scout
Skill3 starsChanged 34 days agoMITView on GitHub
Find new roles that fit the user's profile and add them to the pipeline inbox. Scans every watchlist company's ATS board (`scout.watchlist_scan`, a capped share of the run), always runs the scout plan's open-market web queries (plan.md) until the run reaches its target, and hands candidates to the `roles.add` op, which dedupes, skips dead postings, swaps aggregator links for the company's own posting, enforces the watchlist share and writes the run log. Never scores, never moves roles.
47 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- venhdev/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- dfirmin/compasstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- apattichis/agentic-research-toolkittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- eggs-gd/career-spacetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- dirien/yet-another-agent-harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- oscout/scouttheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use expand, explain and 8 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
andrewclark88Skillexpand
Expand a project's scope by updating its foundation documents. Reads existing north-star.md (or north-star-<project>.md), architecture.md, and roadmap.md, understands the codebase state, then interviews the user about the expansion. Updates foundation docs and roadmap so design can consume them in the next phase. Use when adding a major capability, new subsystem, or architectural shift — not for small one-offs (use feature for those).
Also in 3 projects that use this
sunnyclinches44Skillexplain
Explains code using real-world analogies and ASCII diagrams
Also in 5 projects that use this
WordPressSkillblueprint
Use when the deliverable is WordPress Playground Blueprint JSON or a Blueprint bundle, including creating, editing, reviewing, validating schema keys, choosing steps/resources, and debugging Blueprint files. For only running or sharing a Playground environment, use wp-playground.
Also in 3 projects that use this
AWSSkillissue
Implement a GitHub issue end-to-end — branch, code, test, docs, and commit.
Also in 3 projects that use this
bradtraversySkillfeature
Manage current feature workflow - start, review, explain or complete
Also in 3 projects that use this
HK-hubSkilldistill
Strip designs to their essence by removing unnecessary complexity. Great design is simple, powerful, and clean. Use when the user asks to simplify, declutter, reduce noise, remove elements, or make a UI cleaner and more focused.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions47 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 47
- huytieu/COG-second-brain★ 1.3ksame name
- HazAT/pi-config★ 451same name
- OneWave-AI/claude-skills★ 378same name
- typv/nest-turbo-starter★ 224same name
- QinghongLin/data2story-skill★ 155same name
- andrew-yangy/gru-ai★ 153same name
- simota/agent-skills★ 96same name
- vaayne/agent-kit★ 54same name
- anton-abyzov/vskill★ 47same name
- baekenough/oh-my-customcode★ 42same name
37 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 43 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 47
Every write is an op. Never edit the db or the vault.
- Distinctive: line 48
Never fabricate postings, comp, dates or URLs.
- Distinctive: line 52
Never submit an application or send an email.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 43 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Scout
Surface fresh, on-target roles, ready to score. You supply judgment only (which postings are real and on-target, and their facts). Ops do every mechanical step: scout.watchlist_scan lists and rule-filters whole ATS boards; roles.add dedupes against the whole pipeline (every status, including archived), checks each posting URL (dead postings skipped, aggregator links resolved to the company's ATS posting or skipped, bot walls kept as unsure), captures the full JD from the ATS, assigns ids, creates companies, writes role markdown, role_added events and the coverage log in runs/. Do not check duplicates, liveness or files yourself.
When
Weekly scheduled run, on demand, or when the user hands you links (skip searching, go straight to step 6).
