agentleFS
Serennity007Serennity007/invest-skill/skills/dcf-valuation/SKILL.md

dcf-valuation

Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) intrinsic value modeling with sensitivity analysis

6 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    All analysis concludes with this standardized block:

    line 70

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

DCF Valuation

This skill has been merged into stock-valuation. Use /us-stock-analysis:stock-valuation for comprehensive valuation including full DCF modeling, WACC decomposition, 3-scenario sensitivity analysis, and comparable company analysis.


Quick DCF Reference

WACC Formula and Components

WACC = Ke × (E/V) + Kd × (D/V)

Where:
  Ke  = Cost of Equity  = Rf + β × (Rm − Rf) + Size Premium
  Kd  = After-Tax Cost of Debt  = (Interest Expense / Total Debt) × (1 − Tax Rate)
  E/V = Equity Weight  = Equity Market Cap / (Equity Market Cap + Total Debt)
  D/V = Debt Weight    = Total Debt / (Equity Market Cap + Total Debt)

Typical WACC Ranges by Risk Profile:
Risk Profile         WACC Range    Examples
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Low risk (utility)   6–8%          Regulated utilities, large cap staples
Medium risk          8–11%         Large cap tech, established growth
High risk            11–15%        Small cap, emerging market, cyclical
Very high risk       15–20%+       Early-stage, distressed, pre-revenue

Three-Scenario Names and Default Probabilities

Scenario    Probability    Narrative
Bull         20%           Market share gains, margin expansion, favorable macro
Base         60%           Historical trend continuation, guidance-aligned
Bear         20%           Competitive pressure, margin compression, macro headwinds

Probability-Weighted IV = (20% × Bull IV) + (60% × Base IV) + (20% × Bear IV)

5×5 Sensitivity Table Template

Sensitivity Table — Intrinsic Value per Share ($)
              Terminal Growth Rate
WACC     1.0%    1.5%    2.0%    2.5%    3.0%
6.0%     $xxx    $xxx    $xxx    $xxx    $xxx
7.0%     $xxx    $xxx    $xxx    $xxx    $xxx
8.0%     $xxx    $xxx    $xxx    $xxx    $xxx  ← Base Case
9.0%     $xxx    $xxx    $xxx    $xxx    $xxx
10.0%    $xxx    $xxx    $xxx    $xxx    $xxx

Terminal Value Formula

Gordon Growth Model:  TV = FCF₁₀ × (1 + g) / (WACC − g)
Exit Multiple Method: TV = FCFₙ × (EV / FCF exit multiple)

Rule: Never set g > WACC. Flag if TV > 80% of total Enterprise Value.

Standard Signal Output

All analysis concludes with this standardized block:

## Thesis Invalidation

After delivering the analysis signal, specify what would reverse it:

**If signal is BULLISH — thesis breaks if:**
- Price closes below the MA200 / key support level identified in this analysis on above-average volume
- FCF turns negative for 2 consecutive quarters OR WACC rises >200bps unexpectedly
- Macro regime shift: Fed pivots hawkish unexpectedly, recession probability >60%

**If signal is BEARISH — thesis breaks if:**
- Price closes above key resistance / MA200 level with volume confirmation
- FCF growth accelerates >20% above model assumptions OR interest rates fall >100bps
- Fundamental improvement: surprise earnings beat >20% with guidance raise

**Re-run this analysis when:**
- [ ] Next earnings release
- [ ] Price moves ±15% from current level
- [ ] 60 days have elapsed
- [ ] Material news event (acquisition, leadership change, regulatory decision)

╔══════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║              INVESTMENT SIGNAL               ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ Signal:      BULLISH / NEUTRAL / BEARISH     ║
║ Confidence:  HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW             ║
║ Horizon:     SHORT / MEDIUM / LONG-TERM      ║
║ Score:       X.X / 10                        ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ Action:      BUY / HOLD / SELL               ║
║ Conviction:  STRONG / MODERATE / WEAK        ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════╝

Score Guide: 8.0–10.0 Strongly Bullish | 6.0–7.9 Moderately Bullish | 4.0–5.9 Neutral | 2.0–3.9 Moderately Bearish | 0.0–1.9 Strongly Bearish Confidence: HIGH (strong data, clear signals) | MEDIUM (mixed signals) | LOW (limited data, conflicting signals) Horizon: SHORT-TERM (1 week–3 months) | MEDIUM-TERM (3 months–1 year) | LONG-TERM (1+ years)

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.