agentleFS
SubliminalCodingSubliminalCoding/bilbroswagginz-skills/skills/consulting-sales-playbook/SKILL.md

consulting-sales-playbook

Skill0 starsChanged 48 days agoMITView on GitHub

Sales discipline for consulting work (proposals, follow-ups, scope negotiation, spotting scope-to-equity flips). Use when drafting or reviewing a client proposal, deciding whether/when to follow up with a prospect, responding to a cold consulting inquiry, negotiating scope or rate, or evaluating whether a deal looks like real cash work versus equity-bait.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

10 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈10

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Scope is written before the deposit is requested: If the deliverable can't be named in one sentence with a concrete acceptance test, the …

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    No spec work: No free audits, no free proposals-as-strategy-docs, no "let me prove it by building a small version." If the prospect needs …

    line 16
  3. Distinctive:

    When drafting a reply to a prospect showing these patterns, surface the pattern to the user explicitly.

    line 30
  4. Distinctive:

    Every proposal must have, in this order:

    line 34
  5. Distinctive:

    Timeline: Start date is "deposit-clear + N business days." Never a calendar date without that condition.

    line 39
  6. Distinctive:

    Equity or ongoing arrangements: separate document: If the client wants to discuss equity, retainer, or post-launch support, that is a …

    line 41
  7. Distinctive:

    If any of these are missing, the proposal is not ready to send.

    line 43
  8. Distinctive:

    If the user is about to:

    line 58
  9. Distinctive:

    Start work on a handshake → stop and require the deposit.

    line 61
  10. Distinctive:

    Follow up inside the three-day window → stop and wait.

    line 63

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Consulting Sales Playbook

This skill encodes the non-negotiable rules for how consulting deals get done here. It overrides any default "be helpful to the prospect" instinct. The prospect is not the customer yet. The cleared deposit is.

The four hard rules

  1. Deposit clears before work starts. No code, no research, no "quick mockup," no "just a call to scope it further." Deposit in the bank or nothing moves. Family included. "Friends and family rate" still needs a contract and a deposit. The rate can be lower, the discipline cannot.
  2. Scope is written before the deposit is requested. If the deliverable can't be named in one sentence with a concrete acceptance test, the proposal is not ready. A fuzzy scope is how fixed-price engagements turn into unpaid retainers.
  3. No spec work. No free audits, no free proposals-as-strategy-docs, no "let me prove it by building a small version." If the prospect needs proof, the proof is a paid discovery sprint with its own deposit. Build-first-monetize-later is the anti-pattern. Reverse it every time.
  4. Three-business-day silence after a proposal goes out. No follow-up nudge. No "just checking in." No "wanted to see if you had questions." Chasing is how cash terms get renegotiated into equity or deferred payment. If they want the work, they come back. If they don't come back, the deal wasn't there.

Equity-flip pattern detection

Some prospects will try to convert cash engagements into equity, deferred comp, or "partnership" arrangements. Watch for these moves and name them out loud in the draft:

  • Cash-to-equity flip. Proposal goes out for a fixed cash fee; counter-offer comes back as "what if we did this as equity in [new entity]?" The answer is: equity is a separate negotiation on a separate timeline, and it does not replace Phase 1 cash. Both can exist, but not as a swap.
  • "We'll pay you out of the revenue this generates." This is deferred comp dressed up as alignment. If the prospect controls the revenue recognition, you control nothing. Decline or restructure as milestones with cash.
  • "Let's just start and figure the paperwork out in parallel." Paperwork is the work. No start without it.
  • Scope expansion framed as collaboration. "While you're in there, could you also..." Every such request is a change order with its own line item, not a freebie to build goodwill.
  • Vague praise as payment. "This would be huge for us / amazing exposure / a great case study." None of these pay rent. Name the cash amount or end the conversation.

When drafting a reply to a prospect showing these patterns, surface the pattern to the user explicitly. Do not soften it.

Drafting a proposal

Every proposal must have, in this order:

  1. What will be delivered. One paragraph. Names the artifact, not the activity. "A deployed multi-tenant inbound AI phone agent with admin UI," not "AI phone agent development services."
  2. Acceptance test. How you and the client both know it's done. Usually a demo the client runs themselves.
  3. Cash terms. Total price, deposit percentage (typically 50%), payment schedule, net terms on final invoice (net 7 preferred, net 14 max).
  4. Timeline. Start date is "deposit-clear + N business days." Never a calendar date without that condition.
  5. What is explicitly out of scope. Kill scope creep in the doc, not over email later.
  6. Equity or ongoing arrangements: separate document. If the client wants to discuss equity, retainer, or post-launch support, that is a second proposal with its own deposit. Do not bundle.

If any of these are missing, the proposal is not ready to send.

Follow-up protocol

  • Day 0: proposal sent. Silence begins.
  • Days 1–3 business days: no contact initiated. If the client emails with questions, answer the questions only. Do not re-pitch.
  • Day 4+: one (1) follow-up is allowed, and only if the client previously committed to a decision date that has passed. The follow-up is two sentences max. No reselling the project.
  • Day 10+ silence: the deal is dead until the client revives it. Move on. Do not resurrect.

Family and friends

Same rules. A lower rate is fine. Skipping the contract is not. Skipping the deposit is not. The relationships that survive this business are the ones that respected the discipline from day one.

When this skill should say no

If the user is about to:

  • Send a proposal without a named acceptance test → stop and draft the test first.
  • Start work on a handshake → stop and require the deposit.
  • Reply to a cash-to-equity counter-offer by meeting it halfway → stop and reset to the original cash terms.
  • Follow up inside the three-day window → stop and wait.
  • Take equity or deferred comp as the primary compensation → stop and restructure as cash-first with equity as a separate optional track.

Say no directly. Cite the rule. Do not hedge.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.