abstract-structure
Skill504 starsChanged 48 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Remove domain surface details to expose transferable relational/mechanistic structure at a chosen abstraction level.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engineword for word, first seen Sep 25, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine★ 505100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository270 other files it gives its agents.
- adjudicate-exchangeSkill
- adjust-abstraction-scopeSkill
- adversarial-deliberationSkill
- aggregate-rankingSkill
- analogical-discoverySkill
- analyze-constraints-readinessSkill
- analyze-experiment-resultsSkill
- analyze-future-scenariosSkill
- analyze-heterogeneitySkill
- analyze-interventionSkill
- analyze-leaderboard-dynamicsSkill
- analyze-patent-citation-networkSkill
- analyze-scaling-regimeSkill
- analyze-temporal-trajectorySkill
- apply-perturbationSkill
- apply-question-frameworkSkill
- apply-separation-principleSkill
- apply-stage-gateSkill
- apply-veto-filterSkill
- appreciative-reframeSkill
- assess-construct-validitySkill
- assess-evidence-saturationSkill
- assess-goal-feasibilitySkill
- assess-patent-claim-scopeSkill
- assess-patent-legal-statusSkill
- assess-prior-art-and-claimsSkill
- assess-problem-wickednessSkill
- assess-publication-biasSkill
- assess-question-qualitySkill
- assess-ranking-consistencySkill
- assess-readiness-dimensionSkill
- assess-removabilitySkill
- assess-sensitivitySkill
- assess-system-boundarySkill
- assumption-stress-testSkill
- atomize-claimSkill
- atomize-conceptSkill
- attach-evidence-to-relationSkill
- audit-benchmark-validitySkill
- audit-convergence-independenceSkill
- audit-data-contaminationSkill
- audit-explanatory-compressionSkill
- audit-reporting-qualitySkill
- audit-structural-equivalenceSkill
- audit-structure-consistencySkill
- audit-study-validitySkill
- audit-validator-independenceSkill
- biologize-problemSkill
- biomimetic-transferSkill
- build-concept-fanSkill
- build-current-reality-treeSkill
- build-domain-ontologySkill
- build-failure-chainSkill
- build-noncircularity-matrixSkill
- calibrate-adversarial-confidenceSkill
- calibrate-probability-forecastSkill
- canonicalize-entitySkill
- categorize-evidenceSkill
- challenge-assumptionSkill
- characterize-anomalySkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Files
abstract-structure
Purpose
Strip domain surface detail and retain transferable relations or mechanisms at a declared abstraction level.
Input contract
required: [source_case, abstraction_level]
optional: [relation_schema, invariants]
constraints: [preserve causal or functional roles while removing incidental labels]Procedure
- List entities, actions, constraints, and outcomes in the source case.
- Replace domain labels with role and relation types at the requested level.
- Record invariants and details intentionally discarded.
Output contract
produces: [abstract_structure, retained_invariants, discarded_details]
delta_fields: [findings, hypothesis_updates, uncertainties]Quality gates
- The abstraction level is named; every retained relation has source support; no causal relation is introduced by analogy.
Failure and counterexamples
Return an abstraction gap when role mapping is ambiguous or when removing a detail changes the mechanism.
Provenance map
creative-ideation/abstraction-extraction: resolved.creative-ideation/abstraction-ladder: resolved.creative-ideation/generic-space-extraction: resolved.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.