agentleFS
ScinoScino/fstack/skills/reflect/SKILL.md

reflect

Skill18 starsChanged 53 days agoMITView on GitHub

Spawn three parallel review subagents over the active transcript, surface learnings, and route each to a concrete edit on an existing skill. Use when the user says reflect.

172 other projects use a version of this, 47 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use poteto-help, setup-pstack and 2 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • ianclearySkill

    poteto-help

    Guides users through pstack setup, /poteto-mode, and picking the skill, playbook, or principle for a task. Type /poteto-help with a question.

    Also in 14 projects that use this

  • bnemaSkill

    setup-pstack

    Configure which Pi models pstack uses per role. Detects available provider/model specs and writes pstack's user configuration. Use for /setup-pstack, "configure pstack models", or changing pstack model choices.

    Also in 24 projects that use this

  • eryzerzSkill

    make-bot-ui

    Use when building a custom UI (page, dashboard, buttons) that should wake a Grok Bot over a webhook, when the user must provide a webhook sender key, or when exposing that UI on Tailscale.

    Also in 19 projects that use this

  • ianclearySkill

    principle-explain-the-number

    Apply before you trust, report, or act on a number you measured: a speedup, a regression, a throughput, a latency, or an eval result. Find what limits it, and rule out that it measured something other than the work you think.

    Also in 26 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 163 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Before applying any Accepted edit, present the synthesizer's full Accepted/Rejected/Backlog output to the user and wait for explicit …

    line 59
  2. Very specific:

    If your environment ships a SKILL.md validator, run it on every touched skill before declaring done.

    line 70

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 163 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Reflect

Mine the current conversation for durable learnings, then route them into skill edits.

Platform note. On Codex, the Claude tool names, claude-* slugs, and Claude built-in skills named below are Claude defaults. Resolve them via codex-tools.md.

When to invoke

  • The user said "reflect" or "/reflect".
  • A complex task (5+ tool calls) just landed cleanly and the recipe is worth keeping.
  • The agent hit dead ends, found the working path, and the path generalizes.
  • The user corrected the agent's approach mid-task.
  • A non-trivial workflow emerged that isn't captured anywhere.

Skip when the conversation is trivial, off-topic, or already covered by an existing skill the parent followed correctly. One-offs are not learnings.

Process

1. Locate the active transcript

The parent finds its own transcript file before fanning out. The system prompt names Claude Code's per-project transcripts directory at ~/.claude/projects/<encoded-cwd>/; use that path. Do not glob across ~/.claude/projects/. That crosses workspace boundaries and reads private chats from unrelated projects.

ls -t ~/.claude/projects/<encoded-cwd>/*.jsonl 2>/dev/null | head -10

Three transcript layouts: legacy flat (<id>.jsonl), current nested (<id>/<id>.jsonl), and subagent (<parent>/subagents/<child>.jsonl).

For each candidate, read the first JSONL line and check that message.content[0].text contains the conversation's opening user prompt. Take the matching path. If no path resolves, write a tight digest of the session and pass that instead.

2. Spawn three reviewers in parallel

One message, three Agent calls, subagent_type: "general-purpose", explicit model: on each. Reviewers need MCP access for context lookups (tickets, chat threads, observability traces referenced in the transcript); pick a subagent_type that retains MCP access. The prompt forbids file writes; the parent applies edits.

LensmodelPrompt template
Judgmentyour configured reflect-judgment model (default in Models)references/judgment-reviewer.md
Toolingyour configured reflect-tooling model (default in Models)references/tooling-reviewer.md
Divergentyour configured reflect-judgment model (default in Models)references/divergent-reviewer.md

Pass each template verbatim, substituting the transcript path or digest where marked. Reviewers return findings in the Agent response body.

3. Synthesize

One Agent call, subagent_type: "general-purpose", using your configured reflect-judgment model (default in Models). Pick a subagent_type that retains MCP access — the synthesizer's quality check includes spot-verifying citations, which can require MCP access. Use references/synthesizer.md verbatim, with each reviewer's full output inlined where marked. The synthesizer returns a structured Accepted / Rejected / Backlog list.

4. Structural enforcement check

Sanity-check the synthesizer's Accepted list. For any item that would be enforced more reliably by a lint rule, script, metadata flag, or runtime check, move it from Accepted to Backlog. The synthesizer already applies this criterion; this is a final pass before edits land. See the encode-lessons-in-structure principle skill.

5. Apply

Before applying any Accepted edit, present the synthesizer's full Accepted/Rejected/Backlog output to the user and wait for explicit approval. The user picks which subset to apply and may redirect routings. Skill changes affect every future agent in the org; do not auto-apply.

Backlog items file to whatever devex / backlog tracker your team uses automatically. Those are tracker submissions, not skill edits. Only the Accepted list waits for approval.

For each approved Accepted item, follow the Routing field exactly:

  • Trivial existing-skill edit (a one-line bullet, a tightened sentence, a stale fact corrected): parent does directly.
  • Substantive existing-skill edit (a new section, a new pattern table, more than ~10 lines): hand to the plugin-dev:skill-development skill and run its draft / test / iterate loop.
  • tune description: <skill path> (the skill exists but didn't trigger when it should have): hand to plugin-dev:skill-development and run its description-optimization loop.
  • new skill via plugin-dev:skill-development: <kebab-name>: hand creation to plugin-dev:skill-development. Do not invent the shape ad hoc.

If your environment ships a SKILL.md validator, run it on every touched skill before declaring done. Skip this step if it doesn't.

6. Summarize for the user

Short list, no preamble:

  • Edits applied: <skill path>. What changed, one line each.
  • New skills created: <skill path>. One line each (rare).
  • Backlog filed to the devex tracker: <issue title> (<tags>). One line each.
  • Dropped: one line per rejected finding + reason from the synthesizer.

Models

Role defaults live in repo-root models.json. /setup-fstack writes a per-harness override sheet that wins at runtime.

  • reflect tooling: claude-opus-5
  • reflect judgment, divergent, synthesizer: claude-opus-5

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.