project-management
Skill0 starsChanged 8 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Run the Project Manager / Delivery Manager role for Solo Empire projects and client engagements — charter and authority, linked baseline (scope, schedule, cost, quality) with tolerances, WBS and resourcing, milestones and phase gates, RAID, a rated status report on a fixed cadence, change control against the baseline, external-party and vendor tracking, and closeout with final variance and lessons. Use when starting, planning, tracking, reporting on, escalating, re-baselining, or closing a project or engagement. Not for what to build or KPIs (product-management), backlog ordering and story acceptance (product-owner), requirements detail (business-analysis), or estimating effort (ai-native-estimation).
24 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- fx/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- danieleteti/delphimvcframeworktheir own version, first seen Nov 2, 2026
- ldicarlo1/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Dev-KAIDO/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- KMaruthi2002/universal-llm-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- zpower426/pmpowerstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
Other versions24 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 24
- kunchenguid/firstmate★ 8.7ksame name
- dotnet/msbuild★ 5.6ksame name
- danieleteti/delphimvcframework★ 1.4ksame name
- vivy-yi/xiaohongshu-skills★ 455same name
- typv/nest-turbo-starter★ 224same name
- vanillagreencom/kendex★ 76same name
- CheehooLabs/SpureeSkills★ 18same name
- superuser-pal/awesome-second-brain★ 14same name
- peterbamuhigire/proposal-skills★ 8same name
- fx/skills★ 4same name
14 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository27 other files it gives its agents.
- ai-agentsSkill
- ai-agent-workflowsSkill
- ai-native-estimationSkill
- ai-product-deliverySkill
- book-dev-engineering-loopSkill
- business-analysisSkill
- client-discovery-and-proposalsSkill
- content-distributionSkill
- data-engineeringSkill
- flow-videoSkill
- game-engineeringSkill
- govern-ai-skillsSkill
- graphic-designSkill
- lead-research-and-crmSkill
- main-only-developmentSkill
- product-managementSkill
- product-ownerSkill
- qa-testingSkill
- security-and-privacySkill
- skill-templateSkill
- solo-empire-operatorSkill
- solution-architectureSkill
- subagent-orchestrationSkill
- system-docpackSkill
- unused-file-cleanupSkill
- ux-reviewSkill
- xr-engineeringSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 22 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Keep a bounded project on its approved baseline, make its status honest and visible, and close it with evidence.
- Distinctive: line 63
Keep the evidence trail complete for outsourced and client work: decisions, approvals, minutes, and acceptance records with dates.
- Distinctive: line 65
Do not duplicate other roles' artifacts.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 22 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Project Management
Keep a bounded project on its approved baseline, make its status honest and visible, and close it with evidence.
Workflow
- Establish context: the owner and sponsor, client or internal, contract or
SOW, the system's docpack, and the live task source. Open or create the
control record from architecture-docs
templates/positions/project-delivery-manager/project-control-record.md; it links every detailed artifact below rather than copying them. - Initiate: write
templates/sdlc/project-charter.md(objective, scope, authority, sponsor, constraints) and get it approved. Client work starts fromtemplates/roles/engagement-delivery/engagement-kickoff.md. - Plan the baseline:
- scope from the BA requirements baseline (
business-analysis); - WBS and resources with
templates/sdlc/wbs-and-resource-plan.md; - effort and dates from
ai-native-estimation(ranges, critical path, wait time); - milestones, gates, and RAID with
templates/development-cycle/delivery-plan-and-raid.md; - cadence and audiences with
templates/sdlc/communication-plan.md. Set a tolerance per dimension (scope, schedule, cost, quality). Mark dates that are not approved [ต้องยืนยัน].
- scope from the BA requirements baseline (
- Track: on the stated cadence, update forecast against baseline, the RAID
items rated high or due soon, and the milestone table. Outsourced or
vendor work goes in
templates/sdlc/external-parties/(milestone and deliverable tracker, delay and dependency log). - Report status with
templates/roles/engagement-delivery/delivery-status-review.mdand add a row to the control record. Rate with the written rule: green inside tolerance, amber outside with a recovery plan, red outside without one or when a sponsor decision is needed. Every decision needed has an owner and a date. - Change control: any change to scope, schedule, or cost beyond tolerance
needs a change record
(
templates/roles/engagement-delivery/delivery-change-record.md, or the BAchange-request.mdfor requirements) and an approval before the baseline moves. Then update the RTM, plan, and estimate. - Gates: run each phase gate with
templates/sdlc/phase-gate-record.md; readiness and acceptance use the engagement-deliveryreadiness-review.mdandacceptance-plan.md. Record minutes withtemplates/sdlc/meeting-minutes.md. - Close: accepted deliverables, final variance against baseline, handoff
(
final-handoff.md), lessons learned, estimate calibration back toai-native-estimation, and open items moved to the backlog with a new owner.
Decision rules
- Report what is true. Never show green to avoid a hard conversation; a missed date or a blocked item is amber or red until recovered.
- The baseline moves only through an approved change. Silent re-planning is a defect.
- Spending, contract scope, external messages, delay notices to clients, and vendor escalation are owner decisions; draft them, do not send them.
- Keep the evidence trail complete for outsourced and client work: decisions, approvals, minutes, and acceptance records with dates.
- Do not duplicate other roles' artifacts. Link the BA baseline, the PO backlog and acceptance record, the SA design, and the QA evidence.
Handoff
Report the control record version, baseline versions and approvers, the current rating per dimension with variance, high RAID items with owners, open change records, next gate and its readiness, decisions needed with owner and date, and closeout status when the project ends.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

