onboard
Skill3 starsChanged 34 days agoMITView on GitHub
Build or refresh the user's profile. Resume in, short adaptive interview by component, 12-role calibration, confirm. Use for first run, or to re-interview one component (for example Terms or Growth) without redoing the rest.
165 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ggoosen/Digital-Workforcetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- joeldevz/skynex-pitheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- eggs-gd/career-spacetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Codename-11/SubFrametheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- passion4it-gmbh/passionfruit-sitetheir own version, first seen Nov 5, 2026
- striderZA/OpenCodeGameStudiostheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use soak-test, team-live-ops and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
lilangMaxSkillsoak-test
Generate a soak test protocol for extended play sessions. Defines what to observe, measure, and log during long play sessions to surface slow leaks, fatigue effects, and edge cases that only appear after sustained play. Primarily used in Polish and Release phases.
Also in 9 projects that use this
lilangMaxSkillteam-live-ops
Orchestrate the live-ops team for post-launch content planning: coordinates live-ops-designer, economy-designer, analytics-engineer, community-manager, writer, and narrative-director to design and plan a season, event, or live content update.
Also in 9 projects that use this
HK-hubSkillteach-impeccable
One-time setup that gathers design context for your project and saves it to your AI config file. Run once to establish persistent design guidelines.
Also in 19 projects that use this
CoralGameSkillproject-stage-detect
Automatically analyze project state, detect stage, identify gaps, and recommend next steps based on existing artifacts.
Also in 15 projects that use this
CoralGameSkillteam-level
Orchestrate level design team: level-designer + narrative-director + world-builder + art-director + systems-designer + qa-tester for complete area/level creation.
Also in 11 projects that use this
- +5 more from lilangMax
- +2 more from CoralGame
Other versions165 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 165
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 27ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude★ 3.9ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v2★ 3.9ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3★ 3.9ksame name
- nateherkai/AIS-OS★ 1.4ksame name
- poshan0126/dotclaude★ 871same name
- talesofai/cohub★ 585same name
- me2resh/apexyard★ 542same name
- nexmoe/DayBee★ 424same name
- nexmoe/eve★ 424same name
155 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 153 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 12
Resume in: Call onboard.ingest_resume with { file: { name, content_base64 } } (PDF, DOCX, MD, TXT), { file_path } (vault-relative, e.g.
- Distinctive: line 33
Never ask a question the op did not return.
- Distinctive: line 38
Do not invent answers. If the user skips, stop and leave the session.
- Very specific: line 47
Ask the engine to start a scoped session for that component (startComponentInterview, exposed as an op in Wave 2), then loop step 2 and …
- Very specific: line 52
Do only the resume extraction in extract.md: read the kept resume, onboard.extract (facts plus per-component drafts with a confidence), …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 153 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
onboard
Supplies judgment only; every write is an op. Never submit an application or send an email.
Steps
- Resume in. Call
onboard.ingest_resumewith{ file: { name, content_base64 } }(PDF, DOCX, MD, TXT),{ file_path }(vault-relative, e.g.files/resume.pdf) or{ text }(verbatim; never paraphrase or add facts). The op keeps the resume infiles/(original + extracted text, linked from Story assource_path), shows an instant preview and returns the onboarding state. When a person uploads it, the op also queues a headlessonboardrun that extracts the facts verbatim (extract.md); in a live session you may do that extraction yourself withonboard.extract. - Interview. First show what was pulled from the resume per component (
state.resume_drafts: component, confidence, items). Whilestate.next_questionis not null, show it as given (the full-sentence label, itsexampleif any, which component it fills, chips or slider; pre-fillsuggested) and callonboard.answerwith{ question_id, value }, or{ question_id, skip: true }when the user says "I don't know":kind: 'confirm': the resume implies the answer with high confidence ("Looks like ... Right?").yeskeeps it;editasks that component's questions with the resume's draft pre-filled.kind: 'follow_up': a question the onboard agent proposed from the resume; the answer is kept in the component'sfollow_ups.chips: one option string.multi_chips: array of option strings (order = rank).slider: a number in[min, max].text: a short string.other: true(persona-dependent questions: Craft functions, level and titles, Domain, Growth scope): the options come from the resume's persona (a salesperson sees sales functions and titles), and a free entry (Other, at most 60 characters) is accepted besides them. Never steer a user back to product options.- Voice: the user may skip the whole step (
{ question_id, skip: true, skip_component: true }); drafts then use the neutral default style. Voice can be learned later from their own writing (You > Voice > Learn voice). - Never ask a question the op did not return. The op already skips what the resume or profile answers.
- Free text the user dictated: pass it as
value; the op strips fillers ("um", "you know") and keeps the raw text for provenance. Show the user the cleaned text; if they edit it, pass the edit asvalueand the original asraw. story.yearsasks the user to confirm a number derived from the role dates (or leave it out). Never guess years.- Do not invent answers. If the user skips, stop and leave the session; it resumes later.
- Calibrate (
state.step == 'calibrate'). Show each of the 12 sample roles (title, company, key facts) and record the user's gut call withonboard.calibrate{ sample_id, choice: 'yes' | 'no' | 'maybe' }. Show the returned weights only as a radar or bars, no commentary.remainingreaches 0 -> stepconfirm. - Confirm. Show the profile card (from
profile.getafter confirm, or the draft). On the user's OK callonboard.confirm{}. That writes the first profile version (or the next one).
Re-interview one component
Ask the engine to start a scoped session for that component (startComponentInterview, exposed as an op in Wave 2),
then loop step 2 and confirm. Calibration is skipped.
Headless run (no user present)
Do only the resume extraction in extract.md: read the kept resume, onboard.extract (facts plus per-component
drafts with a confidence), optionally onboard.propose_questions (follow-ups where the resume is silent or
ambiguous), runs.finish. Do not answer interview questions, calibrate or confirm: those are the user's.
Tools
A headless run pre-approves exactly these (SKILL_GRANTS in packages/engine/runners/grants.ts; a test keeps this list and that one equal) and denies everything else. If one you need is denied or missing, do not work around it: runs.finish { run_id, status: "error", summary: { error: "tool denied: <tool>", denied_tools: [...] } }.
{{tool:pp}}: the pp MCP tools (every Perfect Placement read and write is an op).
Rules
- The user is the only source of preferences. If you run this as an agent (not on the user's behalf in a live session), any change to Work mode, Terms or Dealbreakers becomes a pending diff for the user, never a direct write.
- UI copy: buttons and labels of one to three words, no tips, one primary action per screen. Interview questions are full, plain sentences with an optional one-line example (wave1-decisions #28).
- Writing in the user's voice: no em dashes.
- Facts come from the resume or the user, verbatim. Never infer a number.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

