agentleFS
ProjectWajaProjectWaja/claude-skillcraft/skills/verify-build/SKILL.md

verify-build

Skill0 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Post-implementation verification checklist run before declaring work complete.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    After implementation is complete, run this verification checklist before declaring the work done.

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    After completing implementation, run through this checklist item by item.

    line 54
  3. Distinctive:

    If any item fails, fix it before proceeding.

    line 67

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Verify Build

After implementation is complete, run this verification checklist before declaring the work done.

Verification Checklist

Functional

  • All acceptance criteria from the plan are met
  • The happy path works end-to-end
  • Edge cases identified in the plan have been handled
  • Error states produce useful messages, not crashes

Code Quality

  • No commented-out code left behind
  • No TODO comments without linked issues
  • No hardcoded secrets, API keys, or environment-specific values
  • No unused imports or dead code introduced
  • Functions are under 50 lines (or justified if longer)

Testing

  • Tests pass locally
  • New code has test coverage for critical paths
  • No tests were disabled or skipped to make the build pass

Security

  • User input is validated at system boundaries
  • No SQL injection, XSS, or command injection vectors introduced
  • Secrets are loaded from environment variables, not committed
  • Dependencies added are from trusted sources with active maintenance

Integration

  • Changes work with the existing codebase (no regressions)
  • Database migrations (if any) are reversible
  • API changes are backward-compatible or versioned

How to Use

After completing implementation, run through this checklist item by item. Report the results to the user as a summary:

Verification Complete:
  Functional: PASS (4/4)
  Code Quality: PASS (5/5)
  Testing: PASS (3/3)
  Security: PASS (4/4)
  Integration: PASS (2/2)

  Ready to commit.

If any item fails, fix it before proceeding. Do not report partial passes as complete.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.