agentleFS
Works-HQWorks-HQ/ai-brain-starter-pack/skills/debrief/SKILL.md

debrief

Skill3 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Turn meeting or work-session notes into filed history, decisions, tasks, waiting-for items, and follow-up drafts. Use after any session worth capturing. Triggers on "debrief", "debrief this", "process these notes", and "file this meeting".

30 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use brief, review and 1 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • AnthropicSkill

    brief

    Generate contextual briefings for legal work — daily summary, topic research, or incident response. Use when starting your day and need a scan of legal-relevant items across email, calendar, and contracts, when researching a specific legal question across internal sources, or when a developing situation (data breach, litigation threat, regulatory inquiry) needs rapid context.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • SentrySkill

    review

    Fixture review skill.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    handoff

    Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

13 rules. 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 27 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 10

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Done when: every decision, task, and waiting item from the session has a filed home, and a dated entry exists in history.

    line 10
  2. Very specific:

    Company mode: use this when operating-system/ exists with operating-system/GLOBAL_TASKS.md.

    line 16
  3. Very specific:

    Personal mode: use this when root-level TASKS.md and debrief-history.log exist.

    line 17
  4. Distinctive:

    Both detected: ask which mode to use. Write nothing until the user chooses.

    line 18
  5. Distinctive:

    Do not create a structure just to make the skill run.

    line 21
  6. Distinctive:

    Read the source notes fully.

    line 25
  7. Distinctive:

    Do not invent a decision or task.

    line 34
  8. Very specific:

    Add new open tasks to root TASKS.md.

    line 41
  9. Distinctive:

    Update an existing root or area CLAUDE.md only when current state or a durable fact changed.

    line 42
  10. Distinctive:

    Use the top-level operating system, not project folders:

    line 48
  11. Distinctive:

    Do not create another meeting-note file when the supplied source is already a note file.

    line 57
  12. Distinctive:

    every file you plan to touch

    line 63
  13. Distinctive:

    Wait for approval. Write only the approved changes.

    line 68

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 27 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Debrief

Turn rough notes into filed action without losing the story.

Done when: every decision, task, and waiting item from the session has a filed home, and a dated entry exists in history.

Detect the structure first

Inspect the current folder before planning any write.

  1. Company mode: use this when operating-system/ exists with operating-system/GLOBAL_TASKS.md.
  2. Personal mode: use this when root-level TASKS.md and debrief-history.log exist.
  3. Both detected: ask which mode to use. Write nothing until the user chooses.
  4. Neither detected: say that this folder does not contain a recognised personal or company structure. Point the user to START-HERE. Write nothing.

Do not create a structure just to make the skill run.

Extract the signal

Read the source notes fully. Pull out:

  • a two or three line summary
  • decisions and their reasoning
  • the user's open tasks
  • things waiting on other people
  • follow-up drafts
  • durable facts or changed current state

Do not invent a decision or task. If something was discussed but not decided, label it as discussed. Flag legal, financial, HR, and other sensitive material before proposing a write.

Route in personal mode

Personal mode has three homes:

  • Append the dated session narrative, including decisions and reasoning, to debrief-history.log.
  • Add new open tasks to root TASKS.md. Remove or check completed tasks instead of keeping stale open items.
  • Update an existing root or area CLAUDE.md only when current state or a durable fact changed. Replace the relevant current-state lines in place. Never append history there.

History is append-only in debrief-history.log. Check for duplicate tasks before adding one.

Route in company mode

Use the top-level operating system, not project folders:

  • summary and filing record: operating-system/DEBRIEF_LOG.md
  • decisions: operating-system/DECISIONS.md
  • open tasks: operating-system/GLOBAL_TASKS.md
  • waiting on others: operating-system/WAITING_FOR.md

If one of these files is missing and its template exists in operating-system/templates/, include creation from that template in the plan. Never replace an existing file. List durable brain facts as a separate proposed update to the relevant brain/ file and require separate approval before changing it.

Do not create another meeting-note file when the supplied source is already a note file. Draft follow-ups in the response. Never send them.

Approval gate

Before writing, show:

  • every file you plan to touch
  • the exact kind of change for each file
  • any sensitive or uncertain item that needs a decision
  • any follow-up as a clearly labelled draft

Wait for approval. Write only the approved changes. If approval excludes a file or item, do not write it elsewhere. After writing, report what changed and what remains unresolved.

Scaling to per-project folders

Company mode deliberately uses one top-level set of operating-system files. If the system later becomes too busy, you can create project folders with their own DECISIONS.md, WAITING_FOR.md, and meeting files, then change this routing rule. Make that change only after the top-level workflow has proved useful.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.