agentleFS
ajtazerajtazer/heckit/skills/cve-hunting/prototype-pollution/SKILL.md

prototype-pollution

Skill2 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Detect prototype pollution via object merge/clone/assign operations where __proto__ or constructor.prototype keys can modify Object.prototype.

10 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use mass-assignment, csrf and 8 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • KaanBicaklarSkill

    mass-assignment

    SAST detection methodology for mass assignment / auto-binding (CWE-915), including whole-request-body binding to models (Rails strong-params gaps, Spring @ModelAttribute data-binder, Django ModelForm fields='__all__', Sequelize/Mongoose req.body spread), privilege escalation via isAdmin/role/ is_verified/balance, nested/related-object over-posting, and GraphQL input over-binding. Use when reviewing create/update handlers that persist objects built from request data. Writes confirmed findings to findings/20-mass-assignment.md.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • blacklanternsecuritySkill

    csrf

    Exploit Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities during authorized penetration testing.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • YepAPISkill

    sql-injection

    SQL injection prevention — parameterized queries, ORM safety, dynamic query guards.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • blacklanternsecuritySkill

    ssrf

    Guide server-side request forgery (SSRF) exploitation during authorized penetration testing.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • wgpsecSkill

    prompt-injection

    AI/LLM 间接 Prompt 注入攻击。当目标 AI 系统会处理外部数据源(网页、文档、邮件、数据库、API 返回)时使用。覆盖间接注入、工具链劫持、RAG 投毒、数据外泄等技术。OWASP LLM Top 10 #1 漏洞类别

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • SubhiSecSkill

    ssti

    Hunt Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) in Jinja2, Twig, Freemarker, Velocity, Smarty, ERB, Handlebars, Mustache, and Spring (SpEL). Use when input is reflected in a way that suggests template rendering — error pages, email templates, PDF generators, dynamic content systems.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +1 more from blacklanternsecurity

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Key insight: Only ~50% acceptance rate.

    line 20
  2. Distinctive:

    Look for patterns where object keys from user input are used as property paths:

    line 36

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Prototype Pollution Detection

When to Use

Audit merge/clone/deep-assign utilities, query string parsers, JSON parsers, config mergers, and any package that recursively sets object properties from untrusted input.

Key insight: Only ~50% acceptance rate. Must demonstrate REAL impact beyond just polluting prototype.

Process

Step 1: Find Object Manipulation Sinks

grep -rn "Object\.assign\|Object\.defineProperty\|Object\.create" .
grep -rn "merge\|extend\|deepMerge\|deepExtend\|deepAssign\|mixin" .
grep -rn "clone\|deepClone\|cloneDeep\|deepCopy" .
grep -rn "set\|setPath\|setValue\|lodash\.set\|_.set" .
grep -rn "\[.*\]\s*=" . --include="*.js"  # Bracket notation assignment

Step 2: Check for Recursive Property Setting

Look for patterns where object keys from user input are used as property paths:

// VULNERABLE: recursive merge without key filtering
function merge(target, source) {
  for (const key in source) {
    if (typeof source[key] === 'object') {
      target[key] = merge(target[key] || {}, source[key]);
    } else {
      target[key] = source[key];
    }
  }
}

Step 3: Check Key Filtering

grep -rn "__proto__\|constructor\|prototype" . | grep -i "filter\|block\|skip\|ignore\|reject"
grep -rn "Object\.create(null)" .  # Null prototype objects are safe
grep -rn "hasOwnProperty\|Object\.keys\|Object\.entries" .

Step 4: Assess Impact

Prototype pollution alone is often not enough. Look for impact:

  • DoS: Polluted property causes TypeError crash (toString, valueOf)
  • Property injection: Polluted property affects security logic (isAdmin, role, auth)
  • Gadget chains: Polluted property reaches dangerous sink (eval, template)
  • Method clobbering: toString/valueOf overwritten causing crash

Dangerous Keys

KeyEffectImpact
__proto__Sets properties on Object.prototypeAll objects affected
constructor.prototypeSame effect via constructor chainAll objects affected
constructorOverwrites constructor referenceType confusion
toStringOverwrites string conversionTypeError on string operations
valueOfOverwrites value conversionTypeError on comparisons
hasOwnPropertyOverwrites property checkLogic bypass

CVSS Guidance

  • Proto pollution + RCE gadget chain: CRITICAL 9.8
  • Proto pollution + auth bypass: HIGH 8.1
  • Proto pollution + DoS (crash): HIGH 7.5
  • Proto pollution with no demonstrated impact: MEDIUM 5.3 (often rejected)

References

  • Sinks -- Object manipulation sinks
  • False Positive Indicators
  • PoC Skeleton

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.