agentleFS
bestdeejay-designbestdeejay-design/agent-skills/skills/api-contract-testing/SKILL.md

api-contract-testing

Skill6 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Validate an API contract against an OpenAPI 3.x specification (JSON or YAML) and an optional manifest of expected endpoints. Script api_contract.py enumerates operations (paths + webhooks), checks spec internal consistency (unresolved $refs, duplicates, missing responses), compares the manifest against the spec offline, and in live mode probes each manifest endpoint over HTTP and compares the actual status with the expected one. Pure Python 3 stdlib (argparse, json, pathlib, sys, urllib.request) with a built-in minimal YAML subset parser — no PyYAML, no requests. Emits a machine-readable JSON report (endpoints_count, missing_from_spec, contract_violations, conformant, errors) and uses exit codes 0/1/2. Closes the loop for api-doc-generator and test-generator.

  • Installs packages

6 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    CI gate: use --json and pipe through a JSON check, or rely on the exit code directly (0/1/2).

    line 156
  2. Very specific:

    Base URL: prefer servers[0].url in the spec.

    line 158
  3. Very specific:

    Live mode is manifest-driven: only endpoints listed in the manifest are probed.

    line 160

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

API Contract Testing — validate an OpenAPI spec against expected endpoints

Load this skill when you need to check that a running API (or a spec on disk) actually matches the contract it promises. It is the verification counterpart of api-doc-generator (which writes the spec) and test-generator (which writes the tests): this skill checks the spec against a manifest of expected endpoints and, optionally, against the live API.

The tool is pure Python 3 stdlib — no PyYAML, no requests, no pip install. It reads an OpenAPI 3.x document from a file (.json or .yaml) or a URL, enumerates every declared operation (under paths and webhooks), checks the spec's internal consistency, and compares it against an optional manifest file. In --offline mode it never touches the network; in live mode it probes each manifest endpoint over HTTP and compares the actual status code with the expected one.

Triggers

Load this skill when the request matches any of these (EN / RU):

  • "api contract testing", "contract test", "check the API against the spec"
  • "validate openapi spec", "spec vs manifest", "endpoint coverage"
  • "проверь контракт API", "тест контракта", "сверь спецификацию с API"
  • "валидация openapi", "проверка эндпоинтов", "контрактное тестирование"
  • "does the API match the spec", "missing endpoints", "expected status codes"

DO NOT USE FOR: generating the OpenAPI spec (use api-doc-generator); writing the tests (use test-generator). This skill only checks contracts, it does not author them.


The api_contract.py script

scripts/api_contract.py — pure Python 3 stdlib (no dependencies).

ModeCommand
Offline, JSON reportpython3 api_contract.py --spec openapi.json --offline --json
Offline + manifestpython3 api_contract.py --spec openapi.yaml --manifest endpoints.txt --offline
Live checkspython3 api_contract.py --spec openapi.json --manifest endpoints.txt --base-url https://api.example.com
Spec from URLpython3 api_contract.py --spec-url https://example.com/openapi.json --manifest endpoints.txt

Flags

  • --spec <path> — OpenAPI spec file (.json, .yaml, .yml). YAML is parsed by a built-in subset parser (see Limitations).
  • --spec-url <URL> — fetch the spec over HTTP(S) with urllib.request. The format is detected by the URL extension, then by trying JSON first and falling back to the YAML parser.
  • --base-url <URL> — base URL for live checks. Resolution order: --base-url → spec servers[0].url → env APITEST_BASE_URL.
  • --manifest <file> — expected contract, one METHOD path [expected_status] per line (blank lines and # comments ignored). expected_status may be an exact code (200), a class wildcard (2xx), or default.
  • --json — emit the report as a JSON object on stdout (machine-readable).
  • --offline — no network at all: validate spec internal consistency and compare the manifest against the spec only.

Exit codes

CodeMeaning
0conformant (or offline-ok)
1contract violations detected (missing endpoints, mismatched statuses)
2spec/parse/run error (unreadable file, invalid JSON/YAML, bad manifest, live-check network failure)

Report structure

The report is always the same JSON structure; --json prints it verbatim, without --json it is rendered as text.

{
  "endpoints_count": 2,
  "missing_from_spec": [{"method": "DELETE", "path": "/pets", "expected": "204"}],
  "contract_violations": [{"method": "GET", "path": "/pets", "expected": "200", "actual": "404", "severity": "error"}],
  "conformant": false,
  "errors": []
}
  • endpoints_count — number of operations declared in the spec (paths + webhooks).
  • missing_from_spec — manifest entries that do not exist in the spec.
  • contract_violations — severity: "error" breaks the contract (missing expected status, unresolved $ref); severity: "warning" is informational (duplicate operation, operation without responses, empty spec).
  • conformant — true iff no errors, no missing endpoints and no error-severity violations.
  • errors — fatal problems (parse failures, live-check network errors).

