stage-gate
Skill1 starsChanged 53 days agoMITView on GitHub
Evaluate whether a major lifecycle Stage has complete valid Artifacts, passed required validation and Definition of Done, and reached the configured Target Stage. Use at each relevant Stage boundary before continuing or pausing.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- NinjaSln-labs/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 2, 2026
- k97/skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 19, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- k97/skills★ 1same name
- NinjaSln-labs/agent-skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adaptive-testingSkill
- architecture-decisionSkill
- artifact-validationSkill
- change-impactSkill
- clarification-gateSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- component-planningSkill
- failure-diagnosisSkill
- failure-escalationSkill
- framework-checkpointSkill
- framework-resumeSkill
- gap-analysisSkill
- implement-componentSkill
- integration-gateSkill
- minimum-pathSkill
- project-intakeSkill
- quality-gateSkill
- reverse-engineeringSkill
- traceabilitySkill
- workflow-assessmentSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
Run when target-relevant work for a Stage appears complete, before entering downstream work, or when reassessing a paused/failed Stage.
- Very specific: line 30
Check whether all target-required Stage Artifacts are complete and sufficiently VALID.
- Distinctive: line 31
Check Artifact Validation and all applicable lower-level Gate verdicts.
- Distinctive: line 32
Check every Stage DoD item at the effective Workflow Level.
- Distinctive: line 33
Check traceability, accepted risks, unresolved deviations, assumptions, and Clarifications.
- Distinctive: line 47
Do not enter a later stage because it exists in the lifecycle.
- Distinctive: line 64
Use Clarification Gate for intent/acceptance, Failure Diagnosis for failed evidence, Change Impact for drift, and Workflow Assessment when …
- Very specific: line 68
Stop after the recorded verdict.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Stage Gate
Purpose
Control progression by evidence and stop precisely at the user's Target Stage.
Trigger
Run when target-relevant work for a Stage appears complete, before entering downstream work, or when reassessing a paused/failed Stage.
Inputs
- Current Stage, Target Stage, Stage scope, Workflow Level, and Stage DoD.
- Required Artifact IDs/revisions/statuses and validation evidence.
- Applicable Clarification, Artifact, Component Quality, and Integration Gate results.
- Traceability, open questions, assumptions, decisions, risks, deviations, and Current Minimum Necessary Path.
Prerequisites
- Normalize the stage/target and identify only Artifacts required for the declared scope.
- Gate evidence must apply to current revisions.
Procedure
- Check whether all target-required Stage Artifacts are complete and sufficiently
VALID. - Check Artifact Validation and all applicable lower-level Gate verdicts.
- Check every Stage DoD item at the effective Workflow Level.
- Check traceability, accepted risks, unresolved deviations, assumptions, and Clarifications.
- Determine whether failures require rework, clarification, or rollback to a responsible earlier layer.
- Determine whether Current Stage equals Target Stage.
- Record
PASS,FAIL,BLOCKED, orUSER_DECISION_REQUIREDwith evidence and next action. - On PASS below target, update State and expose only the next ready Minimum Path node.
- On PASS at target, create a Checkpoint, set project status
PAUSED_AT_STAGE, report outputs/residual risks, and stop.
Decision Rules
- Artifact existence is not completeness or validation.
- Missing/currently stale required evidence prevents PASS.
- Waived criteria require persisted authority and risk acceptance.
- Rework only affected scope and recompute the Minimum Necessary Path.
- Reaching Target Stage means
PAUSED_AT_STAGE, neverPROJECT_COMPLETED. - Do not enter a later stage because it exists in the lifecycle.
Outputs
- Stage Gate Record with Stage/target, revisions, DoD checks, evidence, verdict, findings, and next action.
- Updated Current Stage/project status and path state.
- Target delivery summary and Checkpoint when paused.
Failure Cases
- Stage DoD or target is ambiguous.
- Evidence is stale, conflicting, or absent.
- Required user Acceptance has not occurred.
- State and repository revisions disagree.
Escalation
Use Clarification Gate for intent/acceptance, Failure Diagnosis for failed evidence, Change Impact for drift, and Workflow Assessment when Gate depth is insufficient. Roll back only to the responsible layer.
Stop Conditions
Stop after the recorded verdict. On target PASS, stop all downstream work at PAUSED_AT_STAGE; on failure/block, expose only bounded corrective action.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

