agentleFS
ajtazerajtazer/heckit/skills/cve-hunting/method-clobbering/SKILL.md

method-clobbering

Skill2 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Detect method clobbering via user-controlled object keys that overwrite built-in methods like toString, valueOf, or hasOwnProperty, causing crashes or logic bypass.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    When a parser creates a plain object {} from user input, the attacker can set keys like toString, valueOf, hasOwnProperty to non-function …

    line 21
  2. Distinctive:

    No demonstrated crash/bypass: likely rejected

    line 86

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Method Clobbering Detection

When to Use

Audit CSV/form/query string parsers that create plain objects from untrusted input where the attacker can control property names (keys), not just values.

Key Insight

When a parser creates a plain object {} from user input, the attacker can set keys like toString, valueOf, hasOwnProperty to non-function values. Any code that later calls these methods on the object will throw a TypeError.

Important: JSON.parse can do the same thing. You MUST show why the library-specific clobbering is worse than what JSON.parse enables. Show a REAL crash path, not just theoretical property overwrite.

Dangerous Keys

KeyNormal TypeEffect When Clobbered
toStringFunctionobj + "" throws TypeError
valueOfFunctionobj == x or coercion throws TypeError
hasOwnPropertyFunctionobj.hasOwnProperty(k) throws TypeError
constructorFunctionType checks fail
__proto__ObjectPrototype pollution (see prototype-pollution skill)
__defineGetter__FunctionLegacy getter/setter manipulation
__defineSetter__FunctionLegacy getter/setter manipulation
__lookupGetter__FunctionLegacy getter/setter introspection
toJSONundefinedJSON.stringify(obj) throws TypeError
thenundefinedawait obj or Promise.resolve(obj) treats obj as thenable

Process

Step 1: Find Parsers That Create Objects

grep -rn "\[key\]\s*=" . --include="*.js" --include="*.ts"
grep -rn "\[header\]\|\[field\]\|\[name\]\|\[prop\]" .
grep -rn "result\[\|output\[\|obj\[\|data\[\|parsed\[" .

Step 2: Check If Keys Are User-Controlled

Common sources of attacker-controlled keys:

  • CSV column headers (first row)
  • HTTP form field names
  • Query string parameter names
  • Configuration file keys
  • JSON object keys (but JSON.parse already handles this)

Step 3: Check for Key Filtering

grep -rn "Object\.create(null)" .  # Null prototype = safe
grep -rn "hasOwnProperty\|toString\|valueOf" . | grep -i "filter\|block\|skip"
grep -rn "Object\.keys\|Map\|new Map" .

Step 4: Demonstrate Real Impact

You MUST show one of:

  1. TypeError crash: Code calls obj.toString() or obj.hasOwnProperty() on the parsed result
  2. Logic bypass: Code checks obj.hasOwnProperty(x) for security decisions
  3. Thenable confusion: Code uses await or Promise.resolve() on the parsed object
# Find code that calls methods on parsed objects
grep -rn "\.toString()\|\.valueOf()\|\.hasOwnProperty(" .
grep -rn "JSON\.stringify(" .  # Uses toJSON
grep -rn "await\|Promise\.resolve" .  # Uses then

CVSS Guidance

  • TypeError crash causing DoS (unauthenticated): HIGH 7.5
  • Logic bypass via hasOwnProperty clobbering: HIGH 7.5
  • Thenable confusion: MEDIUM 5.3-6.5
  • No demonstrated crash/bypass: likely rejected

Self-Check Before Reporting

  1. Can JSON.parse achieve the same clobbering? If yes, why is this worse?
  2. Does code actually call methods on the parsed object?
  3. Is the crash catchable (try/catch around it)?
  4. Is the parser documented as expecting trusted input?

References

  • Sinks -- Parser patterns creating objects from untrusted keys
  • False Positive Indicators
  • PoC Skeleton

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.