lead-reply
Skill18 starsChanged 53 days agoMITView on GitHub
Draft high-conversion, charming, consultative, and non-salesy replies to inbound leads and inquiries. Considers real product capabilities, persona, and next steps without AI slop. Use for /lead-reply, "draft reply to lead", or sales inquiries.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- donnybacondigital-debug/claude-code-business-kittheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- donnybacondigital-debug/claude-code-business-kit★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository75 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- architectSkill
- arenaSkill
- automate-meSkill
- babysitSkill
- blast-radiusSkill
- broSkill
- browseSkill
- ceo-reviewSkill
- changelog-to-postSkill
- create-verification-skillSkill
- customer-lensSkill
- deslopSkill
- engineer-modeSkill
- figure-it-outSkill
- fix-ciSkill
- fix-merge-conflictsSkill
- founder-modeSkill
- founder-voiceSkill
- fstackSkill
- geo-pageSkill
- get-pr-commentsSkill
- howSkill
- inbox-triageSkill
- interrogateSkill
- maintain-verification-skillSkill
- make-pr-easy-to-reviewSkill
- no-commentsSkill
- office-hoursSkill
- poteto-modeSkill
- principle-attack-the-premiseSkill
- principle-boundary-disciplineSkill
- principle-build-the-leverSkill
- principle-clear-namingSkill
- principle-encode-lessons-in-structureSkill
- principle-exhaust-the-design-spaceSkill
- principle-experience-firstSkill
- principle-fix-root-causesSkill
- principle-foundational-thinkingSkill
- principle-guard-the-context-windowSkill
- principle-laziness-protocolSkill
- principle-make-operations-idempotentSkill
- principle-migrate-callers-then-delete-legacy-apisSkill
- principle-minimize-reader-loadSkill
- principle-model-the-domainSkill
- principle-never-block-on-the-humanSkill
- principle-outcome-oriented-executionSkill
- principle-prove-it-worksSkill
- principle-redesign-from-first-principlesSkill
- principle-separate-before-serializing-shared-stateSkill
- principle-sequence-verifiable-unitsSkill
- principle-subtract-before-you-addSkill
- principle-test-behavior-not-implementationSkill
- principle-type-system-disciplineSkill
- recallSkill
- reflectSkill
- retroSkill
- setup-fstackSkill
- show-me-your-workSkill
- social-postSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
Use whenever you need to reply to:
- Distinctive: line 29
If the product does it: state how simply and clearly.
- Distinctive: line 35
Use short paragraphs (1-3 sentences max).
- Distinctive: line 48
Check the current project state (README, documentation, pricing, code):
- Distinctive: line 59
Don't push a heavy calendar link if an async answer suffices.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Lead Reply
Turn raw inbound lead inquiries, demo requests, and sales emails into authentic, high-converting replies that sound like a passionate, thoughtful founder—not a spammy SDR or automated AI robot.
When to Invoke
Use whenever you need to reply to:
- A potential customer reaching out via contact form or email.
- A prospect asking whether your product supports specific features or integrations.
- An enterprise or SMB asking about pricing, security, or enterprise tiers.
- A warm introduction from an investor or mutual connection.
Core Philosophy: The Anti-SDR Posture
- Be a Consultative Builder, Not a Pitch Machine:
- Talk founder-to-founder (or engineer-to-engineer).
- Answer their direct question in the first 2 sentences. Never dodge with "That's a great question, let's jump on a 30-minute discovery call to discuss your synergies."
- Honesty on Capabilities:
- If the product does it: state how simply and clearly.
- If the product doesn't do it yet: say so plainly ("We don't support X today because we're focused on nailing Y. If X is a hard blocker for you, we might not be the best fit right now, but here's how some teams work around it..."). Brutal honesty builds immediate trust.
- Zero Robotic Slop:
- No "I hope this email finds you well".
- No "I would love to pick your brain".
- No "revolutionary," "game-changing," "seamlessly integrate".
- Use short paragraphs (1-3 sentences max). Write like you type in Slack or Apple Mail on a phone.
The Workflow
Step 1: Analyze the Inbound
Extract and classify:
- Persona: Are they a solo developer, technical founder, VP Engineering, or procurement manager?
- Specific Needs & Pain: What problem are they trying to solve right now?
- Subtext & Urgency: Are they evaluating 3 competitors? Do they have a deadline?
Step 2: Cross-Reference Product Reality
Check the current project state (README, documentation, pricing, code):
- What is supported in production today?
- What requires custom enterprise setup?
- What is out of scope?
Step 3: Draft the Response
Structure:
- Direct Greeting: First name only ("Hey Alex,").
- Direct Answer First: Address their main question immediately.
- Context / Proof: 1-2 sentences on how existing users or you personally use it.
- Low-Friction Next Step:
- Don't push a heavy calendar link if an async answer suffices.
- Give an option: "Happy to spin up a quick sandbox for you to test, or if you prefer a 15-min walkthrough, grab any slot here [link]."
- Sign-off: Warm, informal ("Best, / Cheers, / Talk soon," + Founder Name).
Step 4: Polish with /unslop-email
Pass the draft through the unslop email principles to remove any residual corporate stiffness.
Example Output
Hey Sarah,
Yes, we handle Webhook retries with exponential backoff out of the box. If your endpoint is down, we buffer events for up to 72 hours and alert you in Slack.
Regarding SOC2: we're currently Type I certified and our Type II audit finishes in Q3. I can share our security packet and bridge letter if you need them for compliance.
If you'd like to test it out on a staging project, here's a link to skip the waitlist [link]. Or if you prefer a quick 15-min technical walkthrough, feel free to grab a time that works for you: [link].
Best,
FabioDoes it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

