plan-first
Skill0 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Requires a written plan — requirements, scope, acceptance criteria — before any implementation begins.
11 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- cathyzhang0905/agent-cockpittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- fvkmizel/soulkeepertheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Hvftpie13/Flashmind_Gemini-3.8-Flash_Smart-agenttheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- AndrewBrown-USDA/aigb-skills-usdatheir own version, first seen Oct 31, 2026
- randommonicle/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- nadavnaveh/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
Other versions11 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 11
- duncan-buildroom/freeskills★ 65same name
- hongshuxifan321/plan-first★ 43same name
- Hvftpie13/Flashmind_Gemini-3.8-Flash_Smart-agent★ 39same name
- randommonicle/claude-skills★ 27same name
- AndrewBrown-USDA/aigb-skills-usda★ 7same name
- dfedoryshchev/weftworks★ 5same name
- nadavnaveh/skills★ 2same name
- cathyzhang0905/agent-cockpit★ 0same name
- fvkmizel/soulkeeper★ 0same name
- justomsharma/github-resume-assistant★ 0same name
1 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository13 other files it gives its agents.
- clean-commitSkill
- context-budgetSkill
- craft-principlesSkill
- debug-circuitSkill
- meeting-driverSkill
- memory-curatorSkill
- output-guardSkill
- pm-docsSkill
- ship-cycleSkill
- simplify-codeSkill
- sprint-flowSkill
- task-resumeSkill
- verify-buildSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 22
Before writing any code, produce a plan with these sections:
- Distinctive: line 29
Ask clarifying questions if requirements are ambiguous — do not guess
- Distinctive: line 54
No step should take more than ~50 lines of code
- Distinctive: line 58
Do NOT skip the plan for "simple" tasks.
- Distinctive: line 60
If the user says "just do it" or "skip the plan," acknowledge their preference but still produce a brief 3-line summary (requirements, …
- Distinctive: line 61
If requirements change mid-implementation, pause and update the plan before continuing.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Plan First
You MUST create a plan before writing any implementation code. This is non-negotiable.
When This Skill Activates
This skill applies whenever the user requests code generation, feature implementation, bug fixes, or refactoring that involves more than a single-line change.
The Planning Protocol
Before writing any code, produce a plan with these sections:
1. Requirements
- Restate what the user wants in your own words
- List explicit requirements from the request
- List implicit requirements you've inferred (and flag them as inferred)
- Ask clarifying questions if requirements are ambiguous — do not guess
2. Scope
- Files that will be created or modified
- Dependencies that need to be added
- External services or APIs involved
- What is explicitly OUT of scope
3. Approach
- High-level architecture or design decisions
- Why this approach over alternatives (briefly)
- Known risks or trade-offs
4. Acceptance Criteria
- Concrete, testable conditions that define "done"
- Written as "Given X, when Y, then Z" where possible
- Include edge cases worth testing
5. Implementation Steps
- Ordered list of discrete steps
- Each step should be independently verifiable
- No step should take more than ~50 lines of code
Rules
- Do NOT skip the plan for "simple" tasks. Simple tasks have simple plans. Write them anyway.
- Present the plan to the user and WAIT for approval before proceeding.
- If the user says "just do it" or "skip the plan," acknowledge their preference but still produce a brief 3-line summary (requirements, approach, done-when) before coding.
- If requirements change mid-implementation, pause and update the plan before continuing.
- Reference the plan in commit messages: "Implements step 3 of plan: add auth middleware."
What a Good Plan Looks Like
A plan is good when someone who wasn't in the conversation could read it and implement the feature correctly. It is bad when it restates the user's request with no additional structure or insight.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

