agentleFS
Yeachan-HeoYeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode/skills/models/SKILL.md

models

Skill41k starsChanged 5 days agoMITView on GitHub

Interactive setup for role-based model routing: edit team.roleRouting (provider, tier, per-provider reasoning effort; orchestrator model-only), check panel diversity, warn on missing provider CLIs.

8 other projects use a version of this.

Trending

More talk lately.about the whole repository

Dec 2025: 0 mentionsJan 2026: 0 mentionsFeb 2026: 2 mentionsMar 2026: 17 mentionsApr 2026: 3 mentionsMay 2026: 7 mentionsJun 2026: 0 mentionsJul 2026: 2 mentionsAug 2026: 1 mentionSep 2026: 1 mentionOct 2026: 32 mentionsNov 2026: 19 mentions
Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Mentions a month of the Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode repository that our weekly crawl found. There is no adoption data for this file yet.

Most recently taken up by

Who's talking about Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode

The biggest 5 of 84 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.

See all 84

Talked about on GitHub, YouTube, Bluesky and the web (84 times).

On GitHub · 50

45 more on GitHub

On YouTube · 20

15 more on YouTube

On Bluesky · 10

5 more on Bluesky

On the web · 4

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Ask what to change — one role at a time, offering the tiers and, when the user has provider CLIs installed, cross-provider options.

    line 63
  2. Distinctive:

    Write the block with a single atomic edit to the project config unless the user asks for user scope.

    line 66
  3. Distinctive:

    Before such a run, check the seated panel: if every seat is the same provider and the same model family, recommend diversifying one seat to …

    line 76

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Models

Setup wizard for role-based model routing. OMC resolves each agent role to a provider, model, and reasoning effort through team.roleRouting in the project config (.claude/omc.jsonc) or the user config at claude-omc/config.jsonc under OMC's platform config dir — $XDG_CONFIG_HOME (default ~/.config) on POSIX, %APPDATA% on Windows, the same resolver getConfigPaths() uses — never a hard-coded ~/.config path. Run omc config to see the effective values before editing. This skill reads the current routing, walks the user through changes, writes the block, and checks panel diversity. It never edits config silently.

What is configurable

Per role (canonical names: orchestrator, planner, analyst, architect, executor, debugger, critic, code-reviewer, security-reviewer, test-engineer, designer, writer, code-simplifier, explore, document-specialist):

{
  "team": {
    "roleRouting": {
      "executor": { "provider": "claude", "model": "MEDIUM", "reasoningEffort": "high" },
      "code-reviewer": { "provider": "codex" }
    }
  }
}
  • provider: claude | codex | gemini | grok | cursor | antigravity — except orchestrator, which is pinned to Claude
  • model: tier HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW, or an explicit model ID — the only key orchestrator accepts; provider and reasoningEffort are rejected for it (config validation fails closed at team start), so the wizard offers model-only for that role
  • reasoningEffort: per-provider only — Claude low|medium|high|xhigh|max, Codex low|medium|high|xhigh|max|ultra, Antigravity low|medium|high|max; Gemini, Grok, and Cursor accept no effort field. Offer only the seated provider's set — an off-list value is rejected at config load by validateTeamConfig, before any team starts
  • unset roles keep their defaults; routing is resolved once at team start and frozen for that run

Workflow

  1. Show current resolution: read the active config file(s) and print each configured role with provider/model/effort, marking defaults.
  2. Ask what to change — one role at a time, offering the tiers and, when the user has provider CLIs installed, cross-provider options. Confirm each choice before writing.
  3. Write the block with a single atomic edit to the project config unless the user asks for user scope. Preserve every other key and all comments where the format allows.
  4. Re-read the file and print the resulting resolution for confirmation.
  5. Warn on provider CLIs that are not installed (codex, gemini, grok, cursor-agent, agy) — routing to a missing CLI fails closed at team start.

Panel diversity check

Multi-model panel runs work best when the panel spans model families. Before such a run, check the seated panel: if every seat is the same provider and the same model family, recommend diversifying one seat to a different family. Two seats on one family plus one on another is acceptable; three identical seats defeats the mechanism and should be called out before the run starts.

Notes

  • This skill only writes configuration. It never starts a team, spawns agents, or changes model routing for an already-running team.
  • delegationRouting is partially deprecated: entries routing to the external Codex/Gemini providers should migrate into team.roleRouting; valid Claude Task routes (including agentType and fallback settings) are a separate subsystem and must stay where they are — team.roleRouting governs /team only, Task delegation is not moved by this skill.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.