pm-docs
Skill0 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Generates PM docs — PRDs, one-pagers, decision logs, launch checklists. Use when asked to write or structure any of these product documents.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- konglong87/superPMtheir own version, first seen Mar 27, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- konglong87/superPM★ 84same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository13 other files it gives its agents.
- clean-commitSkill
- context-budgetSkill
- craft-principlesSkill
- debug-circuitSkill
- meeting-driverSkill
- memory-curatorSkill
- output-guardSkill
- plan-firstSkill
- ship-cycleSkill
- simplify-codeSkill
- sprint-flowSkill
- task-resumeSkill
- verify-buildSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 143
Update existing documents rather than creating new versions.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
PM Docs
Turn conversations and code into structured product documents. Bridge the gap between what's being built and why.
Document Types
PRD (Product Requirements Document)
Generate when: user is defining a new feature or product.
# PRD: [Feature Name]
## Problem Statement
What user problem does this solve? Who has this problem? How painful is it?
## Proposed Solution
High-level description of the solution. Not implementation details — user-facing behavior.
## User Stories
- As a [persona], I want [capability], so that [benefit]
## Requirements
### Must Have (P0)
### Should Have (P1)
### Nice to Have (P2)
## Success Metrics
How will we know this worked? Specific, measurable criteria.
## Scope
### In Scope
### Out of Scope
## Dependencies
External teams, services, or decisions this depends on.
## Timeline
Milestones and target dates (if provided).
## Open Questions
Unresolved decisions that need answers before or during implementation.One-Pager
Generate when: user needs to communicate an idea quickly to stakeholders.
# [Title]
**Status:** Draft | In Review | Approved
**Author:** [name]
**Date:** [date]
## TL;DR
2-3 sentences. What are we doing and why.
## Context
What's happening that makes this relevant now?
## Proposal
What specifically are we proposing?
## Impact
Who does this affect? What changes for them?
## Effort
T-shirt size estimate (S/M/L/XL) with brief justification.
## Risks
What could go wrong?
## Next Steps
Concrete actions with owners.Decision Log
Generate when: a significant technical or product decision is made during a session.
## Decision: [Title]
**Date:** [date]
**Status:** Decided | Revisit by [date]
**Context:** Why did this decision come up?
**Options Considered:**
1. [Option A] — pros, cons
2. [Option B] — pros, cons
3. [Option C] — pros, cons
**Decision:** [Which option and why]
**Consequences:** What this means going forward.Launch Checklist
Generate when: user is preparing to ship or deploy.
# Launch Checklist: [Feature/Release]
## Pre-Launch
- [ ] All acceptance criteria verified
- [ ] Security review complete
- [ ] Performance testing done
- [ ] Documentation updated
- [ ] Rollback plan documented
- [ ] Monitoring and alerts configured
- [ ] Stakeholders notified of launch timeline
## Launch Day
- [ ] Deploy to staging, verify
- [ ] Deploy to production
- [ ] Smoke test critical paths
- [ ] Monitor error rates for 30 minutes
- [ ] Announce launch internally
## Post-Launch
- [ ] Monitor metrics for 24 hours
- [ ] Collect initial user feedback
- [ ] Address any P0 issues immediately
- [ ] Schedule retro for day 3-5Rules
- Generate documents from context — don't ask 20 questions first. Fill in what you know, mark unknowns as
[TBD]. - Match the formality level to the user's context. Solo founders need lightweight docs. Enterprise teams need thorough ones.
- Store generated documents in a
/docsor/decisionsfolder in the project if one exists. - Update existing documents rather than creating new versions. Documents are living artifacts.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

