hunt-http-smuggling
Skill2 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Lowest dup rate. $5K–$30K. PortSwigger research by James Kettle.
3 other projects use a version of this, 3 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- murrtada/bug-bounty-agent-skillsedited, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunteredited, first seen Jul 1, 2026
- hhjkjkjk/Claude-skillsedited, first seen May 29, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 3
- elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter★ 6.1k85% same
- murrtada/bug-bounty-agent-skills★ 782% same
- hhjkjkjk/Claude-skills★ 082% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository255 other files it gives its agents.
- ad-acl-abuseSkill
- ad-adcs-access-and-relaySkill
- ad-adcs-persistenceSkill
- ad-adcs-template-abuseSkill
- ad-ad-discoverySkill
- ad-ad-persistenceSkill
- ad-auth-coercion-relaySkill
- ad-credential-dumpingSkill
- ad-gpo-abuseSkill
- ad-kerberos-delegationSkill
- ad-kerberos-roastingSkill
- ad-kerberos-ticket-forgingSkill
- ad-pass-the-hashSkill
- ad-sccm-exploitationSkill
- ad-trust-attacksSkill
- hunt-ntlm-infoSkill
- offensive-active-directorySkill
- hunt-llm-aiSkill
- hunt-rag-vectorSkill
- offensive-ai-securitySkill
- cloud-iam-deepSkill
- hunt-cloud-misconfigSkill
- hunt-k8sSkill
- m365-entra-attackSkill
- network-container-escapesSkill
- offensive-cloudSkill
- offensive-container-escapeSkill
- offensive-k8s-attacksSkill
- okta-attackSkill
- vmware-vcenter-attackSkill
- credential-password-sprayingSkill
- hunt-brute-forceSkill
- hunt-forgot-passwordSkill
- post-exploit-credential-recoverySkill
- meme-coin-auditSkill
- offensive-crypto-attacksSkill
- web3-auditSkill
- ctfSkill
- advisory-miningSkill
- auth-bypassSkill
- code-injection-codegenSkill
- command-injectionSkill
- cross-pollinationSkill
- cve-hunting-methodologySkill
- decompression-bombSkill
- entity-expansionSkill
- fp-checkSkill
- method-clobberingSkill
- path-traversalSkill
- prototype-pollutionSkill
- recursion-dosSkill
- redosSkill
- sandbox-escapeSkill
- target-reconSkill
- web2-vuln-classesSkill
- evasion-av-edr-evasionSkill
- offensive-anti-forensicsSkill
- offensive-edr-evasionSkill
- offensive-keylogger-archSkill
- offensive-mitigationsSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 65
No Server header → assume hardened, but run a single quick space-before-colon probe.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
17. HTTP REQUEST SMUGGLING
Lowest dup rate. $5K–$30K. PortSwigger research by James Kettle.
CL.TE (Content-Length front, Transfer-Encoding back)
POST / HTTP/1.1
Content-Length: 13
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
0
SMUGGLEDDetection
1. Burp extension: HTTP Request Smuggler
2. Right-click request → Extensions → HTTP Request Smuggler → Smuggle probe
3. Manual timing: CL.TE probe + ~10s delay = backend waiting for rest of bodyImpact Chain
Poison next request → access admin as victim
Steal credentials → capture victim's session
Cache poisoning → stored XSS at scaleTarget-Suitability Matrix (2026 reality check)
The classic CL.TE / TE.CL payloads are NOT universally exploitable in 2026. Modern proxies are RFC 9112 strict by default. Fingerprint the front-end BEFORE investing time.
