debrief
Skill13 starsChanged 13 days agoMITView on GitHub
Meeting and transcript processing: classifies meeting type, name corrections, extracts insights, generates protocols, proposes tasks. Full 8-phase flow (GitHub reconciliation, distribution email) or quick 5-phase. Trigger: "/debrief", "/debrief {path}", "/debrief --quick", "/debrief --all", "/debrief --date YYYY-MM-DD", "meeting minutes".
30 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- srizzon/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- kiloloop/oacp-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Works-HQ/ai-brain-starter-packtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- piotrmechlinski/executive-braintheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- pedroromeroluna/peter-braintheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- adamlinscott/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 30, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use brief, review and 1 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
AnthropicSkillbrief
Generate contextual briefings for legal work — daily summary, topic research, or incident response. Use when starting your day and need a scan of legal-relevant items across email, calendar, and contracts, when researching a specific legal question across internal sources, or when a developing situation (data breach, litigation threat, regulatory inquiry) needs rapid context.
Also in 3 projects that use this
SentrySkillreview
Fixture review skill.
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillhandoff
Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions30 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 30
- suboss87/FDEOps★ 940same name
- spacedock-dev/spacedock★ 85same name
- pedroromeroluna/peter-brain★ 9same name
- trydebrief/debrief-skills★ 4same name
- uttambharadwaj/kb-graph★ 4same name
- adamlinscott/claude-skills★ 3same name
- Works-HQ/ai-brain-starter-pack★ 3same name
- armenr/modelmux★ 2same name
- siemendev/release-process★ 2same name
- aaronwskinner/claude-skills★ 1same name
20 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository44 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/board-pilot/references/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- a2aSkill
- archiveSkill
- board-pilotSkill
- bridge-auditSkill
- bridge-contributeSkill
- bridge-curatorSkill
- bridge-explorerSkill
- bridge-greetingSkill
- bridge-leak-checkSkill
- bridge-learnSkill
- bridge-onboardSkill
- bridge-overlaySkill
- bridge-promoteSkill
- bridge-statusSkill
- bridge-syncSkill
- briefingSkill
- calendarSkill
- capability-brokerSkill
- channelSkill
- cmuxSkill
- cockpitSkill
- dashboardSkill
- doc-systemSkill
- github-projects-managerSkill
- html-canvasSkill
- html-slidesSkill
- knowledge-repo-initSkill
- mail-draftSkill
- mandantsSkill
- meeting-transcriptionSkill
- object-storeSkill
- onboard-simSkill
- remoteSkill
- scheduleSkill
- secretsSkill
- spec-kickoffSkill
- task-close-postmortemSkill
- tmuxSkill
- tracker-syncSkill
- workloadSkill
- workspaceSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 27 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 79
Read every workflow/meetings/*.yaml (skip _-prefixed files: those are the template and schema).
- Very specific: line 118
No match, or no followup_skill: continue with the normal flow, silently.
- Distinctive: line 166
If EITHER check finds something, say one line and continue — never block, never prompt:
- Very specific: line 173
When the evidence is a registry entry, name the sibling and be honest about its age — no active liveness probe is run (probing would turn a …
- Distinctive: line 179
If NEITHER check finds anything → stay silent, exactly as today.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 27 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Debrief
Process a meeting transcript. Read the referenced file ONLY when triggered.
Sources and flow variants
Sources scanned: legacy work.imports_dir plus doc_sensor.scan_paths entries with
kind: recordings (catches PARA tree 2_AREAS/Import_Audio/ after the PARA migration).
Already-archived basenames in work/archive/days/ are skipped as redundant.
Flow variants:
- Full 8-phase flow (
references/full-workflow.md) with GitHub task-reconciliation (references/task-reconciliation.md) and optional distribution email (references/distribution-email.md) to meeting participants. - Quick 5-phase flow (
references/quick-workflow.md). - Batch flags:
--allprocesses every unprocessed transcript inimports/;--date YYYY-MM-DDprocesses only that day. (Both formerly lived in/process-meeting, now merged here.)
Decision Tree
User wants to...
├── Full processing (8 phases) → Read references/full-workflow.md
├── Quick processing (5 phases) → Read references/quick-workflow.md
├── Classify a transcript only → Read references/classification.md
├── Apply name corrections → Read references/classification.md (§ Name Corrections)
├── Generate a protocol from notes → Read references/protocol-templates.md
├── Match actions to existing issues → Read references/task-reconciliation.md
│ (called from Phase 5)
├── Pull calendar/chat context for transcript → Read references/full-workflow.md § Phase 1.5
│ (driven by integrations.meeting_context.*)
├── Send meeting summary email → Read references/distribution-email.md
│ (called from Phase 7, after updates + protocol)
└── Questions about debrief → Answer from this filePhase order (hard rule)
- Find → 1.5. Context Lookup (only if any
integrations.meeting_context.*block inbridge-config.yamlis enabled withconsumers: [debrief]) → 2. Classify + corrections → 3. Extract → - (n/a — merged into 3) → 5. Task Reconciliation + Execute → 6. Protocol → 7. Distribution Email → 8. Work-log + Archive
Updates before protocol (so wiki has real URLs). Protocol before email (so email links to real issue updates AND the written wiki page). Email before archive (so transcript is still next to the workflow).
A hand-off to a successor skill happens after Phase 5, never earlier. The series is usually recognisable at Phase 1, and handing over there feels efficient. It is not: phases 1.5, 2 and 5 are then simply never run by anyone. The successor's follow-up starts further downstream and assumes they are done. See § Recurring series for the positive definition and the hand-over list.
