analyze-future-scenarios
Skill504 starsChanged 50 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Construct and compare plausible future/competitive/temporal/stress scenarios and test whether the research path remains robust across them.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engineword for word, first seen Sep 25, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine★ 505100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository270 other files it gives its agents.
- abstract-structureSkill
- adjudicate-exchangeSkill
- adjust-abstraction-scopeSkill
- adversarial-deliberationSkill
- aggregate-rankingSkill
- analogical-discoverySkill
- analyze-constraints-readinessSkill
- analyze-experiment-resultsSkill
- analyze-heterogeneitySkill
- analyze-interventionSkill
- analyze-leaderboard-dynamicsSkill
- analyze-patent-citation-networkSkill
- analyze-scaling-regimeSkill
- analyze-temporal-trajectorySkill
- apply-perturbationSkill
- apply-question-frameworkSkill
- apply-separation-principleSkill
- apply-stage-gateSkill
- apply-veto-filterSkill
- appreciative-reframeSkill
- assess-construct-validitySkill
- assess-evidence-saturationSkill
- assess-goal-feasibilitySkill
- assess-patent-claim-scopeSkill
- assess-patent-legal-statusSkill
- assess-prior-art-and-claimsSkill
- assess-problem-wickednessSkill
- assess-publication-biasSkill
- assess-question-qualitySkill
- assess-ranking-consistencySkill
- assess-readiness-dimensionSkill
- assess-removabilitySkill
- assess-sensitivitySkill
- assess-system-boundarySkill
- assumption-stress-testSkill
- atomize-claimSkill
- atomize-conceptSkill
- attach-evidence-to-relationSkill
- audit-benchmark-validitySkill
- audit-convergence-independenceSkill
- audit-data-contaminationSkill
- audit-explanatory-compressionSkill
- audit-reporting-qualitySkill
- audit-structural-equivalenceSkill
- audit-structure-consistencySkill
- audit-study-validitySkill
- audit-validator-independenceSkill
- biologize-problemSkill
- biomimetic-transferSkill
- build-concept-fanSkill
- build-current-reality-treeSkill
- build-domain-ontologySkill
- build-failure-chainSkill
- build-noncircularity-matrixSkill
- calibrate-adversarial-confidenceSkill
- calibrate-probability-forecastSkill
- canonicalize-entitySkill
- categorize-evidenceSkill
- challenge-assumptionSkill
- characterize-anomalySkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 22
Do not perform called SOP operations inline.
- Distinctive: line 50
Stop synthesis when a required object is absent, a precondition is violated, or a counterexample invalidates the proposed conclusion.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
analyze-future-scenarios
Purpose
Construct and compare plausible future/competitive/temporal/stress scenarios and test whether the research path remains robust across them.
Input contract
required: [research_path, scenario_axes, uncertainty_drivers]
optional: [assumptions, prior_findings, evidence_updates]
constraints: [consume named scientific objects; preserve provenance; keep unresolved uncertainty visible]Execution protocol
Do not perform called SOP operations inline; each loaded SOP owns its contract and thresholds.
- You MUST load skill
identify-scenario-driversto rank the horizon's high-impact uncertainties. - You MUST load skill
enumerate-dimension-valuesto enumerate representative, boundary, and adversarial driver values. - You MUST load skill
evaluate-compatibilityto prune incompatible combinations while retaining near-boundary cases. - You MUST load skill
construct-scenarioto assemble distinct baseline, counterfactual, and extreme-but-plausible worlds. - You MUST load skill
evaluate-scenario-impactto score the research path inside each fixed world and record failure triggers. - You MUST load skill
evaluate-scenario-robustnessto aggregate per-world results and expose fragile assumptions. - You MUST load skill
predict-competitive-moveto forecast credible competitor moves and preemption risk. - You MUST load skill
analyze-temporal-trajectoryto order outcomes through time and reveal regime changes.
Deviation: reorder only when a dependency is already satisfied or unavailable; record the reason and confidence effect.
Output contract
produces: [scenario_set, impact_comparison, robustness_assessment]
delta_fields: [findings, decisions]Thresholds and quality gates
- Each output is traceable to an input object, operation, and evidence reference.
- Scope, assumptions, and unresolved alternatives remain explicit.
- Retain $\alpha$ 0.05 and power 0.8 wherever the predeclared statistical design requires them.
Failure and counterexamples
Stop synthesis when a required object is absent, a precondition is violated, or a counterexample invalidates the proposed conclusion; return the partial delta with the failure recorded.
Provenance map
- intermediate: experiment-execution/scenario-planning [campaign]
- resolved: morphological-scenario
- resolved: narrative-scenario
- resolved: stress-scenario
- resolved: competitive-scenario
- resolved: temporal-scenario
- resolved: parameter-space-construction
- resolved: cross-consistency-filtering
- resolved: strategy-robustness-testing
Preserved source criteria ledger
| source | criterion | treatment |
| resolved v3 entries above | node-specific criteria | retained and specialized to the v4 object contract |
| experiment-execution/statistical-testing | $\alpha$ = 0.05 | fixed value retained where applicable |
| experiment-execution/sample-size-estimation | power = 0.8 | fixed value retained where applicable |
Context checkpoint / Delta notes
Return the node-specific research-state delta and preserve findings, evidence updates, uncertainties, decisions, open questions, and recommended jumps as applicable.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