Steps
runs.start { skill: "scout" }. Keep the returnedrun.id; pass it as the run context on every op below.- Read the profile (
profile.get: Craft, Domain, Work mode, Terms, Company, Dealbreakers), the query ingredients (scout.plan {}:titles, the persona-aware title variations from Crafttitles, functions and level, plusdomainsandlocations; a salesperson's are sales titles, never product ones) and the targets (config.get:scout.target_new_roles,scout.max_queries,scout.watchlist_share_max,scout.max_per_company). Build queries from the profile, not from memory. - Watchlist boards (a capped share, never the whole run):
scout.watchlist_scan {}(all watchlist companies; passincludetitle keywords if the Craft functions are too narrow or too broad). It returns at mostmax_per_companycandidates per company, best fit first, companies interleaved, near-identical titles grouped. Drop clear dealbreakers, thenroles.addthe rest in the order given.roles.addkeeps at mostceil(watchlist_share_max x target_new_roles)watchlist roles per run (9 of 25 by default) andmax_per_companyper company; the rest come backskipped(watchlist_cap/company_cap). That is expected: do not resend them, relabel theirsource, or search for them on the open market. Companies that come backno_boardorerrorget one watchlist web query each, under the query share cap (plan.md). - Open market (always runs): run the plan's open-market queries with web search, several result pages each, and open each hit with web fetch to capture the candidate fields below (
source: "scout"). After each batch,roles.add { candidates }. Everyroles.addanswer carrieswatchlist_budget:open_neededis how many open-market roles the run still needs. - Keep going until the target: while
open_neededis above 0 and fewer thanmax_queriesweb searches ran, build the next query variation (plan.md "Yield") and repeat step 4. This holds even when the board scan alone found more thantarget_new_roles: board roles fill at most the watchlist share. Stop early only when two variations in a row add nothing new. - Early filter, every batch: drop only clear dealbreakers (Dealbreakers and Work mode components). Keep anything borderline; scoring decides. Prefer the company's own posting URL when the page links to it; otherwise pass what you found (
roles.addresolves or skips aggregator links). runs.finish { run_id, status: "ok", summary: { target, queries_run, added, duplicates, skipped_dead, skipped_aggregator, skipped_cap, sources: { watchlist_ats: {...}, watchlist_search: {...}, open_market: {...} } }, note: "<queries and sources actually run>" }. Each source entry is{ queries, hits, duplicates, skipped_dead, skipped_aggregator, skipped_cap, added }:queriesandhitsare yours (board scans count as 0 queries, hits = scan candidates), the rest is the sum of that source'sroles.addoutputs (by_source, oradded/duplicates/skippedper call).runs.finishadds the achieved source mix vs the target itself (summary.source_mix, one line in the run log); do not compute it.
CLI equivalent for links (runs.start, one roles.add, runs.finish): pp scout --in candidates.json --note "<queries run>".
Candidate fields (roles.add)
Required: company_name, title, source (scout | link | watchlist | referral | manual).
Optional, only when the posting states it: url, ats_job_id, company_domain, posted_at (ISO), workplace (remote | hybrid | onsite | flexible | unspecified), location, comp_min, comp_max, comp_currency (3 letters), jd_markdown (a short summary is fine; the ATS JD replaces it when the posting is on Greenhouse, Lever or Ashby).
roles.add output: added, duplicates, possible_duplicates, skipped (dead | aggregator | watchlist_cap | company_cap, with the reason), resolved (aggregator link -> company posting), by_source counts, watchlist_budget (max, added, remaining, max_per_company, open_added, open_needed).
Skill files
plan.md ships next to this file in the repo (skills/scout/plan.md), not in the vault. A headless run gets it inlined in its prompt; in a live session read it from the repo. Never look for it (or this file) with vault.read.
Tools
A headless run pre-approves exactly these (SKILL_GRANTS in packages/engine/runners/grants.ts; a test keeps this list and that one equal) and denies everything else. If one you need is denied or missing, do not work around it: runs.finish { run_id, status: "error", summary: { error: "tool denied: <tool>", denied_tools: [...] } }.
{{tool:pp}}: the pp MCP tools (every Perfect Placement read and write is an op).{{tool:web.search}}: run the plan's queries on job boards and the open market.{{tool:web.fetch}}: open each hit to capture the candidate fields.
Rules
- Every write is an op. Never edit the db or the vault.
- Never fabricate postings, comp, dates or URLs. Record the source for every candidate.
- LinkedIn job pages: read only through the user's signed-in browser, slowly; never message or connect. Never store a LinkedIn or other aggregator URL as the posting:
roles.addresolves it or skips it. - Scout never scores. Hand off to the score skill next.
- The watchlist is at most its share of a run's adds. Never label a board or watchlist role
scoutto get past the cap. - Never submit an application or send an email.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

