dcf-valuation
Skill433 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub
Build Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) valuation models. Calculate intrinsic value with customizable assumptions. Generate professional valuation reports.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 66
Run sensitivity analysis on key assumptions
- Distinctive: line 339
Does not account for optionality or real options value
- Distinctive: line 341
Not suitable for early-stage unprofitable companies
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
DCF Valuation Skill
Overview
I help you build Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) models to estimate the intrinsic value of companies. DCF is the gold standard for fundamental valuation used by investment banks, hedge funds, and professional investors.
What I can do:
- Build complete DCF models from financial data
- Calculate WACC (Weighted Average Cost of Capital)
- Project future free cash flows
- Estimate terminal value (Gordon Growth or Exit Multiple)
- Run sensitivity analysis on key assumptions
- Generate professional valuation summaries
What I cannot do:
- Guarantee accuracy of projections
- Account for unpredictable future events
- Provide investment recommendations
- Replace professional financial due diligence
How to Use Me
Step 1: Provide Financial Data
I need:
- Historical financials (3-5 years of revenue, EBITDA, capex, D&A)
- Current shares outstanding
- Current stock price (optional, for comparison)
- Industry/sector context
Step 2: Set Assumptions
Key assumptions to specify (or I'll use industry defaults):
- Revenue growth rates (Year 1-5)
- EBITDA margin trajectory
- Capex as % of revenue
- Working capital changes
- Terminal growth rate
- Discount rate (WACC)
Step 3: Choose Model Type
- Standard DCF: 5-year projection + terminal value
- Two-Stage DCF: High growth + stable growth phases
- Three-Stage DCF: Growth, transition, maturity phases
DCF Model Framework
Step 1: Project Free Cash Flow (FCF)
Unlevered Free Cash Flow (UFCF) =
EBIT × (1 - Tax Rate)
+ Depreciation & Amortization
- Capital Expenditures
- Change in Net Working CapitalStep 2: Calculate WACC
WACC = (E/V × Re) + (D/V × Rd × (1 - Tc))
Where:
E = Market value of equity
D = Market value of debt
V = E + D (total value)
Re = Cost of equity (CAPM: Rf + β × Market Risk Premium)
Rd = Cost of debt
Tc = Corporate tax rateCAPM Formula for Cost of Equity
Re = Rf + β × (Rm - Rf)
Where:
Rf = Risk-free rate (10-year Treasury)
β = Stock beta (systematic risk)
Rm - Rf = Equity risk premium (typically 5-6%)Step 3: Calculate Terminal Value
Method A: Gordon Growth Model
Terminal Value = FCF(n+1) / (WACC - g)
Where:
FCF(n+1) = Final year FCF × (1 + g)
g = Terminal growth rate (typically 2-3%, ≤ GDP growth)Method B: Exit Multiple
Terminal Value = EBITDA(n) × Exit Multiple
Common multiples by sector:
- Technology: 10-15x
- Healthcare: 8-12x
- Consumer: 6-10x
- Industrial: 5-8xStep 4: Discount to Present Value
Enterprise Value = Σ [FCF(t) / (1 + WACC)^t] + [TV / (1 + WACC)^n]
Equity Value = Enterprise Value - Net Debt + Cash
Intrinsic Value per Share = Equity Value / Shares OutstandingOutput Format
# DCF Valuation Model: [Company Name]
**Valuation Date**: [Date]
**Analyst**: AI-Generated
**Model Type**: [Standard/Two-Stage/Three-Stage]
---
## Executive Summary
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| **Intrinsic Value per Share** | $XX.XX |
| **Current Market Price** | $XX.XX |
| **Upside/Downside** | +/-XX% |
| **Implied Recommendation** | [Undervalued/Fair/Overvalued] |
---
## Key Assumptions
### Revenue Projections
| Year | Revenue ($M) | Growth % |
|------|-------------|----------|
| Base (Current) | X,XXX | - |
| Year 1 | X,XXX | XX% |
| Year 2 | X,XXX | XX% |
| Year 3 | X,XXX | XX% |
| Year 4 | X,XXX | XX% |
| Year 5 | X,XXX | XX% |
### Margin Assumptions
| Metric | Year 1 | Year 5 | Rationale |
|--------|--------|--------|-----------|
| EBITDA Margin | XX% | XX% | [Reason] |
| Capex/Revenue | XX% | XX% | [Reason] |
| D&A/Revenue | XX% | XX% | [Reason] |
### WACC Calculation
| Component | Value | Source/Assumption |
|-----------|-------|-------------------|
| Risk-free Rate | X.X% | 10-Year Treasury |
| Beta | X.XX | Bloomberg/Calculated |
| Equity Risk Premium | X.X% | Historical average |
| Cost of Equity | XX.X% | CAPM |
| Cost of Debt | X.X% | Credit spread |
| Tax Rate | XX% | Effective rate |
| Debt/Total Capital | XX% | Current structure |
| **WACC** | **X.X%** | |
### Terminal Value
| Method | Value ($M) | As % of EV |
|--------|-----------|------------|
| Gordon Growth (g=X%) | X,XXX | XX% |
| Exit Multiple (Xx EBITDA) | X,XXX | XX% |
