docs-project
Skill6 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Project (engineering) documentation branch — the 'how': README, ENTRY, AGENT/DELIVERY runbooks, and docs/ (REFERENCE map, ARCHITECTURE, ADR, SAGA, TEST_CASES, DEV_GUIDE, IMPROVEMENTS, TROUBLESHOOTING, BACKLOG, REVIEW, STATUS) plus contracts/ (OpenAPI/AsyncAPI — machine truth written BEFORE code). The map rule: every doc gets a card in REFERENCE.md. Full catalog + checklist in references/project-docs.md. Triggers: 'проектная документация', 'архитектура документация', 'adr', 'engineering docs', 'документация разработчика', 'контракты openapi', 'project docs', 'инженерная документация'.
In this repository59 other files it gives its agents.
- skills/chronos/references/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- api-contract-testingSkill
- api-doc-generatorSkill
- canonSkill
- censorSkill
- changelog-generatorSkill
- chronosSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- commit-lintSkill
- commit-message-writerSkill
- coverage-analyzerSkill
- csv-proSkill
- data-analysisSkill
- deweySkill
- diagram-makerSkill
- doc-compareSkill
- docs-productSkill
- docs-systemSkill
- dsh-runnerSkill
- frontend-a11ySkill
- frontend-design-tasteSkill
- frontend-perfectionSkill
- frontend-performanceSkill
- frontend-testingSkill
- github-repo-hygieneSkill
- long-running-agent-workflowSkill
- mermaid-to-imageSkill
- mobile-frontendSkill
- pdf-report-builderSkill
- plan-skillSkill
- prd-to-appSkill
- presentation-craftSkill
- presentation-engineeringSkill
- presentation-makerSkill
- raster-to-svgSkill
- reddit-karmaSkill
- repo-community-filesSkill
- repo-metadata-healthSkill
- repo-readme-assetsSkill
- repo-social-previewSkill
- secret-scannerSkill
- security-reviewSkill
- seo-auditSkill
- seo-contentSkill
- seo-crawlSkill
- seo-schemaSkill
- seo-toolkitSkill
- skill-feedbackSkill
- skill-forgeSkill
- skill-suggesterSkill
- sql-helperSkill
- systematic-debuggerSkill
- test-generatorSkill
- test-graphicsSkill
- velesSkill
- version-bumperSkill
- video-script-writerSkill
- web-replicationSkill
- web-scraperSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 14
Use this skill to write the engineering documents: architecture, decisions (ADR), contracts, dev guides, tests, and the documentation map.
- Very specific: line 69
Every document that exists gets a card in docs/REFERENCE.md (purpose → structure → key facts → links).
- Very specific: line 87
Do not use for product vision, PRDs, or roadmap decisions.
- Distinctive: line 92
Write contracts before implementation docs when the project exposes APIs or events.
- Distinctive: line 94
Add runbooks and test cases with copy-pasteable commands and expected results.
- Very specific: line 95
Write REFERENCE.md last and add a card for every document.
- Distinctive: line 99
Every generated document names its source of truth, owner or update trigger, prerequisites, commands, and failure path.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Docs Project — engineering documentation («how»)
Use this skill to write the engineering documents: architecture, decisions
(ADR), contracts, dev guides, tests, and the documentation map. Assumes the
product docs exist (docs-product: VISION/PRD/ROADMAP/FEATURES).
When to use
- A project needs its engineering docs: README, ENTRY, ARCHITECTURE, ADR, tests.
- User asks for "проектная документация", "архитектура документация", "adr", "инженерная документация", "контракты openapi", "engineering docs".
- Contracts (OpenAPI/AsyncAPI) must be written before code.
Do NOT use
- For product docs (VISION/PRD/ROADMAP/FEATURES) — that is
docs-product. - For the meta-guide (phases, levels L1/L2/L3, completeness checklist) —
docs-system.
