agentleFS
askoulwassimaskoulwassim/perfect-placement/skills/onboard/SKILL.md

onboard

Skill3 starsChanged 34 days agoMITView on GitHub

Build or refresh the user's profile. Resume in, short adaptive interview by component, 12-role calibration, confirm. Use for first run, or to re-interview one component (for example Terms or Growth) without redoing the rest.

165 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use soak-test, team-live-ops and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • lilangMaxSkill

    soak-test

    Generate a soak test protocol for extended play sessions. Defines what to observe, measure, and log during long play sessions to surface slow leaks, fatigue effects, and edge cases that only appear after sustained play. Primarily used in Polish and Release phases.

    Also in 9 projects that use this

  • lilangMaxSkill

    team-live-ops

    Orchestrate the live-ops team for post-launch content planning: coordinates live-ops-designer, economy-designer, analytics-engineer, community-manager, writer, and narrative-director to design and plan a season, event, or live content update.

    Also in 9 projects that use this

  • HK-hubSkill

    teach-impeccable

    One-time setup that gathers design context for your project and saves it to your AI config file. Run once to establish persistent design guidelines.

    Also in 19 projects that use this

  • CoralGameSkill

    project-stage-detect

    Automatically analyze project state, detect stage, identify gaps, and recommend next steps based on existing artifacts.

    Also in 15 projects that use this

  • CoralGameSkill

    team-level

    Orchestrate level design team: level-designer + narrative-director + world-builder + art-director + systems-designer + qa-tester for complete area/level creation.

    Also in 11 projects that use this

  • +5 more from lilangMax
  • +2 more from CoralGame

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 153 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Resume in: Call onboard.ingest_resume with { file: { name, content_base64 } } (PDF, DOCX, MD, TXT), { file_path } (vault-relative, e.g.

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Never ask a question the op did not return.

    line 33
  3. Distinctive:

    Do not invent answers. If the user skips, stop and leave the session.

    line 38
  4. Very specific:

    Ask the engine to start a scoped session for that component (startComponentInterview, exposed as an op in Wave 2), then loop step 2 and …

    line 47
  5. Very specific:

    Do only the resume extraction in extract.md: read the kept resume, onboard.extract (facts plus per-component drafts with a confidence), …

    line 52

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 153 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

onboard

Supplies judgment only; every write is an op. Never submit an application or send an email.

Steps

  1. Resume in. Call onboard.ingest_resume with { file: { name, content_base64 } } (PDF, DOCX, MD, TXT), { file_path } (vault-relative, e.g. files/resume.pdf) or { text } (verbatim; never paraphrase or add facts). The op keeps the resume in files/ (original + extracted text, linked from Story as source_path), shows an instant preview and returns the onboarding state. When a person uploads it, the op also queues a headless onboard run that extracts the facts verbatim (extract.md); in a live session you may do that extraction yourself with onboard.extract.
  2. Interview. First show what was pulled from the resume per component (state.resume_drafts: component, confidence, items). While state.next_question is not null, show it as given (the full-sentence label, its example if any, which component it fills, chips or slider; pre-fill suggested) and call onboard.answer with { question_id, value }, or { question_id, skip: true } when the user says "I don't know":
    • kind: 'confirm': the resume implies the answer with high confidence ("Looks like ... Right?"). yes keeps it; edit asks that component's questions with the resume's draft pre-filled.
    • kind: 'follow_up': a question the onboard agent proposed from the resume; the answer is kept in the component's follow_ups.
    • chips: one option string. multi_chips: array of option strings (order = rank). slider: a number in [min, max]. text: a short string.
    • other: true (persona-dependent questions: Craft functions, level and titles, Domain, Growth scope): the options come from the resume's persona (a salesperson sees sales functions and titles), and a free entry (Other, at most 60 characters) is accepted besides them. Never steer a user back to product options.
    • Voice: the user may skip the whole step ({ question_id, skip: true, skip_component: true }); drafts then use the neutral default style. Voice can be learned later from their own writing (You > Voice > Learn voice).
    • Never ask a question the op did not return. The op already skips what the resume or profile answers.
    • Free text the user dictated: pass it as value; the op strips fillers ("um", "you know") and keeps the raw text for provenance. Show the user the cleaned text; if they edit it, pass the edit as value and the original as raw.
    • story.years asks the user to confirm a number derived from the role dates (or leave it out). Never guess years.
    • Do not invent answers. If the user skips, stop and leave the session; it resumes later.
  3. Calibrate (state.step == 'calibrate'). Show each of the 12 sample roles (title, company, key facts) and record the user's gut call with onboard.calibrate { sample_id, choice: 'yes' | 'no' | 'maybe' }. Show the returned weights only as a radar or bars, no commentary. remaining reaches 0 -> step confirm.
  4. Confirm. Show the profile card (from profile.get after confirm, or the draft). On the user's OK call onboard.confirm {}. That writes the first profile version (or the next one).

Re-interview one component

Ask the engine to start a scoped session for that component (startComponentInterview, exposed as an op in Wave 2), then loop step 2 and confirm. Calibration is skipped.

Headless run (no user present)

Do only the resume extraction in extract.md: read the kept resume, onboard.extract (facts plus per-component drafts with a confidence), optionally onboard.propose_questions (follow-ups where the resume is silent or ambiguous), runs.finish. Do not answer interview questions, calibrate or confirm: those are the user's.

Tools

A headless run pre-approves exactly these (SKILL_GRANTS in packages/engine/runners/grants.ts; a test keeps this list and that one equal) and denies everything else. If one you need is denied or missing, do not work around it: runs.finish { run_id, status: "error", summary: { error: "tool denied: <tool>", denied_tools: [...] } }.

  • {{tool:pp}}: the pp MCP tools (every Perfect Placement read and write is an op).

Rules

  • The user is the only source of preferences. If you run this as an agent (not on the user's behalf in a live session), any change to Work mode, Terms or Dealbreakers becomes a pending diff for the user, never a direct write.
  • UI copy: buttons and labels of one to three words, no tips, one primary action per screen. Interview questions are full, plain sentences with an optional one-line example (wave1-decisions #28).
  • Writing in the user's voice: no em dashes.
  • Facts come from the resume or the user, verbatim. Never infer a number.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.