep every route (P3–P4): every route × role × width for status, errors, overflow and access, plus an authorization matrix of role × page × action × API.
  4. Walk the flows (P5–P6): as-is and to-be Mermaid flows per persona and use case, then run each flow step in a browser at phone and desktop width. Record the main flows per role as videos with ../flow-video/ for the owner and handover.
  5. Review every page (P7): section by section at 320/375/768/1024/1440 with ../qa-testing/scripts/ui_review.mjs, against references/page-checklist.md. Open every screenshot slice. Main use cases also run in WebKit and Firefox and on emulated phones (--browser, --device). With a baseline (--baseline), start with the changed regions.
  6. Check interaction states (P8): hover, focus, active, disabled, loading, empty, error, success, dialogs, menus, toasts and forms. Use scripts/ui_states.mjs and references/interaction-states.md.
  7. Check accessibility and performance (P8b): axe-core WCAG findings on every capture, mobile Core Web Vitals and JS bytes with --perf mobile, and the keyboard and screen-reader checks that tools cannot do.
  8. Check content (P9): Thai copy, terminology, and leaks of demo, sample, test or placeholder text, including text from the API and seed data.
  9. Check data and figures (P10): each figure has one home, precision is consistent, numbers agree across pages and with the API, and calculations reconcile. See references/data-and-figures.md.
  10. Score (P11): heuristic and IA findings with severity, linked to the flows and pages where they occur.
  11. Fix loop (P12): fix bugs and clear UX defects, re-run the affected phases, keep before/after evidence, and list owner decisions without changing them.
  12. Release and re-check (P13): sign off with ../qa-testing/scripts/ui_signoff.py --promote-baseline, ship through the release gate, then repeat P3, P7, P8 and P8b on the live URL against the baseline.

Report with references/report-format.md.

Decision rules

  • What counts as reviewed: a page is reviewed only when every section was looked at at every width in scope. "Scanned", "no overflow" or "tests pass" do not count.
  • One finding means a whole-page review: if one finding is reported (by the owner, a client or a tool), review the whole page and every page that renders the same components.
  • What you fix:
    • A defect (broken, unreadable, wrong, inconsistent with the product's own rules) gets fixed.
    • A business choice goes on the owner list with options and a recommendation: menu order, pricing, legal text, role names, feature removal.
  • Text from the API or seed data: fix it at the source repository and say so. Do not patch it over in the UI.
  • Production: never create accounts or data, or pay, on production. Use local or staging for anything that writes.
  • Numbers: never change a calculation to make a page look right. A figure that disagrees across pages is a defect to trace, not to hide.
  • Splitting work: delegate a phase only with a brief that names pages, widths, evidence paths and pass criteria. Check the returned screenshots yourself before accepting the result.

Resources

  • references/phases-discovery.md covers P0–P6: setup, product map, personas, sitemap, authorization, flows and flow tests. Read it when starting a review.
  • references/phases-quality.md covers P7–P13: page review, states, accessibility and performance (P8b), content, data, scoring, the fix loop and the production re-check.
  • references/page-checklist.md has the measurable section-by-section criteria for P7.
  • references/interaction-states.md has the state matrix and contrast rules for P8.
  • references/data-and-figures.md has the figure inventory and reconciliation for P10.
  • references/production-test-accounts.md: rules for read-only review accounts and sessions on production. Read it before any logged-in live check.
  • references/report-format.md sets the evidence folder layout, IDs, severities, CSV columns and summary.
  • scripts/ui_states.mjs forces hover, focus and active on every control and measures contrast and focus visibility.
  • ../qa-testing/scripts/ui_review.mjs, ui_signoff.py and ui_review_gate.py handle capture, page audit, sign-off and the release gate. ui_review.mjs also runs the visual baseline diff, axe-core and the mobile performance pass. Browser and device setup is in ../qa-testing/references/browsers-and-tools.md.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.