Usage example (typical)

# 1. Offline sanity check of a spec: is it internally consistent?
python3 skills/api-contract-testing/scripts/api_contract.py \
  --spec openapi.yaml --offline --json

# 2. Does the spec cover everything the product promised?
python3 skills/api-contract-testing/scripts/api_contract.py \
  --spec openapi.json --manifest endpoints.txt --offline --json

# 3. Live: does the running API actually return the promised statuses?
python3 skills/api-contract-testing/scripts/api_contract.py \
  --spec openapi.json --manifest endpoints.txt --base-url https://api.example.com

# 4. Machine-readable gate for CI (exit code drives the pipeline)
python3 skills/api-contract-testing/scripts/api_contract.py \
  --spec openapi.yaml --manifest endpoints.txt --offline --json \
  | python3 -c 'import json,sys; sys.exit(0 if json.load(sys.stdin)["conformant"] else 1)'

Manifest format

# expected API contract
GET    /pets        200
POST   /pets        201
DELETE /pets/{id}   204
GET    /health      2xx

expected_status is optional — a line without it only asserts that the endpoint exists in the spec. Wildcards (2xx, 4xx) match any code in that class; default matches the spec's default response key.

Interpretation guidance

  • conformant: true — the spec is internally consistent and every manifest endpoint exists with the expected status (offline), or the live API returned the expected statuses (live mode).
  • missing_from_spec non-empty — the product promised endpoints the spec does not declare. Either the spec is stale (regenerate with api-doc-generator) or the manifest is wrong.
  • contract_violations with severity: "error" — a promised status is not declared in the spec (offline) or the live API returned a different status (live). This is the signal that breaks the contract.
  • severity: "warning" — spec hygiene issues (duplicate operations, operations without responses, unresolved $ref). They do not fail the run but should be fixed.
  • errors non-empty — the tool could not do its job (file not found, invalid JSON/YAML, bad manifest line, network failure). Exit code 2.

Integration notes

  • CI gate: use --json and pipe through a JSON check, or rely on the exit code directly (0/1/2).
  • Base URL: prefer servers[0].url in the spec; override with --base-url or APITEST_BASE_URL for per-environment runs.
  • Live mode is manifest-driven: only endpoints listed in the manifest are probed; the spec itself is never called. Use --offline in CI when the API is not deployed yet.
  • Companion skills: api-doc-generator produces the spec, test-generator produces the tests — this skill verifies the contract between them.

Limitations

  • YAML support is a subset, not a full YAML parser. The built-in parser handles block mappings/sequences, flow collections ({...}, [...]), quoted scalars, comments and block scalars (|, >). It does not support anchors/aliases (&a, *a), tags (!!str), multi-document streams (--- separators), or exotic scalar quoting. If your spec uses those, convert it to JSON (python3 -c 'import yaml,json,sys; print(json.dumps(yaml.safe_load(sys.stdin)))' with PyYAML available) and pass the .json file.
  • No schema validation — the tool checks structure and consistency, not whether every field conforms to the OpenAPI meta-schema.
  • Live checks are status-code only — request/response bodies are not validated against the spec's schemas.
  • Path matching is exact — /pets and /pets/ are treated as different paths; template parameters (/pets/{id}) must match literally.

Canonical analogues

Full source depth — in references/canonical-patterns.md. Backbone:

<table> <tr><th>Analog</th><th>What we borrow</th></tr> <tr><td>Schemathesis</td><td>Spec-driven contract checking, property-based probing of declared responses</td></tr> <tr><td>Dredd</td><td>Manifest/transaction-driven verification of endpoints against a live API</td></tr> <tr><td>oasdiff</td><td>Spec internal-consistency and compatibility analysis</td></tr> <tr><td>Spectral</td><td>Lint-style rules for spec hygiene (warnings vs. errors)</td></tr> <tr><td>openapi-generator</td><td>Endpoint enumeration from paths + operations as the source of truth</td></tr> </table>

Installation

# For opencode
cp -r skills/api-contract-testing ~/.config/opencode/skills/

# For other agents
# Copy the skill folder to your skills directory; requires Python 3 only.

Note: the tool is read-only — it never modifies the spec, the manifest or the API. It reports; you decide what to fix.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.