Root documents
| File | Purpose | Phase | Template |
README.md | Overview: what it is, stack, status, quick start, structure | 1 → 10 | templates/project/README.tmpl |
ENTRY.md | Entry point: "start here", navigation "topic → file", onboarding checklist | 9 | templates/project/ENTRY.tmpl |
AGENT.md | Runbook for the autonomous build agent: phases, rules, DoD, commit gate | 8 | — |
DELIVERY.md | Delivery gate: build/run/verify, what's in, what's NOT | 8 | — |
| Legal/community | LICENSE, CONTRIBUTING, CODE_OF_CONDUCT, SECURITY | 1/9 | — |
docs/ — engineering documents
| File | Purpose | Phase | Template |
docs/REFERENCE.md | The map. Card for EVERY doc: purpose/structure/facts/links, hierarchy of truth, drift table. Written last. | 10 | templates/project/REFERENCE.tmpl |
docs/ARCHITECTURE.md | Components, communication, data flows, tech stack | 2 → 6 | templates/project/ARCHITECTURE.tmpl |
docs/ADR/ADR-000.md | Architecture Decision Records — one per significant decision | 2 (ongoing) | templates/project/ADR-000.tmpl |
docs/SAGA.md | Cross-module scenarios (choreography, events, compensation, idempotency) | 5 | templates/project/SAGA.tmpl |
docs/TEST_CASES.md | Test cases (Gherkin-style) + coverage matrix | 6 | templates/project/TEST_CASES.tmpl |
docs/DEV_GUIDE.md | Local dev: prerequisites, run, env, migrations, debugging | 7 | templates/project/DEV_GUIDE.tmpl |
docs/IMPROVEMENTS.md | Known issues / doc-vs-fact drift + prioritized fix plan | 8 | templates/project/IMPROVEMENTS.tmpl |
docs/TROUBLESHOOTING.md | Runtime error diagnostics (E1…En) + startup checklist | 8 | templates/project/TROUBLESHOOTING.tmpl |
docs/BACKLOG.md | Ideas, deferred features, priorities | 1 | templates/project/BACKLOG.tmpl |
docs/REVIEW.md | Doc audit: problems, resolutions, per-service status | 10 | templates/project/REVIEW.tmpl |
docs/STATUS.md | L1 alternative to REVIEW: done / in progress / limitations | 10 | templates/project/STATUS.tmpl |
contracts/ — machine truth (API-first / microservices)
| Path | Purpose | When |
contracts/openapi/*.yaml | Per-service OpenAPI specs — the HTTP truth | before code |
contracts/asyncapi/events.yaml | Event catalog — the event truth | before code |
contracts/test/ | Contract-conformance test fixtures | with tests |
Contracts are written BEFORE code. The code implements the contract, not the other way around — «machine truth before code».
The map rule
Every document that exists gets a card in docs/REFERENCE.md
(purpose → structure → key facts → links). Written last, maintained on every
change: touch a doc → update its card.
Checklist (project side)
- One entry point exists (
ENTRY.md) and routes "topic → file". - Every doc has a card in
REFERENCE.md(including REFERENCE itself). - Hierarchy of truth declared (which doc wins on conflict).
- Drift table (doc-vs-fact) populated — no silent inconsistencies.
- Contracts exist before code for every API/event (API-first projects).
DELIVERY.mdstates how to build/verify/what's in/what's NOT.
Rule: engineering docs answer «how»; the map (
REFERENCE.md) is written last because it describes everything above it.
Boundaries
- Do not use for product vision, PRDs, or roadmap decisions; use
docs-product.
Authoring procedure
- Inventory the repository and establish the hierarchy of truth.
- Write contracts before implementation docs when the project exposes APIs or events.
- Draft architecture and ADRs from observed code and explicit decisions; label assumptions.
- Add runbooks and test cases with copy-pasteable commands and expected results.
- Write
REFERENCE.mdlast and add a card for every document.
Definition of done
Every generated document names its source of truth, owner or update trigger, prerequisites, commands, and failure path. Verify links, commands, and contract examples against the repository; do not mark a document complete merely because the template is filled.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

