Reflect

Long sessions teach things nobody writes down. This skill audits the session transcript with independent reviewers and converts the findings into proposed edits to OMC's own skills — before the lessons evaporate.

When to use

• a marathon session just ended (or is ending) and went well or badly in ways worth banking
• the user asks "what did we learn", "bank this session", or says reflect

When not to use

• routine sessions with nothing anomalous — reflection on nothing is noise
• the user wants a summary of what happened — ketchup does that

Workflow

1. Locate the transcript for this session and hand each reviewer the path, not a paste — reviewers read it themselves.
2. Seat the panel: three read-only reviewers in one message, in the background, each with one lens:
   • tooling reviewer — which commands, skills, and agents helped or wasted time; what a script or skill should have existed
   • judgment reviewer — where calls were wrong, late, or unverifiable; which principle would have caught it
   • divergent reviewer — the alternative approaches never tried; what a fresh agent would have done differently Each returns at most three findings, each with transcript citations. Wait for every reviewer to reach a terminal state and collect its output before Step 3 — background dispatch returns before the reviewers finish, and synthesizing on a partial panel proposes misleading skill edits. A reviewer that times out is named as missing, not silently dropped.
3. Synthesize: merge duplicates, drop unevidenced claims, rank by how often the lesson would recur. A lesson that applies once is a note; one that applies every session is a skill edit.
4. Propose skill edits: for each surviving recurring lesson, the concrete edit — which skill file, which section, what wording — or a proposal for a new skill via skillify. Human-ruling wording stays verbatim (why skill epistemics).
5. Report the findings and the proposed edits; apply an edit only with the user's go — reflection proposes, the user disposes.

Rules

• Reviewers cite the transcript; a finding without a citation is dropped.
• The panel never edits skills itself — proposals go to the user and then to skillify for execution.
• Never edit a skill inside the installed plugin cache. Before the user approves an edit, show its destination — the repo's skills/<name>/ for a shipped skill, or the user's .claude/skills/<name>/ copy — and after approval edit that destination in place. Reflection never opens a PR or pushes.
• Findings about the user's own choices are reported as observations, not corrections.