agentleFS
askoulwassimaskoulwassim/perfect-placement/skills/tailor/SKILL.md

tailor

Skill3 starsChanged 34 days agoMITView on GitHub

Tailor the resume, write a matching cover letter and a fit map for one role from the full JD and the user's Story and Voice components, then save the package with the `apply.tailor` op, which moves the role to draft-ready. Truth only, no em dashes. Never submits.

9 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Every write is an op. Never submit an application or send an email.

    line 43

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Tailor

A role-specific resume and cover letter that map the user's real evidence to the JD, truthfully.

When

A role is active, held or on-deck (or draft-ready, to re-tailor) and you have the full JD. Starting Tailor picks an active or held role (-> on-deck, role_picked, #105); apply.tailor then moves it on-deck -> draft-ready. If roles.get shows only a title or header, open the posting and capture the full JD first. If the posting is closed, stop: freshness (roles.check_freshness) archives dead postings, not this skill.

Inputs

  • roles.get { role_id }: role, company, md_body (the JD), application.
  • profile.get: Story and the kept source resume (story.source_path, read it with vault.read; the kept resume is a vault file) are the only sources of facts and metrics; Voice is the style.
  • The company dossier (company.md_path) if research ran.

Steps

  1. runs.start { skill: "tailor", role_id }.
  2. Parse the JD: mandate, top 6 to 10 requirements, must-have keywords, seniority.
  3. Fit map: each requirement -> the strongest real evidence, citing the source line it comes from (the resume line or Story entry, quoted); mark gaps honestly.
  4. Resume: adjust the summary to the role, reorder and emphasize bullets, weave keywords in truthfully. Every number, year, date, title, employer and degree must appear in the source resume or Story exactly as written: no totals, no rounding, no "N years" unless the source says it. Role headings stay Company - Title - Dates as in the source. About two pages.
  5. Cover letter in Voice: hook, two or three proof points, confident close.
  6. apply.tailor { role_id, resume_md, cover_letter_md, fit_map_md }. The op fact-checks the resume and cover letter against the sources: an unsupported number, year, date, degree or role heading is rejected (invalid_input lists each claim; fix it from the source, never by rewording the number), and an unsupported title or employer in prose comes back in fact_check.needs_you and is queued for the user in Needs you as an apply.fact_check decision (keep, remove or edit the line; a re-tailor replaces the pending ones). It appends the claim -> source line table to the fit map. The op writes applications/<role_id>/{resume,cover_letter,fit_map}.md, upserts the application and moves the role to draft-ready (a freed company slot promotes a held role automatically).
  7. runs.finish { run_id, status: "ok" }. Next: the fill skill for the real portal questions.

Tools

A headless run pre-approves exactly these (SKILL_GRANTS in packages/engine/runners/grants.ts; a test keeps this list and that one equal) and denies everything else. If one you need is denied or missing, do not work around it: runs.finish { run_id, status: "error", summary: { error: "tool denied: <tool>", denied_tools: [...] } }.

  • {{tool:pp}}: the pp MCP tools (every Perfect Placement read and write is an op).
  • {{tool:web.fetch}}: capture the full JD from the posting when only a title is on file.

Rules

  • Truth only: reframe and emphasize, never invent. Gaps go in the fit map, not the resume.
  • Years of experience only if the source states it. Never compute it from dates.
  • Writing in the user's voice: no em dashes; punchy (hook, reframe, close).
  • Money: $212.5k / $300k or in full $300,000; never a k after a full number (300,000k).
  • Every write is an op. Never submit an application or send an email. The user reviews and submits; apply.mark_submitted is human only.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.