customer-discovery
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Design customer discovery interviews that produce real signal instead of polite lies, and synthesize transcripts into patterns. Use when the user wants to validate an idea, write customer interview questions, plan user research, or analyze interview notes or transcripts.
7 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- aya-taleb/biz-ready-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- AdeyStudios/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- ajstars1/founder-stacktheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- zpower426/pmpowerstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- bingyue/fde-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- ajstars1/startup-coachtheir own version, first seen Jul 4, 2026
Other versions7 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 7
- bingyue/fde-skills★ 5same name
- jpoindexter/Vanta★ 2same name
- AdeyStudios/skills★ 1same name
- ajstars1/founder-stack★ 1same name
- aya-taleb/biz-ready-skills★ 1same name
- ajstars1/startup-coach★ 0same name
- zpower426/pmpowers★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- cold-outreachSkill
- competitor-scanSkill
- hiring-kitSkill
- investor-updateSkill
- landing-copySkill
- launch-planSkill
- metrics-reviewSkill
- mvp-cutSkill
- pitch-deck-reviewSkill
- pricing-strategySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
9
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Run discovery the Mom Test way: talk about the customer's life, not your idea.
- Distinctive: line 17
Ask what problem space and who they plan to interview, then generate a 25-30 minute script:
- Distinctive: line 26
Ask about specific past events, never hypothetical futures.
- Distinctive: line 27
Never mention the user's solution or idea during the interview.
- Distinctive: line 29
Every compliment is a dodge.
- Distinctive: line 30
Prefer "talk me through it" over yes/no questions.
- Distinctive: line 34
Read all notes or transcripts provided, then report:
- Distinctive: line 43
Never let the user count "they said they loved it" as validation.
- Distinctive: line 45
If every interview confirms the idea perfectly, flag it: the questions were probably leading.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Customer Discovery
Run discovery the Mom Test way: talk about the customer's life, not your idea. People lie to be nice; past behavior does not.
Two modes
Script mode: the user is preparing interviews. Produce a script. Synthesis mode: the user has notes or transcripts. Extract patterns.
Script mode
Ask what problem space and who they plan to interview, then generate a 25-30 minute script:
- Context (5 min): their role, their normal week, where the problem space fits in it
- Past behavior (15 min): the core. "Walk me through the last time you..." questions only
- Stakes (5 min): what the problem costs them, what they have already tried or paid for
- Close (2 min): "Who else deals with this?" for referrals
Question rules:
- Ask about specific past events, never hypothetical futures. "When did this last happen?" not "Would you use...?"
- Never mention the user's solution or idea during the interview.
- "Would you pay for X?" is banned. "What have you paid to solve this?" is the replacement.
- Every compliment is a dodge. Script a follow-up that returns to specifics.
- Prefer "talk me through it" over yes/no questions.
Synthesis mode
Read all notes or transcripts provided, then report:
- Patterns: pains mentioned by 3 or more people, with quote evidence
- Workarounds: what people already do or pay for (strongest buying signal)
- Non-signals: compliments, hypothetical enthusiasm, feature requests with no pain behind them. List these explicitly so the user does not count them as validation.
- Verdict: does the evidence show a problem people already spend time or money on? Yes, no, or not enough interviews yet (fewer than 5 is not enough).
Rules
- Never let the user count "they said they loved it" as validation.
- Commitment is the only currency: time booked, money paid, reputation staked (an intro).
- If every interview confirms the idea perfectly, flag it: the questions were probably leading.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

