data-engineering
Skill0 starsChanged 7 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Design, implement, review, and operate governed Solo Empire data products and lake-first pipelines. Use for source intake, ingestion, Parquet or Iceberg, schemas and contracts, quality, lineage, replay or backfill, access, retention, release, incidents, or deprecation; do not use for generic database CRUD or AI-agent orchestration without a data-product boundary.
21 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- juninmd/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- AxlZero21/Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Crush-Rewards/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- newsc2/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- SwastikPandey1024/agentic-engineering-ostheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- KumailQazi/krmaazha-binance-mcptheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use infrastructure-as-code, api-documentation and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
mmondoraSkillinfrastructure-as-code
Infrastructure as Code with Terraform and Pulumi. State management, modularity, drift detection, secrets handling. Use when provisioning cloud resources, writing Terraform/Pulumi modules, or managing infrastructure configuration.
Also in 3 projects that use this
onejaejaeSkillapi-documentation
API 문서화 스킬. Notion과 Postman에 API 명세를 추가합니다. Use when documenting APIs, updating Notion database, or adding Postman requests.
Also in 3 projects that use this
AnthropicSkillsystem-design
Design systems, services, and architectures. Trigger with "design a system for", "how should we architect", "system design for", "what's the right architecture for", or when the user needs help with API design, data modeling, or service boundaries.
Also in 4 projects that use this
OpenAISkillobservability
Vercel Observability expert guidance — Drains (logs, traces, speed insights, web analytics), Web Analytics, Speed Insights, runtime logs, custom events, OpenTelemetry integration, and monitoring dashboards. Use when instrumenting, debugging, or optimizing application performance and user experience on Vercel.
Also in 4 projects that use this
VercelSkilltechnical-writing
Write, edit, review, or audit user-facing documentation for the eve repository. Use for changes under docs/, documentation tied to eve APIs or CLI behavior, docs work based on Slack or support feedback, and requests to make eve docs clearer, more natural, or less AI-patterned while verifying claims against current source, tests, CLI help, public releases, and repository conventions.
Also in 4 projects that use this
barisariburnuSkillperformance-optimization
Complete performance optimization guide for Next.js applications including frontend, backend, database, caching, and general optimization strategies. Use when improving performance, reducing bundle size, optimizing queries, or implementing caching.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions21 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 21
- magnus919/agent-skills★ 172same name
- irahardianto/awesome-agv★ 157same name
- travisjneuman/.claude★ 106same name
- d-padmanabhan/agent-engineering-handbook★ 17same name
- drewid74/ai_skills★ 8same name
- BejeweledMe/codex-pro-agent-skills★ 7same name
- Douglasst102/AgentSkills★ 4same name
- KumailQazi/krmaazha-binance-mcp★ 4same name
- thejordanleopold/claude-code-skills-distilled★ 4same name
- ffsshhttiikk/opencode-agents-skills★ 2same name
11 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository27 other files it gives its agents.
- ai-agentsSkill
- ai-agent-workflowsSkill
- ai-native-estimationSkill
- ai-product-deliverySkill
- book-dev-engineering-loopSkill
- business-analysisSkill
- client-discovery-and-proposalsSkill
- content-distributionSkill
- flow-videoSkill
- game-engineeringSkill
- govern-ai-skillsSkill
- graphic-designSkill
- lead-research-and-crmSkill
- main-only-developmentSkill
- product-managementSkill
- product-ownerSkill
- project-managementSkill
- qa-testingSkill
- security-and-privacySkill
- skill-templateSkill
- solo-empire-operatorSkill
- solution-architectureSkill
- subagent-orchestrationSkill
- system-docpackSkill
- unused-file-cleanupSkill
- ux-reviewSkill
- xr-engineeringSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 18 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 41
Never let a producer write directly into another application's operational store or silently discard invalid records.
- Distinctive: line 43
Verify source-to-target reconciliation, quality thresholds, lineage, consumer compatibility, access, retention, recovery, cost, and …
- Distinctive: line 53
Run the narrow data tests first, then repository checks when tracked files change:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 18 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Data Engineering
Turn a data request into a bounded, replayable data product with explicit ownership, contracts, quality evidence, lineage, and operating controls.
Context routing
Role, process, learning, and workspace documents (roles/, learning/, projects/,
knowledge/, quiz/) live in the bookchaowalit/knowledge-base repository, not in
this one. Read them from that checkout (set
SOLO_KNOWLEDGE_ROOT; default is the knowledge-base sibling of this checkout); the relative paths below are relative to its root.
Data-lake code lives in bookchaowalit/data-lake-pipelines (override SOLO_DATA_LAKE_ROOT).
- Always read
roles/data-engineering/README.mdfor the role boundary and gates. - Read
roles/data-engineering/PROCESS.mdfor a new or changed data product, pipeline, release, incident, or retirement. - Read
roles/data-engineering/PROCESS-REGISTER.mdonly when selecting subprocess artifacts or templates. - Read
systems/ai-data/data-lake-architecture.mdfor ingestion, lake layers, storage, streaming, or downstream projections.
Workflow
- Define the consumer decision, measurable outcome, data owner, producer, consumers, grain, source permission, privacy class, retention, volume, and freshness. Stop if ownership, permission, or permitted use is unknown.
- Select the smallest subprocess and copy only its required blank templates
from
templates/roles/data-engineering/into the owning data-product workspace; never edit a source template in place. - Preserve exact source bytes and checksum in immutable landing storage when the lake contract applies. Produce a versioned Bronze manifest before any SQLite, dashboard, API, MCP, analytics, or AI projection.
- Version schemas and contracts. Make transforms deterministic, idempotent, bounded, observable, and safe to retry, quarantine, backfill, and replay. Never let a producer write directly into another application's operational store or silently discard invalid records.
- Verify source-to-target reconciliation, quality thresholds, lineage, consumer compatibility, access, retention, recovery, cost, and rollback. A breaking contract change or production release requires accountable owner and affected-consumer approval.
- Handoff the decision, artifacts, commands, evidence, exceptions, owners, approval points, rollback/replay path, and next review. Report missing controls as gaps instead of claiming readiness.
Verification
Run the narrow data tests first, then repository checks when tracked files change:
# data-lake code lives in bookchaowalit/data-lake-pipelines; run its suite (see its README):
# cd "${SOLO_DATA_LAKE_ROOT:-../data-lake}" && for t in $(find infra/tests -name '*_test.py' | sort); do .venv/bin/python "$t" || echo "FAIL $t"; done
task contracts:check
task docs:checkDoes it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

