done-blocked
Skill112 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Reusable reporting contract for any agent that hands work back to the pipeline. Forces ONE of two terminal statuses (DONE or BLOCKED) with a specific evidence shape. Stops vague "probably finished" and "kind of stuck" verdicts.
In this repository35 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- aesthetic-instrumentSkill
- anti-patternsSkill
- anydesignSkill
- archetype-review-baseSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- build-speedSkill
- codex-hostSkill
- committed-aestheticSkill
- cost-modelSkill
- crystallizeSkill
- decision-evalSkill
- deploy-landedSkill
- discoverySkill
- great_ctoSkill
- lifecycle-messagingSkill
- migration-ready-schemaSkill
- observability-baselineSkill
- opportunity-solution-treeSkill
- outcome-roadmapSkill
- pm-planningSkill
- pre-mortemSkill
- product-economicsSkill
- prose-styleSkill
- quant-validationSkill
- secrets-rotationSkill
- signing-preflightSkill
- skeptical-triageSkill
- stack-baselineSkill
- test-strategySkill
- ui-ux-pro-maxSkill
- vertical-onboardingSkill
- verticalsSkill
- well-architectedSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 27
Every agent's final handoff line is one of:
- Very specific: line 50
Silence is not DONE: If the agent stops producing output without a terminal line, the parent / next stage treats it as BLOCKED with …
- Distinctive: line 65
Every agent writes the verdict to two places:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
DONE / BLOCKED Reporting Contract
Terminal status is exactly two states, and BLOCKED requires specific evidence — not vague obstruction reports.
The contract
Every agent's final handoff line is one of:
DONE: <one-sentence summary of what shipped>
artifact: <path to report/PR/commit>
next: <who picks this up — pipeline stage, gate, or "pipeline continues">BLOCKED: <one-sentence summary of the obstacle>
tried: <what was attempted — file paths, commands, error signatures>
failed_because: <concrete reason — not "unclear", not "complex">
need: <specific unblock — file access, missing config, CTO decision, another agent>Hard rules
- No third state. "Mostly done", "done with caveats", "almost there" → choose. If caveats exist, the caveat itself decides:
- Caveat is cosmetic / P2+ → DONE (file a Beads bug, move on)
- Caveat blocks the next pipeline stage → BLOCKED (do not pretend)
- BLOCKED requires three fields.
tried+failed_because+need. Missing any field → the verdict is rejected and the agent must re-report. No exceptions for "obvious" cases. - Silence is not DONE. If the agent stops producing output without a terminal line, the parent / next stage treats it as BLOCKED with
failed_because: silent — no terminal verdict written. failed_becausemust be concrete. These are rejected:- "environment issue" → say which command failed with what error
- "tests failing" → say which tests and the actual assertion message
- "unclear requirements" → say which decision is needed and the two options
- "not enough context" → say which file / doc / config you tried to read
neednames a specific unblock. These are rejected:- "more information" → ask one specific question
- "help from another agent" → name the agent (architect / security-officer / …)
- "CTO approval" → state the exact choice (approve gate X, pick option A vs B, waive check)
Where the verdict goes
Every agent writes the verdict to two places:
- Last line of agent output (visible to the orchestrator that spawned it).
.great_cto/verdicts/<agent>-<YYYY-MM-DD-HHMMSS>.log— append-only audit trail.
mkdir -p .great_cto/verdicts
VERDICT_FILE=".great_cto/verdicts/<agent>-$(date -u +%Y-%m-%d-%H%M%S).log"
printf '%s\n' "$VERDICT_LINE" > "$VERDICT_FILE"Examples
Good — DONE:
DONE: CSO audit passed — 0 P0, 2 P1 findings filed as Beads tasks.
artifact: docs/security/CSO-2026-04-19.md
next: gate:ship ready for CTO approvalGood — BLOCKED:
BLOCKED: senior-dev cannot claim task BD-42 — circular dependency with BD-38.
tried: bd ready → BD-42 did not appear; bd dep tree BD-42 → shows BD-38 blocks BD-42, BD-42 blocks BD-38
failed_because: both tasks depend on each other transitively (BD-42 → BD-38 → BD-39 → BD-42)
need: architect to split BD-39 into two tasks so the cycle breaksRejected — vague BLOCKED:
BLOCKED: couldn't finish QA — environment problems.
tried: ran tests
failed_because: stuff broken
need: helpWhy rejected: tried lacks command/path; failed_because is tautological; need is not actionable.
Measuring the contract
.great_cto/verdicts/*.log is machine-readable. Weekly digest can compute:
DONE:BLOCKEDratio per agent — too many BLOCKED from one agent = that role is under-resourced or prompt is unclearfailed_becauseclustering — if the same reason appears 3+ times, that's a recurring obstruction worth a meta-fix (tooling, doc, skill)- Silence rate (agents with no terminal verdict written) — should trend to zero
Anti-patterns
- Writing both DONE and BLOCKED in the same report ("DONE but blocked on X"). Pick one. If you're blocked, the work isn't done.
- Using DONE as a politeness signal when the gate still fails. The verdict is for the machine, not the CTO's feelings.
- Writing the verdict only to stdout without persisting to
.great_cto/verdicts/. The audit trail is what makes the contract measurable.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

