agentleFS
bks-labbks-lab/open-bridge/skills/briefing/SKILL.md

briefing

Skill13 starsChanged 13 days agoMITView on GitHub

Daily briefing from your own profile (workflow/briefings/<id>.yaml: sections, trackers incl. GitHub/Jira/GitLab/ADO/Linear, inbox rules): inbox first, then steer the day (approve, defer, drop, open agent tabs). /briefing <id> picks a profile. Trigger: "/briefing", "briefing", "good morning", "daily standup", "what needs me", "which briefings do I have".

20 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use handoff and grill-me.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • MicrosoftSkill

    handoff

    Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • GoogleSkill

    grill-me

    A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

The file

Files
SKILL.md

Briefing

Daily and on-demand briefing. Read the referenced file ONLY when triggered.

Arguments

ArgumentEffectDefault
(none)Full briefing of the default profile: Phase 0.5 inbox, the profile's sections, the remaining streams + Phase 2 board.md sync—
<id>Run the profile workflow/briefings/<id>.yaml instead of the defaultdefault profile
--quickFocus box + Stream A only (Phase 0.5 inbox still runs); skips trackers, companion data, channels, Phase 2false
--skip-trackersAll streams except Stream B (offline-friendly); Phase 2 still runsfalse
--commits YYYY-MM-DDDetailed commit analysis for one day (sessions, time est., types) — see references/commit-analysis.md—
--style <s>Show this run as sources, triage, brevity or plan instead of the profile's view.style (briefing.py render --style)profile's view
--htmlAfter terminal output, open the cockpit (/cockpit), the live web page of the Bridgefalse

Mode × Phase matrix

Phasedefault--quick--skip-trackers
Phase 0 (smart detection + day block)✅✅✅
Phase 0.5 (inbox: check + run released)✅✅✅
Stream A (local state)✅✅✅
Stream B (trackers fan-out)✅❌❌
Stream C (companion: calendar, imports)✅❌✅
Stream D (channels)✅❌✅
Phase 2 (board.md sync)✅❌✅
Phase 3 (log entry)✅✅✅
Phase 4 (terminal output)✅✅✅

Prerequisites

  • bridge-config.yaml with work.enabled: true. If not: offer setup.
  • Standing orders are loaded at session start (per AGENTS.md, for every agent). If /briefing is invoked standalone (e.g. via cron or a long-running session), manually load protocols/standing-orders/*.md and protocols/standing-orders/user/*.md before Phase 1 — the applications surface logic in Stream C depends on them, and an applications order is user-tier (a *.md glob alone does not reach user/).

Decision Tree

User wants to...
├── Full daily briefing              → Read references/workflow.md, then
│                                       references/control.md (inbox first,
│                                       one thing first, levers). With a view:
│                                       the render is the shape, not the whole
│                                       run; uncovered streams still run, end
│                                       with the receipt line
├── Quick local-only briefing        → Read references/workflow.md (--quick path)
├── Change how mine LOOKS (triage, brevity, plan, bucket titles,
│   "not this again")                → the profile's `view:` / `mutes:`,
│                                       docs/briefings.md § Views; then
│                                       `briefing.py validate`
├── Which briefings do I have / set one up / change what mine shows
│                                    → `python3 scripts/briefing.py list`;
│                                       new or changed profile: copy
│                                       workflow/briefings/_template.yaml,
│                                       keys in docs/briefings.md, then
│                                       `briefing.py validate`
├── Steer: yes/later/drop, "yes once green", open the day's tabs,
│   status of all tabs, tell a tab   → Read references/control.md
├── Detailed commit analysis         → Read references/commit-analysis.md
├── Are we behind on anything?       → Read references/upstream-summary.md
│                                       (covers BOTH inbound channels: CORE from
│                                       the `role: oss-core` upstream, and every
│                                       subscribed org overlay. Needs an
│                                       `upstreams:` list in bridge-config.yaml;
│                                       a Bridge with none skips)
└── Questions about briefing         → Answer from this file

Sister skills (don't duplicate)

For…Use
Memory drift, doc-link health, branch/config sanity/bridge-status
Live service status of channels/remotes (launchd, processes, ports)/remote
Detailed GitHub/ADO board view (per-project)/dashboard
Live web view of the whole Bridge (work, tabs, machines, tokens)/cockpit (also the target of --html)
Weekly archive/archive

/briefing is a daily rollup. The skills above are deeper dives into a single dimension; cross-link rather than re-implement.

Activity Types (log entries)

These describe what kind of work happened — used as the Type column in work/log.md activity-log tables.

SymbolName
🧪Testing
💻Development
🔬Analysis
📋Planning
📝Documentation
🔧DevOps
📅Meeting
📧Communication
📁Documents
🐛Bug / Incident
🎓Talk / Teaching
🧠Insight / Sequential-thinking

Distinct from the commit-message classification taxonomy in references/commit-analysis.md — that one is for analyzing git history (🐛 Bug Fixing, 🎯 Feature, 🔧 Code Refactoring, …). The taxonomies overlap on a few icons but address different artefacts; don't try to unify them.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.