| **Selected** | **X,XXX** | **XX%** |
---
## Free Cash Flow Projections
| ($M) | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 | Terminal |
|------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|----------|
| Revenue | | | | | | |
| EBITDA | | | | | | |
| (-) D&A | | | | | | |
| EBIT | | | | | | |
| (-) Taxes | | | | | | |
| NOPAT | | | | | | |
| (+) D&A | | | | | | |
| (-) Capex | | | | | | |
| (-) ΔNWC | | | | | | |
| **UFCF** | | | | | | |
---
## Valuation Summary
| Component | Value ($M) |
|-----------|-----------|
| PV of Projected FCFs | X,XXX |
| PV of Terminal Value | X,XXX |
| **Enterprise Value** | **X,XXX** |
| (-) Net Debt | (X,XXX) |
| (+) Cash | X,XXX |
| **Equity Value** | **X,XXX** |
| Shares Outstanding | XXX M |
| **Value per Share** | **$XX.XX** |
---
## Sensitivity Analysis
### WACC vs Terminal Growth Rate
| WACC ↓ / g → | 1.5% | 2.0% | 2.5% | 3.0% |
|--------------|------|------|------|------|
| 8.0% | $XX | $XX | $XX | $XX |
| 8.5% | $XX | $XX | $XX | $XX |
| 9.0% | $XX | $XX | **$XX** | $XX |
| 9.5% | $XX | $XX | $XX | $XX |
| 10.0% | $XX | $XX | $XX | $XX |
### Key Drivers Impact
| Assumption Change | Impact on Value |
|-------------------|-----------------|
| WACC +1% | -XX% |
| Terminal Growth +0.5% | +XX% |
| Revenue CAGR +2% | +XX% |
| EBITDA Margin +2% | +XX% |
---
## Risks to Valuation
1. **Model Risk**: DCF highly sensitive to WACC and terminal growth assumptions
2. **Execution Risk**: Projected growth may not materialize
3. **Market Risk**: Multiple compression in downturn
4. **[Company-Specific Risk]**: [Detail]
---
## Disclaimer
This valuation model is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice. The intrinsic value estimate is based on assumptions that may not reflect reality.Example
User Request
Build a DCF model for a SaaS company with:
- Current revenue: $500M
- Revenue growth: 25% declining to 15% over 5 years
- EBITDA margin: 20% improving to 30%
- Current stock price: $45
- Shares outstanding: 100MMy Response
[Complete DCF model with all calculations...]
Tips for Better Results
- Provide historical data for more accurate projections
- Be explicit about growth assumptions rather than using defaults
- Specify the industry for appropriate comparables
- Request sensitivity analysis to understand valuation range
- Cross-check with multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA) for sanity check
Limitations
- Garbage in, garbage out - results depend on assumption quality
- Terminal value often represents 60-80% of total value
- Does not account for optionality or real options value
- Assumes constant WACC throughout projection period
- Not suitable for early-stage unprofitable companies
Built by the Claude Office Skills community. Contributions welcome!
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 5
- HHFinAi/Institutional-Growth-Equity-Skills★ 2same name
- jpoindexter/theft-kit★ 1same name
- CAPP-Financials/Consulting_Brain★ 0same name
- rockchen1989/Stock-analyzer-agent★ 0same name
- Serennity007/invest-skill★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository137 other files it gives its agents.
- .cursor/rules/project-rules.mdcCursor rule
- academic-searchSkill
- ads-copywriterSkill
- ai-agent-builderSkill
- airtable-automationSkill
- ai-slidesSkill
- Amazon SellerSkill
- Apple Shortcuts IntegrationSkill
- Applicant ScreeningSkill
- Asana AutomationSkill
- batch-convertSkill
- batch-processorSkill
- Brand Guidelines GeneratorSkill
- Browser AutomationSkill
- calendar-automationSkill
- Changelog GeneratorSkill
- chart-designerSkill
- Chat with PDFSkill
- ClickUp AutomationSkill
- company-researchSkill
- competitive-analysisSkill
- Content Research WriterSkill
- contract-reviewSkill
- contract-templateSkill
- cover-letterSkill
- crm-automationSkill
- crypto-reportSkill
- customer-successSkill
- cv-builderSkill
- data-analysisSkill
- Database SyncSkill
- data-extractorSkill
- data-pipelineSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- devops-automationSkill
- dev-slidesSkill
- diagram-creatorSkill
- discord-botSkill
- doc-parserSkill
- doc-pipelineSkill
- DocuSign AutomationSkill
- docx-manipulationSkill
- Email ClassifierSkill
- email-drafterSkill
- email-marketingSkill
- ETL PipelineSkill
- excel-automationSkill
- expense-reportSkill
- Expense TrackerSkill
- Facebook/Meta AdsSkill
- File OrganizerSkill
- financial-modelingSkill
- form-builderSkill
- gmail-workflowsSkill
- google-ads-managerSkill
- Home Assistant AutomationSkill
- hr-automationSkill
- html-slidesSkill
- html-to-pptSkill
- image-generationSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

