project-intake
Skill1 starsChanged 53 days agoMITView on GitHub
Discover, inspect, classify, and inventory existing project assets and initial engineering state. Use at project startup, after major input changes, when entering an unfamiliar repository, or before planning from existing work.
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- go-sphere/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- infragoodboys/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- diiiiiiylan/project-autopilottheir own version, first seen Jun 19, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 3
- diiiiiiylan/project-autopilot★ 1same name
- go-sphere/skills★ 1same name
- infragoodboys/claude-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adaptive-testingSkill
- architecture-decisionSkill
- artifact-validationSkill
- change-impactSkill
- clarification-gateSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- component-planningSkill
- failure-diagnosisSkill
- failure-escalationSkill
- framework-checkpointSkill
- framework-resumeSkill
- gap-analysisSkill
- implement-componentSkill
- integration-gateSkill
- minimum-pathSkill
- quality-gateSkill
- reverse-engineeringSkill
- stage-gateSkill
- traceabilitySkill
- workflow-assessmentSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 14
Run at initial startup, on an unfamiliar or resumed project with uncertain state, after substantial new input/ material arrives, or when …
- Distinctive: line 25
Do not require organized input directories.
- Distinctive: line 26
Do not expose secrets or inspect irrelevant sensitive content.
- Distinctive: line 30
Read Project Configuration, current State, Checkpoint, and target.
- Distinctive: line 68
Use the Clarification Gate for authority or material intent conflicts.
- Distinctive: line 72
Stop when the requested scope is inventoried with explicit evidence and uncertainty, when a blocking clarification is identified, or when …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Project Intake
Purpose
Establish an evidence-backed answer to “what does this project have now?” without treating filenames, directories, or existing files as proof of Artifact type or validity.
Trigger
Run at initial startup, on an unfamiliar or resumed project with uncertain state, after substantial new input/ material arrives, or when the current inventory no longer matches the repository.
Inputs
- User request,
config/project.md,input/, and relevant repository content. - Existing Artifact Registry, State, and latest Checkpoint when present.
- Target Stage or target Artifact, if known.
Prerequisites
- Confirm the project root and accessible scope.
- Do not require organized input directories; treat placement and extension as hints only.
- Do not expose secrets or inspect irrelevant sensitive content.
Procedure
- Read Project Configuration, current State, Checkpoint, and target.
- Scan
input/and target-relevant repository areas; record skipped or inaccessible scope. - Inspect content sufficiently to identify each asset's meaning rather than inferring from its name alone.
- Assign an Asset ID, source path, source kind, revision/freshness signal, and confidence.
- Classify candidate Artifact type and likely lifecycle stage from content.
- Determine initial completeness and status:
MISSING,PARTIAL, orUNVERIFIED; never assignVALIDsolely because a file exists. - Detect duplicates, contradictions, obsolete variants, unreadable assets, and authority conflicts.
- Identify candidate upstream/downstream dependencies and reusable evidence.
- Build or update the Asset Inventory and Artifact Inventory.
- Establish initial Current Stage, Artifact States, known Component States, open clarifications, assumptions, risks, and target-relevant next analysis.
Decision Rules
- Classify by content first; use directory, filename, and extension only as supporting evidence.
- Preserve original assets; do not rewrite them during Intake.
- Mark reverse-engineered meaning
UNVERIFIEDand inferred requirementsINFERRED. - A conflict is recorded, not silently resolved.
- Limit deep inspection to the target and material risk; Intake is not full requirements or architecture work.
Outputs
- Asset Inventory with provenance, classification basis, confidence, and coverage.
- Artifact Inventory with IDs, types, candidate dependencies, revisions, and canonical states.
- Initial State summary and current-stage hypothesis.
- Conflict, uncertainty, standards-source, and inaccessible-content logs.
- Recommended next validation or clarification, not a fixed Agent chain.
Failure Cases
- Content cannot be read or interpreted.
- Repository scope is too large for complete inspection.
- State, Checkpoint, and repository evidence disagree.
- Multiple sources claim authority for incompatible facts.
Record the failure, coverage impact, and affected classifications. Keep uncertain items UNVERIFIED.
Escalation
Use the Clarification Gate for authority or material intent conflicts. Route raw standards for one-time normalization into Project Constraints. Request specialized analysis only for target-relevant formats or domains that cannot be interpreted reliably.
Stop Conditions
Stop when the requested scope is inventoried with explicit evidence and uncertainty, when a blocking clarification is identified, or when access prevents reliable Intake. Do not continue automatically into the full lifecycle.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

