agentleFS
Serennity007Serennity007/invest-skill/skills/research-bundle/SKILL.md

research-bundle

Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Deprecated — use full-report instead. Chained multiple analysis skills into a unified investment thesis; superseded by full-report's configurable --depth and HTML output.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    When skills disagree, apply these priority overrides:

    line 60

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Research Bundle

This skill has been unified into full-report. Use /us-stock-analysis:full-report with a --depth flag instead:

Old UsageNew Equivalent
/research-bundle AAPL --quick/us-stock-analysis:full-report AAPL --depth quick
/research-bundle AAPL/us-stock-analysis:full-report AAPL --depth standard
/research-bundle AAPL (full)/us-stock-analysis:full-report AAPL --depth comprehensive

The full-report skill absorbs everything research-bundle provided: the 5-phase framework, composite scoring weights, investment thesis narrative, conflict resolution rules, entry/exit strategy, and monitoring plan — plus HTML report output and configurable depth.


Composite Scoring Weights (Quick Reference)

Component                Weight    Sub-Score (0-10)
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Business Quality          25%      [competitor + fundamental]
Valuation                 25%      [DCF + relative valuation]
Market Signals            20%      [insider + institutional + earnings]
Technical Setup           15%      [technical analysis timing]
Risk Profile              15%      [short interest + options signals]
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────
COMPOSITE SCORE          100%      X.X / 10

8.0–10.0  → Strong Buy   |  6.5–7.9  → Buy
5.0–6.4   → Hold/Watch   |  3.5–4.9  → Underweight
0.0–3.4   → Sell/Avoid

5-Phase Research Framework (reference)

The original research-bundle framework — now executed automatically by full-report:

Phase 1 — Business Foundation (competitor-analysis, sector-analysis) Assess economic moat width (Wide/Narrow/None), Porter's Five Forces, market share trajectory, and sector rotation positioning. Score: business quality 0–10.

Phase 2 — Valuation (dcf-valuation, stock-valuation) DCF intrinsic value across 3 scenarios + comparable company multiples (EV/EBITDA, P/E, P/S). Probability-weighted composite IV. Upside/downside to fair value.

Phase 3 — Market Signals (insider-trading, institutional-ownership, earnings-call-analysis) Net insider sentiment (Form 4 last 90 days), institutional accumulation/distribution (13F delta), management tone and guidance delta from last earnings call.

Phase 4 — Technical Setup (technical-analysis) MA stack (30/60/90/200/365d), RSI, MACD, Ichimoku, multi-timeframe confluence. Entry price, target, stop-loss, R:R ratio. Timing signal for position entry.

Phase 5 — Risk & Options (short-interest, options-analysis, economics-analysis) Short squeeze score, IV rank, put/call ratio skew, macro regime (yield curve, recession probability). Risk-adjusted position sizing.

Conflict Resolution Rules

When skills disagree, apply these priority overrides:

  • Technical SELL + Fundamental BUY → HOLD (wait for technical confirmation)
  • Insider BUY + Short Interest extreme (>20%) → CAUTION (investigate divergence)
  • DCF undervalued 30%+ + Technical BULLISH → STRONG BUY (conviction upgrade)
  • Macro recession >60% → override all bullish signals → REDUCE/AVOID
  • 3+ skills unanimous → allow confidence upgrade (MEDIUM → HIGH)

Depth Modes in full-report

  • --depth quick (5 modules): stock-eval, technical-analysis, dcf-valuation, insider-trading, earnings-call-analysis
  • --depth standard (10 modules): adds institutional-ownership, competitor-analysis, sector-analysis, options-analysis, short-interest
  • --depth comprehensive (15 modules): adds fundamental-analysis, stock-valuation, economics-analysis, financial-report-analyst, dividend-analysis

╔══════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║              INVESTMENT SIGNAL               ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ Signal:      BULLISH / NEUTRAL / BEARISH     ║
║ Confidence:  HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW             ║
║ Horizon:     SHORT / MEDIUM / LONG-TERM      ║
║ Score:       X.X / 10                        ║
╠══════════════════════════════════════════════╣
║ Action:      BUY / HOLD / SELL               ║
║ Conviction:  STRONG / MODERATE / WEAK        ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════╝

Score Guide: 8.0–10.0 Strongly Bullish | 6.0–7.9 Moderately Bullish | 4.0–5.9 Neutral | 2.0–3.9 Moderately Bearish | 0.0–1.9 Strongly Bearish

Disclaimer: Educational analysis only. Not financial advice.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.