test-strategy
Skill112 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Coverage-design method for qa-engineer — pyramid ratios per archetype, equivalence/boundary/property case selection, mutation score as the real coverage signal, and a flake-quarantine policy. Turns "coverage is 90%" (a number with no method) into a defensible test plan. Emits TEST-STRATEGY-{slug}.md, which the QA gate checks exists.
39 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- frnkgns/Overgeared-Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- reddygopalkrishna/developer-agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- l-gevity/l-gevity-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- hatemecha/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- lelborn/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- MarieLynneBlock/arcanum-artifextheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use database-testing, data-pipelines and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
petrkindlmannSkilldatabase-testing
Validate database integrity, test migrations forward and backward, verify schema constraints, manage seed data, detect migration drift, and identify query performance issues. Covers PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB with Prisma, TypeORM, Drizzle, and SQLAlchemy, plus Testcontainers test databases. Use when: "database test," "migration test," "migration rollback," "rollback test," "data integrity," "SQL test," "schema validation," "seed data," "query performance," "Testcontainers." Not for: synthetic data generation/masking at scale — use test-data-management; Docker/IaC test-environment provisioning — use test-environments; SQL injection — use security-testing. Related: test-data-management, test-environments, security-testing, ci-cd-integration.
Also in 3 projects that use this
YepAPISkilldata-pipelines
ETL patterns, cron scheduling, queue-based processing, and batch jobs with Inngest/BullMQ.
Also in 3 projects that use this
testified-ossSkillexploratory-testing
Guide exploratory testing sessions including charter creation, session-based testing, heuristics application, and finding documentation. Use when planning exploratory testing, conducting test sessions, or documenting discoveries.
Also in 3 projects that use this
ffsshhttiikkSkillunit-testing
Unit testing best practices and patterns
Also in 4 projects that use this
AnthropicSkillincident-response
Run an incident response workflow — triage, communicate, and write postmortem. Trigger with "we have an incident", "production is down", an alert that needs severity assessment, a status update mid-incident, or when writing a blameless postmortem after resolution.
Also in 7 projects that use this
OpenAISkillobservability
Vercel Observability expert guidance — Drains (logs, traces, speed insights, web analytics), Web Analytics, Speed Insights, runtime logs, custom events, OpenTelemetry integration, and monitoring dashboards. Use when instrumenting, debugging, or optimizing application performance and user experience on Vercel.
Also in 6 projects that use this
Other versions39 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 39
- nurettincoban/ai-prd-workflow★ 300same name
- petrkindlmann/qa-skills★ 209same name
- kid-sid/claude-spellbook★ 190same name
- l-gevity/l-gevity-skills★ 80same name
- fishzjp/qa-skills★ 62same name
- nahid-sparktales/agent-dispatcher★ 59same name
- nimadorostkar/Claude-Skills-collection★ 33same name
- caiaffa/claude-code-ultimate-engineering-system★ 17same name
- jpantsjoha/ai-native-developer-experience★ 13same name
- Mozurok/fhorja.dev★ 10same name
29 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository35 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- aesthetic-instrumentSkill
- anti-patternsSkill
- anydesignSkill
- archetype-review-baseSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- build-speedSkill
- codex-hostSkill
- committed-aestheticSkill
- cost-modelSkill
- crystallizeSkill
- decision-evalSkill
- deploy-landedSkill
- discoverySkill
- done-blockedSkill
- great_ctoSkill
- lifecycle-messagingSkill
- migration-ready-schemaSkill
- observability-baselineSkill
- opportunity-solution-treeSkill
- outcome-roadmapSkill
- pm-planningSkill
- pre-mortemSkill
- product-economicsSkill
- prose-styleSkill
- quant-validationSkill
- secrets-rotationSkill
- signing-preflightSkill
- skeptical-triageSkill
- stack-baselineSkill
- ui-ux-pro-maxSkill
- vertical-onboardingSkill
- verticalsSkill
- well-architectedSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 34 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 43
Don't enumerate inputs; partition them.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 34 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
test-strategy
Coverage % is a number with no method. This skill makes the QA plan defensible: what to test, why that set, and a real signal that the tests bite.
qa-engineer emits docs/qa-reports/TEST-STRATEGY-{slug}.md capturing the four
decisions below; the QA gate checks the file exists for medium/large features.
1. Pyramid ratio — pick by archetype (not by reflex)
The right unit:integration:e2e mix depends on where the risk lives.
| Archetype | unit | integration | e2e | why |
| library / devtools / cli | 80% | 15% | 5% | logic-dense, few I/O seams |
| web-app / saas | 60% | 30% | 10% | request→db→render seams dominate |
| commerce / fintech / marketplace | 50% | 35% | 15% | money paths need cross-component proof |
| data-platform / streaming | 45% | 45% | 10% | correctness lives in pipelines, not units |
| ai-system / agent-product | 50% | 20% | 10% + evals 20% | behaviour is the contract → eval set (see [[decision-eval]]) |
State the chosen ratio in TEST-STRATEGY and justify any deviation.
2. Case selection — equivalence / boundary / property
Don't enumerate inputs; partition them.
- Equivalence classes — one representative per class of behaviour (valid, invalid, empty, max). Testing 5 valid ids ≠ testing 5 classes.
- Boundaries — the bug lives at the edge: 0, 1, n-1, n, n+1, off-by-one, empty, overflow, the threshold itself.
- Property-based — for pure/transform logic, assert invariants over generated input (round-trip
decode(encode(x))===x, idempotency, ordering) instead of hand-picked cases. Use fast-check / Hypothesis where the logic warrants it.
3. Mutation score — the only coverage that proves the tests bite
Line/branch coverage proves code ran, not that a test would fail if it broke. Mutation testing (Stryker / mutmut / cargo-mutants) flips operators/conditions and checks a test catches it. A "90% covered" module with 30% mutation score has assertion-free tests. Target: mutation score ≥ 60% on changed logic-dense files; report it in TEST-STRATEGY when the change is logic-heavy. Coverage % is the cheap proxy; mutation score is the truth.
4. Flake quarantine — a flaky test is worse than no test
A test that fails ~randomly trains the team to ignore red. Policy:
- A test that fails non-deterministically is quarantined (skipped + tracked in a Beads bug), not left to rot the signal.
- Quarantine is time-boxed: a bug with an owner and a deadline, not
it.skipforever. - Root-cause before re-enabling (shared state, timing, real network, ordering).
- This is the same discipline the eval runner needs (see the eval
flakyflag intests/eval/runner.mjs— stddev > 0.1 is a flake signal).
Output: TEST-STRATEGY-{slug}.md
# TEST-STRATEGY-{slug}
- Archetype + chosen pyramid ratio (+ justification for any deviation)
- Equivalence classes & boundaries enumerated per changed unit
- Property-based candidates (which logic, which invariants)
- Mutation-score target + result (for logic-dense changes)
- Quarantine list (flaky tests + their tracking bug)Done = the plan answers "why THIS set of tests", not just "how much is covered".
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

