agentleFS
WST2002WST2002/claude-code-skills/skills/security-audit/SKILL.md

security-audit

Skill4 starsChanged 27 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when asked to review code for security, find vulnerabilities, run an OWASP check, audit before a release, or answer "is this secure?" — any language or framework, whole repo or a single feature.

  • Reads credentials

192 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use create-stories, story-done and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • lilangMaxSkill

    create-stories

    Break a single epic into implementable story files. Reads the epic, its GDD, governing ADRs, and control manifest. Each story embeds its GDD requirement TR-ID, ADR guidance, acceptance criteria, story type, and test evidence path. Run after /create-epics for each epic.

    Also in 11 projects that use this

  • lilangMaxSkill

    story-done

    End-of-story completion review. Reads the story file, verifies each acceptance criterion against the implementation, checks for GDD/ADR deviations, prompts code review, updates story status to Complete, and surfaces the next ready story from the sprint.

    Also in 11 projects that use this

  • nicepkgSkill

    community-led-growth

    Expert in community-led growth (CLG) - leveraging user communities to drive acquisition, retention, and expansion. Covers building developer communities, user groups, ambassador programs, and turning customers into advocates. Knows the difference between community as a feature vs community as a growth engine, and how to measure community ROI. Use when "community-led, CLG, ambassador program, champion program, user community, developer community, word of mouth, user group, " mentioned.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • nicepkgSkill

    ph-community-outreach

    Engage Reddit, Indie Hackers, Hacker News and other communities for Product Hunt launches. Use this skill to identify relevant communities, craft appropriate posts, and drive cross-platform engagement without appearing spammy.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • +7 more from lilangMax
  • +1 more from nicepkg

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 173 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Sweep by class: Search systematically with the patterns in checklist.md.

    line 16
  2. Distinctive:

    Verify every candidate: before reporting:

    line 17
  3. Distinctive:

    If any answer removes the risk, drop it or mark it Low confidence.

    line 21
  4. Very specific:

    Start with one line: N findings: X critical, Y high, Z medium, W low.

    line 27

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 173 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Security Audit

Overview

Find vulnerabilities an attacker can actually reach, prove each one with code, and say exactly how to fix it. A short list of real, exploitable findings beats a long list of maybes.

Method

  1. Scope. Identify entry points: HTTP routes, CLI args, file uploads, message consumers, webhooks, scheduled jobs. Note the framework and auth mechanism.
  2. Map trust boundaries. For each entry point, follow untrusted input to where it is used (query, shell, file path, HTML, redirect, deserializer, template).
  3. Sweep by class. Search systematically with the patterns in checklist.md. Do not stop at the first hit per class.
  4. Verify every candidate before reporting:
    • Is the input attacker-controlled? Trace it.
    • Is there validation, escaping, parameterisation or an auth check on the path?
    • Is the code reachable in production (not a test, fixture, or dead code)? If any answer removes the risk, drop it or mark it Low confidence.
  5. Check configuration and dependencies: CORS, cookies, headers, debug flags, secrets in repo, known-vulnerable versions in lockfiles.
  6. Report using the contract below.

Output contract

Start with one line: N findings: X critical, Y high, Z medium, W low. Then one block per finding, highest severity first:

### [SEVERITY] Title
- Location: path/to/file.ext:line
- Evidence: the 1-5 lines of code that are vulnerable
- Attack: concrete input or request an attacker sends and what they get
- Fix: the corrected code, or the exact change
- Confidence: High | Medium | Low

End with Checked and clean: the classes you searched that had no findings. If nothing was found, say so plainly. Do not pad.

Severity

SeverityMeaning
CriticalRemote, unauthenticated: code execution, auth bypass, full data access
HighAuthenticated user reaches other users' data or admin actions; injection; stored XSS
MediumNeeds user interaction or a specific condition; reflected XSS; weak crypto
LowDefense in depth: missing headers, verbose errors, minor info leak

Common mistakes

  • Reporting a query() call as SQL injection without checking it is parameterised.
  • Flagging secrets in .env.example, tests or docs as leaked credentials.
  • Missing authorization bugs (IDOR) because every route "has auth" — check that the record belongs to the caller.
  • Listing generic advice ("use HTTPS") instead of findings in this code.
  • Stopping after the first file. Audit every entry point.

Made by Wageesha Tripathi · LinkedIn · Email · More skills

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.