competitor-scan
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Research the competitive landscape and produce a positioning brief with a comparison matrix, wedge analysis, and honest threat assessment. Use when the user wants competitor research, a competitive analysis, market landscape mapping, or asks how to position against incumbents.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- lorena-bordonaba-pau/youtube-agenttheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- Mehdibargach/claude-code-pm-skillstheir own version, first seen Mar 18, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- Mehdibargach/claude-code-pm-skills★ 97same name
- lorena-bordonaba-pau/youtube-agent★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- cold-outreachSkill
- customer-discoverySkill
- hiring-kitSkill
- investor-updateSkill
- landing-copySkill
- launch-planSkill
- metrics-reviewSkill
- mvp-cutSkill
- pitch-deck-reviewSkill
- pricing-strategySkill
The file
Files
Competitor Scan
The point of competitor research is not a feature spreadsheet; it is finding the wedge: the segment and angle where the incumbent's strength becomes its weakness.
Process
1. Build the list
From the user's input plus web research (search for the category, "[category] alternatives", "[known competitor] vs"), assemble:
- Direct: same solution, same customer
- Indirect: different solution, same problem (the spreadsheet, the agency, the intern)
- Do nothing: what it costs the customer to ignore the problem. This is usually the real competitor at early stage.
Cap the deep analysis at the 4-5 that actually contest the user's target customer.
2. Profile each direct competitor
From their website, pricing page, changelog, reviews (G2, app stores, Reddit), and job postings:
- Who they really sell to (pricing page and case studies reveal this faster than the homepage)
- Pricing model and entry price
- Their pitch in one sentence, and what that pitch ignores
- Momentum signals: recent launches, hiring, funding
- What users complain about: mine reviews and forums for repeated grievances; this is where wedges live
3. The matrix
One table, rows = the 5-7 dimensions the target customer actually decides on (not every feature), columns = user's product plus the direct competitors. Fill honestly, including cells where competitors win. A matrix where the user's column is all green is marketing, not analysis, and gets flagged as such.
4. Wedge and positioning
Deliver:
- The wedge: the customer segment plus job where every incumbent is weak, with the evidence (complaints, pricing gaps, neglected use cases)
- Positioning statement: "For [segment] who [pain], [product] is the [category] that [key difference], unlike [main alternative] which [tradeoff]."
- Threat assessment: which competitor could kill this company, how, and the leading indicator to watch
- What not to do: the fights not to pick (feature wars with a 50-person team, price wars with the venture-funded)
Rules
- Evidence over vibes: every claim about a competitor links to a source (their page, a review, a changelog entry).
- "We have no competitors" means either a bad search or no market; investigate which.
- Respect the incumbents: customers chose them for reasons. Name those reasons before claiming differentiation.
- Refresh quarterly; a scan is a snapshot, not an asset.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

