cross-pollination
Skill2 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Cross-pollination multiplier technique: find a vulnerability in one package, then search for the same pattern across all similar packages to multiply findings.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Dragoon0x/taste-skillstheir own version, first seen Feb 26, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- Dragoon0x/taste-skills★ 5same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository255 other files it gives its agents.
- ad-acl-abuseSkill
- ad-adcs-access-and-relaySkill
- ad-adcs-persistenceSkill
- ad-adcs-template-abuseSkill
- ad-ad-discoverySkill
- ad-ad-persistenceSkill
- ad-auth-coercion-relaySkill
- ad-credential-dumpingSkill
- ad-gpo-abuseSkill
- ad-kerberos-delegationSkill
- ad-kerberos-roastingSkill
- ad-kerberos-ticket-forgingSkill
- ad-pass-the-hashSkill
- ad-sccm-exploitationSkill
- ad-trust-attacksSkill
- hunt-ntlm-infoSkill
- offensive-active-directorySkill
- hunt-llm-aiSkill
- hunt-rag-vectorSkill
- offensive-ai-securitySkill
- cloud-iam-deepSkill
- hunt-cloud-misconfigSkill
- hunt-k8sSkill
- m365-entra-attackSkill
- network-container-escapesSkill
- offensive-cloudSkill
- offensive-container-escapeSkill
- offensive-k8s-attacksSkill
- okta-attackSkill
- vmware-vcenter-attackSkill
- credential-password-sprayingSkill
- hunt-brute-forceSkill
- hunt-forgot-passwordSkill
- post-exploit-credential-recoverySkill
- meme-coin-auditSkill
- offensive-crypto-attacksSkill
- web3-auditSkill
- ctfSkill
- advisory-miningSkill
- auth-bypassSkill
- code-injection-codegenSkill
- command-injectionSkill
- cve-hunting-methodologySkill
- decompression-bombSkill
- entity-expansionSkill
- fp-checkSkill
- method-clobberingSkill
- path-traversalSkill
- prototype-pollutionSkill
- recursion-dosSkill
- redosSkill
- sandbox-escapeSkill
- target-reconSkill
- web2-vuln-classesSkill
- evasion-av-edr-evasionSkill
- offensive-anti-forensicsSkill
- offensive-edr-evasionSkill
- offensive-keylogger-archSkill
- offensive-mitigationsSkill
- offensive-waf-bypassSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈8
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 20
After confirming a vulnerability in package-A, use this technique to find the same vulnerable pattern in packages B through Z.
- Distinctive: line 38
Before cross-pollinating, ensure the original finding is confirmed:
- Distinctive: line 65
Start with a specific pattern, then broaden if too few results
- Distinctive: line 67
Look at file context, not just the matching line
- Distinctive: line 123
If you have multiple repos cloned locally:
- Distinctive: line 134
When grep.app returns 50+ matches:
- Distinctive: line 137
Second pass: Check for existing CVEs (skip if already reported)
- Distinctive: line 138
Third pass: Verify user input reaches the pattern
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Cross-Pollination -- Multiplying Findings
When to Use
After confirming a vulnerability in package-A, use this technique to find the same vulnerable pattern in packages B through Z. One finding can multiply into 5-20 findings.
The Multiplier Effect
| Starting Finding | Pattern | Typical Yield |
| Entity expansion in XML parser A | All XML parsers with no entity limit | 3-8 findings |
| Zip Slip in archive lib A | All archive extraction libs | 2-5 findings |
| Proto pollution in merge lib A | All deep merge/clone libs | 5-10 findings |
| ReDoS in validator A | All validators using same regex pattern | 3-7 findings |
| Code injection in schema validator A | All schema validators with code gen | 2-5 findings |
| Recursion DoS in serializer A | All recursive serializers | 5-15 findings |
| Method clobbering in parser A | All parsers creating objects from input | 3-8 findings |
Process
Step 1: Confirm the Original Finding
Before cross-pollinating, ensure the original finding is confirmed:
- PoC works
- fp-check passes
- Submitted or ready to submit
Step 2: Extract the Vulnerable Pattern
Identify the core vulnerable code pattern as a regex:
# Example: recursive function without depth limit
Pattern: function\s+\w+\(.*\)\s*\{.*\w+\( (self-call without depth check)
# Example: new Function with template literal
Pattern: new\s+Function\s*\(.*\$\{
# Example: path.join without startsWith check
Pattern: path\.join\(.*req\.(params|body|query)Step 3: Search via grep.app
https://grep.app/search?q=PATTERN®exp=true&filter[lang][0]=JavaScriptTips:
- Start with a specific pattern, then broaden if too few results
- Filter by language to reduce noise
- Look at file context, not just the matching line
- Skip node_modules, test files, documentation
Step 4: Evaluate Each Match
For each match:
- Is this a different package? (not a fork/copy of the original)
- Does user input reach this code? (trace the data flow)
- Is the pattern actually vulnerable in this context? (check for mitigations)
- Does the package have enough usage to warrant a CVE? (check downloads)
- Does a CVE already exist for this package? (check NVD)
Step 5: Submit Findings
For each confirmed vulnerable package:
- Apply fp-check
- Build PoC adapted to this package
- Submit via appropriate channel (GHSA, email, HackerOne)
grep.app Usage
URL Format
https://grep.app/search?q=QUERY®exp=true&filter[lang][0]=LANGUAGEParameters
q: Search query (URL-encoded)regexp: true/false for regex modefilter[lang][0]: Language filter (JavaScript, Python, Go, Ruby, etc.)page: Pagination
Useful Regex Patterns
# new Function with interpolation
new\s+Function\s*\(.*\$\{
# eval with concatenation
eval\s*\(.*\+
# Recursive function without depth
function\s+\w+.*\{[^}]*\1\(
# path.join with user input
path\.join\(.*req\.(params|body|query)
# XML parser without entity config
new\s+XMLParser\s*\(\s*\)
# Deep merge without proto check
function\s+\w*merge.*for.*in.*source.*\[key\]Local Cross-Repo Search
If you have multiple repos cloned locally:
# Search across all cloned repos
rg "PATTERN" targets/ --type js --glob '!node_modules'
# Count matches per repo
rg "PATTERN" targets/ --type js --glob '!node_modules' --countScaling: Processing Many Matches
When grep.app returns 50+ matches:
- First pass: Quick filter by download count (skip < 100K weekly)
- Second pass: Check for existing CVEs (skip if already reported)
- Third pass: Verify user input reaches the pattern
- Fourth pass: Build PoC for confirmed cases
- Batch submit: Submit findings in batches, not all at once
References
- Category Mapping -- Package families by vuln class
- grep.app Usage -- Detailed search guide
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

