artifact-validation
Skill1 starsChanged 53 days agoMITView on GitHub
Validate an existing or newly produced Artifact for completeness, consistency, correctness, freshness, dependency compatibility, and target fitness. Use before reuse, handoff, downstream consumption, or a Gate decision.
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adaptive-testingSkill
- architecture-decisionSkill
- change-impactSkill
- clarification-gateSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- component-planningSkill
- failure-diagnosisSkill
- failure-escalationSkill
- framework-checkpointSkill
- framework-resumeSkill
- gap-analysisSkill
- implement-componentSkill
- integration-gateSkill
- minimum-pathSkill
- project-intakeSkill
- quality-gateSkill
- reverse-engineeringSkill
- stage-gateSkill
- traceabilitySkill
- workflow-assessmentSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
Run before consuming an existing Artifact, after an Artifact is created or changed, when an upstream dependency changes, or when prior …
- Distinctive: line 30
Verify content-based Artifact classification and provenance.
- Distinctive: line 31
Check completeness against its intended consumer and Definition of Done.
- Distinctive: line 32
Check internal consistency and consistency with authoritative Artifacts.
- Distinctive: line 33
Check correctness using source evidence, executable checks, or independent review appropriate to type.
- Very specific: line 34
Check freshness against upstream revisions, repository state, and Last Verified.
- Distinctive: line 35
Check dependency compatibility, including versioned Contracts, schemas, constraints, and assumptions.
- Distinctive: line 36
Check fitness for the current target.
- Very specific: line 47
Never infer VALID from existence, format quality, author confidence, or an old PASS.
- Distinctive: line 67
Use the Clarification Gate for authority or intent conflicts.
- Distinctive: line 71
Stop after recording a supported disposition and state, when evidence is insufficient and explicitly blocked, or when user authority is …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Artifact Validation
Purpose
Decide whether a specific Artifact revision can safely support the declared target and downstream use, applying Reuse Before Regenerate.
Trigger
Run before consuming an existing Artifact, after an Artifact is created or changed, when an upstream dependency changes, or when prior evidence is stale or incomplete.
Inputs
- Artifact ID, type, content, revision, source, owner, and intended use.
- Required upstream Artifact revisions and applicable Project Constraints.
- Target Stage/Artifact, effective Workflow Level, prior validation, and known limitations.
Prerequisites
- Confirm the exact revision and validation scope.
- Resolve or explicitly record uncertain Artifact type and provenance.
- Identify the minimum validation depth required by target risk.
Procedure
- Verify content-based Artifact classification and provenance.
- Check completeness against its intended consumer and Definition of Done.
- Check internal consistency and consistency with authoritative Artifacts.
- Check correctness using source evidence, executable checks, or independent review appropriate to type.
- Check freshness against upstream revisions, repository state, and
Last Verified. - Check dependency compatibility, including versioned Contracts, schemas, constraints, and assumptions.
- Check fitness for the current target; an Artifact may be valid for one scope but insufficient for another.
- Record evidence, validator, evaluated revisions, coverage, limitations, and resulting status.
- Select exactly one disposition:
REUSE,SUPPLEMENT,REVALIDATE, orREGENERATE.
Decision Rules
REUSE: evidence is current and the Artifact is complete, consistent, correct, compatible, and sufficient for this target.SUPPLEMENT: useful content remains and bounded gaps can be repaired without replacing valid portions.REVALIDATE: content may still be correct, but freshness or evidence is insufficient.REGENERATE: evidence proves invalidity, or repair is riskier/costlier than replacement.- Map the result to
VALID,PARTIAL,UNVERIFIED,STALE, orINVALID; do not turn every failed check intoINVALID. - Never infer
VALIDfrom existence, format quality, author confidence, or an old PASS.
Outputs
- Validation Record with scope, checks, evidence, dependency revisions, result, and limitations.
- One disposition:
REUSE,SUPPLEMENT,REVALIDATE, orREGENERATE. - Updated Artifact status and
Last Verifiedwhen justified. - Downstream impact and required follow-up.
Failure Cases
- Required source or dependency revision is missing.
- Correctness cannot be checked with available evidence.
- The Artifact mixes incompatible revisions or authorities.
- Validation tooling or environment is unavailable.
Return BLOCKED or UNVERIFIED with missing evidence; never fabricate PASS.
Escalation
Use the Clarification Gate for authority or intent conflicts. Use Change Impact when the Artifact or its basis changed. Escalate specialized correctness checks to the responsible Agent while preserving this validation scope.
Stop Conditions
Stop after recording a supported disposition and state, when evidence is insufficient and explicitly blocked, or when user authority is required. Do not regenerate as part of this Skill unless separately authorized.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

