issue
Skill199 starsChanged 4 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Implement a GitHub issue end-to-end — branch, code, test, docs, and commit.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
16 rules. 0 are common, 13 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 40 edited versions we read keep these.
13
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 18
Run gh issue view $ARGUMENTS --json title,body,labels to get the issue details.
- Very specific: line 28
If no matching file exists, derive the branch name from the issue number and title: zero-pad the issue number to 3 digits, kebab-case the …
- Very specific: line 30
Create and switch to the feature branch: git checkout -b <branch-name>.
- Distinctive: line 34
Read the full issue body and any linked markdown file.
- Distinctive: line 36
Create a task list using TaskCreate for each requirement so progress can be tracked.
- Distinctive: line 38
Before writing any code, present the implementation plan to the user and wait for confirmation.
- Distinctive: line 42
Use an agent team to parallelize independent work where possible:
- Distinctive: line 49
Update TaskUpdate as each requirement is completed.
- Distinctive: line 53
Run existing tests to check for regressions:
- Distinctive: line 59
If the issue specifies new test cases, implement and run them.
- Distinctive: line 61
All tests must pass before proceeding.
- Distinctive: line 65
Update the following documentation files to reflect the new changes:
- Distinctive: line 67
SPECIFICATIONS.md: Update any relevant specification files with the latest design decisions.
- Distinctive: line 68
README.md: Update any relevant README files with the latest implementation details.
- Distinctive: line 72
Run the full test suite one more time to confirm nothing was broken during documentation updates.
- Distinctive: line 87
Do NOT push to remote. Only commit locally.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 40 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Issue Implementation
Implement a GitHub issue end-to-end: fetch the issue, create a feature branch, implement all requirements, test, update docs, and commit.
Input
$ARGUMENTS must be a GitHub issue number (e.g. 78). If missing or non-numeric, ask the user for the issue number.
Step 1: Fetch the Issue
Run gh issue view $ARGUMENTS --json title,body,labels to get the issue details.
Also check if a matching markdown file exists under tmp/issues/ by looking for files that start with a zero-padded version of the issue number (e.g. issue 78 maps to a file starting with 078-). If the file exists, read it for additional context.
Display the issue title and a brief summary to the user.
Step 2: Create Feature Branch
Determine the branch name from the matching issue markdown filename under tmp/issues/, but without the .md extension. For example, if the file is 078-my-feature.md, the branch name is 078-my-feature.
If no matching file exists, derive the branch name from the issue number and title: zero-pad the issue number to 3 digits, kebab-case the title, and join with a hyphen (e.g. 078-my-feature-title).
Create and switch to the feature branch: git checkout -b <branch-name>.
Step 3: Plan the Implementation
Read the full issue body and any linked markdown file. Identify all discrete requirements.
Create a task list using TaskCreate for each requirement so progress can be tracked.
Before writing any code, present the implementation plan to the user and wait for confirmation.
Step 4: Implement
Use an agent team to parallelize independent work where possible:
- Backend changes: Implement in
backend/following project conventions (Python, FastAPI, type hints, SQLAlchemy). - Frontend changes: Implement in
frontend/following project conventions (TypeScript, ESM, shadcn, Tailwind, Vite). - Infrastructure changes: Implement in
iac/following AWS SAM / CloudFormation conventions. - Agent changes: Implement in
agents/with isolated virtual environments.
Update TaskUpdate as each requirement is completed.
Step 5: Test
Run existing tests to check for regressions:
- Backend:
cd backend && make test(or the appropriate makefile target) - Frontend:
cd frontend && npm test(if test scripts exist) - Agent tests: Run tests within each modified agent directory.
If the issue specifies new test cases, implement and run them.
All tests must pass before proceeding.
Step 6: Update Documentation
Update the following documentation files to reflect the new changes:
- SPECIFICATIONS.md: Update any relevant specification files with the latest design decisions. Search for SPECIFICATIONS.md files in all subdirectories.
- README.md: Update any relevant README files with the latest implementation details. Ensure no sensitive or account-specific information is included (no ARNs, account IDs, tokens, or endpoint URLs).
Step 7: Final Validation
Run the full test suite one more time to confirm nothing was broken during documentation updates.
Review all changes with git diff to verify correctness and ensure no secrets or credentials are included.
Step 8: Commit
Stage and commit all changes locally using semantic commit messages. Group related changes into logical commits:
feat:for new featuresfix:for bug fixesdocs:for documentation updatestest:for test additionsrefactor:for code restructuringchore:for build/config changes
Do NOT push to remote. Only commit locally.
Append Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> to each commit message.
Report a summary of all commits created.
Other versions42 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 42
- remotion-dev/remotion★ 67ksame name
- tldraw/tldraw★ 51ksame name
- tokio-rs/toasty★ 3.2ksame name
- dataplat/dbatools★ 2.8ksame name
- aws/graph-explorer★ 486same name
- egregore-labs/egregore★ 293same name
- finos/git-proxy★ 257same name
- alamenai/terrae★ 245same name
- dedalus-labs/wingman★ 181same name
- team-attention/hoyeon★ 173same name
32 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use branch, backlog and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MindgamesSkillbranch
Use when a user asks to create a new local git branch and start issue work (for example, "create branch" or "start working on issue XYZ"). Use this for issue-based branch naming in the `type/scope-short-description` pattern and for always syncing local `main` from `origin/main` before creating the new branch, creating the local tracking `main` branch first when needed.
Also in 3 projects that use this
vertz-devSkillbacklog
Manages deferred/blocked work items as GitHub Issues with labels and blocker tracking
Also in 3 projects that use this
SentrySkillcommit
Create commit messages following Sentry conventions. Use when committing code changes, writing commit messages, or formatting git history. Follows conventional commits with Sentry-specific issue references.
Also in 17 projects that use this
Microsoft AzureSkilllint
Run all linting and spell checking for TypeScript and Rust code. Run this before committing to catch style issues, clippy warnings, and misspellings.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Microsoft AzureSkilltest
Also in 6 projects that use this
AnthropicSkilldebug
Structured debugging session — reproduce, isolate, diagnose, and fix. Trigger with an error message or stack trace, "this works in staging but not prod", "something broke after the deploy", or when behavior diverges from expected and the cause isn't obvious.
Also in 4 projects that use this
- +1 more from Azure
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

