agentleFS
avelikiyavelikiy/great_cto/skills/build-speed/SKILL.md

build-speed

Skill112 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Make a slow CI pipeline or build faster by measuring it first — per-step durations, the slowest step, a target — then one change at a time, re-measured the same way. Speed never comes from removing, skipping or weakening a check. Use when a build or CI is slow ("CI долго", "ускорь сборку", "гейт идёт 40 минут", "build takes forever"). Loaded by devops, ci-resolver.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    run fewer tests "because they never fail".

    line 69

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

build-speed — measure, then change one thing, then measure the same way

A build is made faster by finding where the minutes go. Guessing goes to the step that looks heavy; measuring goes to the step that is. On this repository's own gate one step, lib tests run in a single worker, was 21–30 of 28–38 measured minutes: 75–80% of the gate. Eight workers took that step to 5 minutes; no cache would have.

1. Measure before anything changes

  • Per step, not in total. The duration of each step from the CI log or the runner's API (gh run view --json jobs, the TAP duration_ms, timestamps around each step). A total says the build is slow; steps say where.
  • At least three runs of unchanged code. Write down the range, not one number: a shared runner and a busy laptop both vary by a third.
  • Note the conditions. Runner type, cores, cache state (cold or warm), concurrency flags. A measurement without its conditions cannot be repeated.

2. Pick one step and a target

The slowest step, unless a faster one runs on every commit and the slow one does not. Write the target before the change: "lib tests from 21–30 min to under 10 min, same tests, same pass count". No target, no way to say the change worked.

3. Change one thing

Usual levers, in the order they usually pay:

LeverWhen it pays
Parallel workerstests are independent and the machine has idle cores
Run only what changed (affected targets)a monorepo, and the full set still runs before merge
Dependency and layer cachesinstall or image build is a large share of a step
Split a long job across runnersone job dominates and runners are cheap
Fix the slowest tests themselvesa few tests are most of the time (sort by duration)

Parallel workers expose tests that share state: a database, a port, a temp path, a global config. A test that fails only in parallel is a real finding: give each worker its own resource. Never answer it by going back to one worker silently.

4. Re-measure the same way

Same method, same conditions, same number of runs. Report before, after, and the pass count of both. If the pass count differs, the change is not a speed-up: it dropped or broke tests.

Forbidden

Speed bought by checking less is not speed. Never:

  • skip, delete, .only or mark as allow-failure a test or a step;
  • lower a threshold, a coverage floor or a timeout so a check passes sooner;
  • move a check out of the path to merge or deploy ("run e2e nightly instead") without the operator's decision, written down with its risk;
  • run fewer tests "because they never fail".

Report

BUILD-SPEED <pipeline> @ <commit>
  step     : lib tests
  before   : 22–29 min (2 runs, 1 worker, 10-core host, CPU 80% idle)
  after    : 4.5–5.3 min (3 runs, 8 workers, same host)
  tests    : 4034 before, 4034 after, same pass count
  change   : ci-local.sh --jobs=8, lib tests only; root and board fixtures keep 2

A line you could not measure is NOT MEASURED with the reason.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.