agentleFS
Sign inStart free
PthahnixPthahnix/De-Anthropocentric-Research-Engine/skills/atomize-claim/SKILL.md

atomize-claim

Skill504 starsChanged 49 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Decompose a compound position into atomic, independently challengeable/falsifiable claims and expose implicit assumptions.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Do not split a definition or condition from the proposition it qualifies.

    line 41

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

atomize-claim

Purpose

Split a compound claim into atomic propositions that can receive separate evidence and confidence judgments.

Input contract

required: [compound_claim]
optional: [argument_context, domain_terms, evidence_records]
constraints: [atomic claims retain logical connectors and scope qualifiers]

Procedure

  1. Identify subjects, predicates, qualifiers, conditions, and logical connectors.
  2. Split independent propositions while preserving dependency and quantifier scope.
  3. Mark implicit premises and ambiguous terms.
  4. Emit an ordered atomic claim set with recomposition rules.

Output contract

produces: [atomic_claims, logical_connectors, implicit_premises, recomposition_map]
delta_fields: [findings, uncertainties, open_questions]

Quality gates

  • Recombining the atoms preserves the original meaning.
  • Each atom is independently evidence-addressable.

Failure and counterexamples

Do not split a definition or condition from the proposition it qualifies.

Provenance map

  • resolved: atomize-claim

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free