agentleFS
Sign inStart free
PthahnixPthahnix/De-Anthropocentric-Research-Engine/skills/attach-evidence-to-relation/SKILL.md

attach-evidence-to-relation

Skill504 starsChanged 50 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Attach supporting or contradicting evidence to a specific claim/relation with quality, directness, and independence metadata.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    If attached evidence supports incompatible relation states under the same scope, consider detect-contradiction as the next tactic.

    line 27
  2. Distinctive:

    Do not attach a citation merely because it mentions both entities.

    line 43

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

attach-evidence-to-relation

Purpose

Attach source evidence to a typed relation between concepts, claims, or entities with directness and independence metadata.

Input contract

required: [relation, evidence_records, relation_schema]
optional: [quality_rubric, independence_keys, confidence_prior]
constraints: [evidence must support the relation type and direction claimed]

Procedure

  1. Identify the relation type, endpoints, direction, and boundary conditions.
  2. Match each evidence record to the relation and classify directness.
  3. Assess quality, independence, consistency, and alternative interpretations.
  4. Emit an evidence-linked relation with confidence rationale.

If attached evidence supports incompatible relation states under the same scope, consider detect-contradiction as the next tactic.

Output contract

produces: [evidence_relation, support_records, directness_assessment, independence_assessment, confidence_rationale]
delta_fields: [findings, evidence_updates, uncertainties, decisions, open_questions]

Quality gates

  • Evidence supports the typed relation rather than only its endpoints.
  • Dependent sources are not counted as independent.

Failure and counterexamples

Do not attach a citation merely because it mentions both entities.

Provenance map

  • resolved: attach-evidence-to-relation

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free