agentleFS
bestdeejay-designbestdeejay-design/agent-skills/skills/version-bumper/SKILL.md

version-bumper

Skill6 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Suggest the next semantic version and release tag from Conventional Commits in git history. Script bumper.py reads git log subjects (fallback: COMMITS env or --commits FILE for testability), classifies commit types (feat->MINOR, fix/perf/refactor->PATCH, `!` or BREAKING CHANGE->MAJOR) and prints latest_tag, next_version, suggested_tag (e.g. v1.5.0) and counts by type. Pure Python 3 stdlib, offline, deterministic output (-s), read-only (never creates tags). Closes the loop for commit-message-writer and changelog-generator.

3 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Do NOT use when the repository does not follow Conventional Commits — the classification will be mostly other and the suggestion …

    line 112
  2. Distinctive:

    Do NOT use to *create* tags or modify the repository — the tool is read-only by design.

    line 114
  3. Very specific:

    Do NOT use for pre-release/build-metadata schemes (1.2.3-rc.1, 1.2.3+build.5) — the parser accepts only plain X.Y.Z / vX.Y.Z.

    line 116
  4. Distinctive:

    Do NOT use to rewrite history or reorder commits — the tool only reads.

    line 118
  5. Distinctive:

    Do not use to create tags or publish a release.

    line 153

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Version Bumper — semantic version from Conventional Commits

Load this skill when you need to compute the next semantic version and a suggested release tag from the commit history of a git repository that follows Conventional Commits. It is the release-pipeline counterpart of commit-message-writer (writes the commits) and changelog-generator (renders the changelog): this skill decides what version number the changelog and the release tag should carry.

The tool is read-only and offline: it never creates tags, never writes files, and makes no network calls. It reads git log subjects, classifies each commit by type, and prints the current version, the next version and a suggested tag. For testability the commit list can be fed from the COMMITS environment variable or a file (--commits FILE, one subject per line) — no git repository required.


The bumper script

scripts/bumper.py — pure Python 3 stdlib (no dependencies).

Source of commitsCommand
Git repository (default)python3 bumper.py --path /path/to/repo
Explicit current versionpython3 bumper.py --path . --current 1.2.3
Latest semver tagpython3 bumper.py --path . --from-tags
File (no git needed)python3 bumper.py --commits commits.txt --current 1.2.3
Environment (no git needed)COMMITS='feat: a\nfix: b' python3 bumper.py --current 1.2.3

Bump rules (Conventional Commits v1.0.0)

SignalBumpExample
Breaking (! or BREAKING CHANGE: footer)MAJORfeat!: drop python 3.7
featMINORfeat: add widget
fix, perf, refactorPATCHfix: repair crash
docs, style, test, chore, build, ci, revert, unknownno bumpdocs: readme

Type matching is case-insensitive (Feat: counts as feat). Unknown types are counted as other and never trigger a bump.

Output

latest_tag: v1.0.0
current_version: 1.0.0
next_version: 1.5.0
suggested_tag: v1.5.0
bump: minor
commits_analyzed: 14
counts: feat=1, fix=8, perf=2, refactor=1, docs=1, style=1, test=2, chore=1, build=0, ci=0, revert=0, breaking=1, other=0

Flags

  • --current X.Y.Z — baseline version; skips tag lookup
  • --from-tags — take the baseline from the highest semver tag (v1.2.3, 1.2.3); falls back to 0.0.0 with a warning when no tags exist
  • --commits FILE — read commit subjects from a file (one per line) instead of git log; useful for tests and for repos without git
  • --dry-run — accepted for pipeline compatibility; the tool is read-only, so this is the default behavior
  • -s / --stable — deterministic output: sorts the analyzed commits and guarantees the same next_version for the same input

Usage example (typical)

# Before a release: what version should the next tag carry?
python3 skills/version-bumper/scripts/bumper.py --path . --from-tags

# Pin the baseline explicitly (no tag lookup)
python3 skills/version-bumper/scripts/bumper.py --path . --current 1.2.3

# Deterministic output for CI / release pipeline
python3 skills/version-bumper/scripts/bumper.py --path . --from-tags -s

# Test the classifier without a git repo
python3 skills/version-bumper/scripts/bumper.py --commits commits.txt --current 1.2.3

Interpretation guidance

  • bump: major — at least one breaking commit (! or BREAKING CHANGE: footer). Review the breaking changes before tagging; MAJOR signals a compatibility break to consumers.
  • bump: minor — new features present, no breaking changes.
  • bump: patch — only fixes/refactors/perf; no features.
  • bump: none — only docs/chore/style/test/build/ci/revert commits. Do not create a release tag; the version stays unchanged.
  • latest_tag: none — no semver tags found; the tool started from 0.0.0. For a first release, decide whether v0.1.0 (first feature) or v1.0.0 (first stable API) is appropriate.
  • The tool only suggests a tag. Creating the tag, updating the changelog and pushing are separate steps — run changelog-generator with the suggested version, then tag manually.

Do NOT use

  • Do NOT use when the repository does not follow Conventional Commits — the classification will be mostly other and the suggestion meaningless.
  • Do NOT use to create tags or modify the repository — the tool is read-only by design.
  • Do NOT use for pre-release/build-metadata schemes (1.2.3-rc.1, 1.2.3+build.5) — the parser accepts only plain X.Y.Z / vX.Y.Z.
  • Do NOT use to rewrite history or reorder commits — the tool only reads.

Canonical analogues

Full source depth — in references/canonical-patterns.md. Backbone:

<table> <tr><th>Analog</th><th>What we borrow</th></tr> <tr><td>Conventional Commits spec</td><td>Type taxonomy, `!` marker, `BREAKING CHANGE:` footer, bump semantics</td></tr> <tr><td>python-semantic-release</td><td>Version-from-tags, bump-level resolution, deterministic output</td></tr> <tr><td>semantic-release</td><td>Commit-driven release decision, no-release-when-no-release-commits</td></tr> <tr><td>bump-my-version</td><td>Strict semver parsing, tag prefix handling</td></tr> <tr><td>commitizen</td><td>Commit classification, changelog+version coupling</td></tr> <tr><td>git-cliff</td><td>Conventional-Commits parsing, tag-range analysis</td></tr> </table>

Installation

# For opencode
cp -r skills/version-bumper ~/.config/opencode/skills/

# For other agents
# Copy the skill folder to your skills directory; requires Python 3.
# git is optional — --commits FILE mode works without it.

Note: the tool suggests a version; it never tags, never commits and never pushes. Wire it into the release pipeline as the version source for changelog-generator, then create the tag yourself.

Boundaries

  • Do not use to create tags or publish a release; it only recommends a version.

Evidence and completion gate

Run the documented command against the user’s actual input. Report the command, exit status, files changed or produced, and relevant stdout/stderr. Separate blocked or pre-existing failures from failures introduced by the current work. Do not call the result complete when the script was only described or when an artifact was not reopened and checked.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.