dependency-upgrade
Skill4 starsChanged 27 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when upgrading packages, libraries, a framework or a language runtime (React, Next.js, Angular, Spring Boot, Django, Node, Python, Java), fixing outdated or vulnerable dependencies, handling breaking changes after a major version bump, or cleaning up npm audit / Dependabot alerts.
23 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- paureis/pau-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- HyperVon/agent-guidance-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- navikt/copilottheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- agentkitco/agentkit-dev-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Eliahhango/nullbyte-securitytheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- itsofficialadi/boundifftheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use incident-response, tdd and 2 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
AnthropicSkillincident-response
Run an incident response workflow — triage, communicate, and write postmortem. Trigger with "we have an incident", "production is down", an alert that needs severity assessment, a status update mid-incident, or when writing a blameless postmortem after resolution.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GoogleSkilltdd
Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.
Also in 4 projects that use this
GoogleSkillgrill-me
A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillhandoff
Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions23 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 23
- secondsky/sap-skills★ 462same name
- navikt/copilot★ 61same name
- xfstudio/skills★ 9same name
- KhaledSaeed18/dotclaude★ 5same name
- Eliahhango/nullbyte-security★ 4same name
- juanitourquiza/shipframe★ 4same name
- 0disoft/mcp-security-proxy★ 2same name
- ai4brands-design/claude-skills★ 2same name
- CodeWithBehnam/cc-docs★ 2same name
- nafeeur/MaskShift★ 2same name
13 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository30 other files it gives its agents.
- accessibility-auditSkill
- api-design-reviewSkill
- api-test-writerSkill
- architecture-diagramSkill
- bug-debuggerSkill
- bug-report-writerSkill
- changelog-writerSkill
- codebase-onboardingSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- database-schema-designSkill
- design-handoff-specSkill
- design-reviewSkill
- dockerize-appSkill
- figma-design-compareSkill
- flaky-test-fixerSkill
- git-commit-writerSkill
- github-actions-ciSkill
- playwright-e2e-testsSkill
- prd-writerSkill
- proof-of-done-liteSkill
- readme-writerSkill
- refactor-plannerSkill
- security-auditSkill
- seo-auditSkill
- test-case-generatorSkill
- test-plan-writerSkill
- test-writerSkill
- ux-research-synthesisSkill
- ux-writingSkill
- web-performance-auditSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 22 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 20
Run official codemods: when available (for example npx @next/codemod, npx react-codemod, Angular ng update, OpenRewrite for Spring).
- Distinctive: line 21
Upgrade, fix, verify: update the version and lockfile, fix compile and type errors, run lint, tests and build, start the app and check the …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 22 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Dependency Upgrade
Overview
Upgrade in small, verified steps. Read what changed before changing code, keep the app working after each step, and never mix an upgrade with unrelated changes.
Method
- Inventory. List outdated and vulnerable packages:
npm outdated/npm audit,pip list --outdated/pip-audit,mvn versions:display-dependency-updates,go list -u -m all. Note current and target versions. - Plan the order:
- Patch and minor updates first, in one batch.
- Then each major upgrade on its own, starting with the runtime and framework, then libraries that depend on them.
- Security fixes before feature upgrades.
- Read before changing. For each major upgrade: official migration guide, changelog "Breaking changes" section, deprecation notices from the current version. Check peer dependency requirements.
- Run official codemods when available (for example
npx @next/codemod,npx react-codemod, Angularng update, OpenRewrite for Spring). - Upgrade, fix, verify: update the version and lockfile, fix compile and type errors, run lint, tests and build, start the app and check the main flows.
- Commit per step with the versions in the message.
Output
Before changing code:
| Package | Current | Target | Type | Breaking changes affecting this project | Effort |After:
Upgraded: <list>
Code changes: <what was changed and why>
Verified: <lint, tests, build, manual checks>
Not upgraded: <package — reason, e.g. blocked by peer dependency>Rules
| Rule | Why |
| Lockfile updated and committed | Reproducible installs |
| One major upgrade per commit or PR | Easy review and revert |
| Search the codebase for every API listed as removed or changed | Breaking changes hide in rarely used code |
Remove --force / --legacy-peer-deps workarounds once the tree is consistent | They hide real conflicts |
Check transitive vulnerabilities with npm audit / pip-audit after upgrading | A direct upgrade may not fix them |
Common mistakes
- Upgrading everything at once, then not knowing which package broke the build.
- Changing versions without reading the migration guide.
- Silencing deprecation warnings instead of fixing them.
- Declaring success because it compiles; run the tests and the app.
- Using
npm audit fix --force, which can jump major versions without notice.
Made by Wageesha Tripathi · LinkedIn · Email · More skills
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

