agentleFS
QuirkybrainQuirkybrain/claude-code-swe-framework/.claude/skills/project-intake/SKILL.md

project-intake

Skill1 starsChanged 53 days agoMITView on GitHub

Discover, inspect, classify, and inventory existing project assets and initial engineering state. Use at project startup, after major input changes, when entering an unfamiliar repository, or before planning from existing work.

3 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Run at initial startup, on an unfamiliar or resumed project with uncertain state, after substantial new input/ material arrives, or when …

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    Do not require organized input directories.

    line 25
  3. Distinctive:

    Do not expose secrets or inspect irrelevant sensitive content.

    line 26
  4. Distinctive:

    Read Project Configuration, current State, Checkpoint, and target.

    line 30
  5. Distinctive:

    Use the Clarification Gate for authority or material intent conflicts.

    line 68
  6. Distinctive:

    Stop when the requested scope is inventoried with explicit evidence and uncertainty, when a blocking clarification is identified, or when …

    line 72

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Project Intake

Purpose

Establish an evidence-backed answer to “what does this project have now?” without treating filenames, directories, or existing files as proof of Artifact type or validity.

Trigger

Run at initial startup, on an unfamiliar or resumed project with uncertain state, after substantial new input/ material arrives, or when the current inventory no longer matches the repository.

Inputs

  • User request, config/project.md, input/, and relevant repository content.
  • Existing Artifact Registry, State, and latest Checkpoint when present.
  • Target Stage or target Artifact, if known.

Prerequisites

  • Confirm the project root and accessible scope.
  • Do not require organized input directories; treat placement and extension as hints only.
  • Do not expose secrets or inspect irrelevant sensitive content.

Procedure

  1. Read Project Configuration, current State, Checkpoint, and target.
  2. Scan input/ and target-relevant repository areas; record skipped or inaccessible scope.
  3. Inspect content sufficiently to identify each asset's meaning rather than inferring from its name alone.
  4. Assign an Asset ID, source path, source kind, revision/freshness signal, and confidence.
  5. Classify candidate Artifact type and likely lifecycle stage from content.
  6. Determine initial completeness and status: MISSING, PARTIAL, or UNVERIFIED; never assign VALID solely because a file exists.
  7. Detect duplicates, contradictions, obsolete variants, unreadable assets, and authority conflicts.
  8. Identify candidate upstream/downstream dependencies and reusable evidence.
  9. Build or update the Asset Inventory and Artifact Inventory.
  10. Establish initial Current Stage, Artifact States, known Component States, open clarifications, assumptions, risks, and target-relevant next analysis.

Decision Rules

  • Classify by content first; use directory, filename, and extension only as supporting evidence.
  • Preserve original assets; do not rewrite them during Intake.
  • Mark reverse-engineered meaning UNVERIFIED and inferred requirements INFERRED.
  • A conflict is recorded, not silently resolved.
  • Limit deep inspection to the target and material risk; Intake is not full requirements or architecture work.

Outputs

  • Asset Inventory with provenance, classification basis, confidence, and coverage.
  • Artifact Inventory with IDs, types, candidate dependencies, revisions, and canonical states.
  • Initial State summary and current-stage hypothesis.
  • Conflict, uncertainty, standards-source, and inaccessible-content logs.
  • Recommended next validation or clarification, not a fixed Agent chain.

Failure Cases

  • Content cannot be read or interpreted.
  • Repository scope is too large for complete inspection.
  • State, Checkpoint, and repository evidence disagree.
  • Multiple sources claim authority for incompatible facts.

Record the failure, coverage impact, and affected classifications. Keep uncertain items UNVERIFIED.

Escalation

Use the Clarification Gate for authority or material intent conflicts. Route raw standards for one-time normalization into Project Constraints. Request specialized analysis only for target-relevant formats or domains that cannot be interpreted reliably.

Stop Conditions

Stop when the requested scope is inventoried with explicit evidence and uncertainty, when a blocking clarification is identified, or when access prevents reliable Intake. Do not continue automatically into the full lifecycle.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.