agentleFS
SWEStashSWEStash/swe-workflow-skills/skills/effort-estimation/SKILL.md

effort-estimation

Skill1 starsChanged 5 days agoMITView on GitHub

Estimate engineering effort with agile techniques — story points, t-shirt sizing, three-point estimation, capacity planning.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    KISS: Use the simplest estimation method appropriate.

    line 55
  2. Distinctive:

    YAGNI: Don't estimate items far in the future with precision.

    line 57

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Effort Estimation

Produce honest, useful estimates without false precision. Estimates are forecasts, not commitments — always ranges, always improving as you learn more.

Workflow

Step 1: Ensure Tasks Are Defined

You can't estimate undefined work. Tasks must be broken down (use feature-planning if not), have acceptance criteria, and have at least a sketched technical approach. "I can't estimate this until we do a spike" is a valid and responsible answer.

Step 2: Choose the Method

T-shirt sizing for roadmap and early-stage sizing; story points (Fibonacci) for sprint planning and velocity tracking; three-point estimation for budget requests and high-uncertainty, high-stakes work; time-based only for well-understood tasks. See references/estimation-methods.md for detailed guidance on each method.

Step 3: Apply It

Estimate per task, not the project as a single unit; relative to known work rather than in absolute terms; as a team where possible (the familiarity gap between estimators reveals hidden complexity); with uncertainty explicit. Re-estimate when spikes complete or requirements clarify.

Step 4: Translate for Stakeholders

Convert to time or cost via team velocity or loaded cost, add a 20-30% buffer for unknowns, and communicate a range in stakeholder language — weeks and dollars, not story points. A single number becomes a commitment; a range communicates confidence.

Say when the number gets revisited. A range nobody revisits hardens into the commitment you avoided giving — so hand over the estimate with its re-forecast attached: the next point where real data replaces assumption (a phase boundary, the end of a spike, the first sprints of actuals), and what would move the number. That sentence is what keeps an early-discovery estimate honest; without it, "wide range" is just a number the stakeholder rounds down.

Step 5: Track and Calibrate

Compare estimated with actual — per sprint on delivery work, at each phase boundary on a project-sized estimate — look for systematic bias, and recalibrate on the last 3-5 data points, not the all-time average.

Principles Applied

  • KISS: Use the simplest estimation method appropriate. T-shirt sizing is fine for most roadmap decisions.
  • Honesty over optimism: A realistic estimate that disappoints a stakeholder is better than an optimistic estimate that misses a deadline.
  • YAGNI: Don't estimate items far in the future with precision. Estimate near-term work in detail, far-term work in ranges.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.