| Front-end | CL.TE | TE.CL | H2.CL | H2.TE | Notes |
| Nginx ≥ 1.21 | NO | NO | partial (H2 ingress) | partial | RFC-strict; rejects CL+TE with HTTP 400. Verified locally on Nginx 1.27 — all 9 documented variants killed by front-end (docs/verification/phase2h-smuggling-cachepoison.md). |
| Caddy 2.x | NO | NO | — | — | Hardened by default |
| Envoy ≥ 1.20 | NO | NO | partial | partial | Hardened in most paths |
| HAProxy ≤ 2.4 | ✓ | ✓ | — | — | Vulnerable, see CVE-2021-40346 |
| AWS ALB + specific upstream | partial | partial | ✓ | ✓ | Several disclosed-paid reports 2022-2024 |
| Cloudflare → S3 / Lambda chains | — | — | ✓ | ✓ | H2-downgrade attacks remain viable |
| Older F5 BIG-IP (TMM < 16) | ✓ | — | — | — | Vendor advisories |
| Citrix ADC / NetScaler (older firmware) | ✓ | ✓ | — | — | Disclosed in 2020-2022 |
| Squid 3.x | ✓ | — | — | — | Older deployments |
| Apache Traffic Server (older) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | PortSwigger research |
| Apache mod_proxy_ajp → Tomcat | — | — | — | — | Cross-protocol HTTP→AJP desync (CVE-2022-26377); smuggled request is opaque to the WAF and reaches internal AJP admin/status paths that lack the external auth controls |
| Custom Python / Go proxies | ✓ | ✓ | — | — | Frequently miss RFC enforcement |
Operator fingerprint quick-check
curl -sI https://target/ | grep -i "Server:"nginx/1.21+,Caddy,envoy→ CL/TE classic is dead — pivot to H2.CL/H2.TE if the front-end speaks HTTP/2, or look for legacy proxies upstreamHAProxy, header points to AWS/CDN → run the full payload matrix- No Server header → assume hardened, but run a single quick
space-before-colonprobe; if it doesn't 400, dig deeper
H2.CL / H2.TE (the modern dominant vector)
H2-downgrade smuggling attacks rely on the front-end speaking HTTP/2 to the client and HTTP/1.1 to origin. The downgrade introduces CL/TE confusion because HTTP/2's frame-length headers don't survive the conversion cleanly. Most CDN+origin chains in 2024-2026 use this exact topology.
Tools that send HTTP/2 raw frames (Burp Pro's HTTP Request Smuggler extension, h2csmuggler, smuggler.py) are the right starting point against CDN-fronted targets. Avoid HTTP/1.1-only test clients (curl, raw sockets) against H2-front-ended targets — you'll send the wrong protocol entirely.
Mass credential harvesting — the "collector gadget"
The highest-impact smuggling outcome needs no per-victim interaction. Instead of blindly poisoning the queue, smuggle a request aimed at a back-end handler that echoes the full request — a search endpoint that reflects headers, or a redirect that mirrors the request line. The next victim's headers (Cookie, Authorization, X-Access-Token) get attributed to your smuggled request, and the reflecting handler returns them in a response you read. Repeated on a busy keep-alive socket, this harvests live credentials from arbitrary users at scale — and it works even through a CDN (Akamai/Cloudflare) when the CDN↔origin hop desyncs. Chains to hunt-ato.
Related Skills & Chains
hunt-cache-poison— Smuggling + cache is the canonical critical chain; one smuggled request becomes the cached response for every subsequent victim. Chain primitive: CL.TE smuggle a request whose response body contains attacker HTML/JS → front-end cache stores it under a popular URL (/,/login) → de-sync poisoning where the smuggled request becomes the cached response for the next N victims, persisting for the cache TTL.hunt-auth-bypass— Smuggling reaches internal-only routes that the front-end WAF/auth-proxy filters out. Chain primitive: smuggleGET /admin/users HTTP/1.1past the front-end ACL that blocks external/admin/*→ backend processes the smuggled request as if from a trusted internal source → bypass front-end auth by smuggling internal-routed request → admin data in the response queue.hunt-idor— Smuggling attaches the NEXT user's session cookies to an attacker-controlled request path. Chain primitive: smuggleGET /api/me HTTP/1.1with no cookies → backend pairs it with the next legitimate user's incoming connection cookies → victim's session cookie attached to attacker's smuggled request → attacker reads the response containing victim's PII/tokens.hunt-xss— Smuggling injects XSS payloads into the response stream of the next victim without ever appearing in a URL parameter. Chain primitive: smuggled request body contains reflected payload that the backend renders into the next response in the queue → next visitor to/receives attacker HTML inline → reflected XSS at every visitor without any URL parameter visible to them or to logs.security-arsenal— Reach for the smuggling payload bank (CL.TE / TE.CL / TE.TE obfuscations, H2.CL downgrade probes, h2csmuggler one-liners, Burp HTTP Request Smuggler extension config) and the time-delay confirmation template before manual hex-editing.triage-validation— Run the Pre-Severity Gate before claiming Critical: the smuggled-request effect MUST land on a request issued by a different client/session, not your own follow-up. A timing delta in your own browser alone is parser disagreement, not exploitable smuggling.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