Recurring series: recognise and hand off (do not make the user guess)
A transcript that belongs to a recurring meeting series does not end with a protocol; the series has its own cycle (a run sheet before, keyword memory after, board operations, a distribution draft, next week's skeleton). Debrief does not own any of that and must not reimplement it. It recognises the series and names the successor, so the user triggers one thing instead of four.
Purely config-driven, so this stays a generic core skill:
- Read every
workflow/meetings/*.yaml(skip_-prefixed files: those are the template and schema). - Match the meeting folder name against each series'
folder_match(a regex with a nameddategroup).folder_matchwins overfolder_pattern; real folder names diverge, and a prefix guess picks the wrong series. On a match, read that series'
followup_skill. Finish phases 1.5 through 5 first, then hand over. The point is defined positively, as "after 5", not as "somewhere before 6":This transcript belongs to {display_name} ({date}). That series' cycle is owned by
{followup_skill}: it fills the run sheet, writes the summary, the wiki protocol, the board operations and the distribution draft, and seeds the next meeting.Done here and handed over:
- classification: {type}, {n} speakers
- name corrections: {n} applied,
name_corrections: appliedset in the transcript frontmatter - extraction: {n} action items
- task reconciliation: {n} matched to existing work, {n} newly created ({slugs})
Hand over now?
[y]·[n]continue with the generic flowEvery line of that list is a claim, so every line is checked before it is printed. A hand-over that says "name corrections applied" when they were not is worse than no hand-over: the successor believes it and never looks.
Why the point is defined positively. In the case behind this rule, the hand-over was offered right after Phase 1, because the series was already recognisable. Phases 1.5, 2 and 5 were then run by nobody:
debriefwas out, and the successor's follow-up begins at "fill in the keywords" and only assumes classification, name corrections and reconciliation happened. Eighteen name corrections (one colleague's first name misheard three times, which would have reached a distribution mail) and two due work items were caught by the user, not by the flow. The failure is silent by construction: an uncorrected transcript reads perfectly fluently, and a missing work item is only noticed by someone looking for it.- No match, or no
followup_skill: continue with the normal flow, silently. Most meetings are not part of a series and a prompt would be noise.
Debrief never names a series or a skill in its own text. It reads the key.
Flow selector
| Flag | Flow | When to use |
(none) | Full 7-phase | Meetings with stakeholders, decisions, action items. Protocol required. |
--quick | Quick 5-phase | Loose notes, personal debriefs, no formal protocol needed. |
{path} | Full or quick | Path to transcript file. Flow selection via other flags. |
Both flows are checkpoint-gated — user confirms at classification and task
creation. Neither flow writes to GitHub, wiki, or archive without explicit [y].
Transcription pipeline (optional)
Debrief consumes transcripts; it does not transcribe. A transcription worker is an optional integration — never a dependency:
- No worker configured (the default): transcribe with any tool and drop the transcript (or the audio + transcript pair, same basename) into imports — the Find phase picks it up. Nothing else is required.
- Worker configured (
integrations.transcription.enabled: trueinbridge-config.yaml): Phase 0 pulls finished transcripts via thesync_scriptbefore scanning (pull), and the Find phase may hand un-transcribed audio back to the worker (push). - Fail-soft (hard rule): worker unreachable (sync script exits non-zero) → proceed with whatever is already in imports. A missing or broken worker must never block a debrief run.
- Silent vs. surfaced — these are not the same absence, do not conflate them:
integrations.transcription.enabled: false→ skip silently. A deliberate no stays a no; re-asking is nagging.The
integrations.transcriptionblock absent entirely → not a no, just no answer yet. Run TWO cheap, read-only checks before choosing silence (neither is a scan — both read something already on disk for exactly this purpose):- local — does
infra/transcriptions/topology.yamlresolve a worker (mode: remote+worker.host, ormode: local), or does async_scriptexist at the conventional path (skills/meeting-transcription/scripts/debrief_sync.sh)? - cross-instance — does
~/.bridge-capabilities/transcription.yamlcarry an entry (seedocs/capability-registry.md)? This is a sibling Bridge instance's opted-in worker on the same machine — the case that motivated this split (see issue #105/#107): a fully working worker, invisible because it was never registered here. If EITHER check finds something, say one line and continue — never block, never prompt:
Note: a transcription pipeline appears to exist on this machine but isn't registered for this bridge (
integrations.transcriptionmissing frombridge-config.yaml)./debriefcontinues without it —/bridge-onboard --add transcriptionto wire it up.When the evidence is a registry entry, name the sibling and be honest about its age — no active liveness probe is run (probing would turn a read into a scan, which the registry is explicitly designed to avoid): an entry with
registered_atolder than ~90 days gets "last confirmed {date} by {registered_by} — verify it's still running" rather than being asserted as current fact. If NEITHER check finds anything → stay silent, exactly as today. Most users have no worker; noise is worse than silence.- local — does
The full worker contract (config block, sync-script verbs, failure semantics,
output format) lives in
docs/transcription-worker.md.
Integration points
- Transcription worker (optional, bring-your-own): see § Transcription
pipeline above +
docs/transcription-worker.md. A full reference implementation ships asskills/meeting-transcription/. - process-transcription (global, if installed): owns Org-specific participant lists and wiki routing — debrief defers to it.
- github-projects-manager: governance + execution for GitHub issues created from extracted action items.
- workflow/projects/{slug}.yaml: source of truth for issue field values.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

