ship-cycle
Skill0 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Enforces the full dev cycle — branch, plan, implement, test, review, commit — with no skipped steps.
In this repository13 other files it gives its agents.
- clean-commitSkill
- context-budgetSkill
- craft-principlesSkill
- debug-circuitSkill
- meeting-driverSkill
- memory-curatorSkill
- output-guardSkill
- plan-firstSkill
- pm-docsSkill
- simplify-codeSkill
- sprint-flowSkill
- task-resumeSkill
- verify-buildSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
17 rules. About 0 are common, 15 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈15
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Distinctive: line 14
Every feature, fix, or refactor follows the complete shipping cycle.
- Distinctive: line 20
Create a feature branch from the latest main/develop
- Very specific: line 21
Use conventional naming: feat/, fix/, refactor/, docs/
- Distinctive: line 22
Never work directly on main
- Very specific: line 26
Follow the plan-first protocol (see plan-first skill)
- Distinctive: line 27
If plan-first is not installed, produce at minimum: requirements, approach, acceptance criteria
- Distinctive: line 31
Write code in small, reviewable increments
- Distinctive: line 33
Follow existing project conventions (indentation, naming, file structure)
- Distinctive: line 34
Do not introduce new patterns without flagging them
- Distinctive: line 38
Write or update tests for every behavioral change
- Distinctive: line 39
Run the existing test suite before considering implementation complete
- Distinctive: line 40
If no test framework exists, at minimum verify the change manually and document how
- Distinctive: line 45
Check for: security issues, unnecessary complexity, missing error handling at boundaries, hardcoded values
- Distinctive: line 56
If a step fails, do not skip to the next step.
- Distinctive: line 57
If tests fail, do not commit.
- Distinctive: line 58
If you realize mid-implementation that the plan was wrong, go back to step 2.
- Distinctive: line 59
Document any deviations from the plan in the commit message.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Ship Cycle
Every feature, fix, or refactor follows the complete shipping cycle. No shortcuts.
The Cycle
1. Branch
- Create a feature branch from the latest main/develop
- Use conventional naming:
feat/,fix/,refactor/,docs/ - Never work directly on main
2. Plan
- Follow the plan-first protocol (see
plan-firstskill) - If plan-first is not installed, produce at minimum: requirements, approach, acceptance criteria
3. Implement
- Write code in small, reviewable increments
- Each increment should compile/run without errors
- Follow existing project conventions (indentation, naming, file structure)
- Do not introduce new patterns without flagging them
4. Test
- Write or update tests for every behavioral change
- Run the existing test suite before considering implementation complete
- If no test framework exists, at minimum verify the change manually and document how
5. Review
- Self-review the diff before committing
- Check for: security issues, unnecessary complexity, missing error handling at boundaries, hardcoded values
- Flag anything you're uncertain about to the user
6. Commit & PR
- Atomic commits with conventional commit messages
- PR description includes: what changed, why, how to test, screenshots if UI
- Link to related issues if they exist
Rules
- If a step fails, do not skip to the next step. Fix the failure first.
- If tests fail, do not commit. Fix the tests or the code.
- If you realize mid-implementation that the plan was wrong, go back to step 2.
- Document any deviations from the plan in the commit message.
Escape Hatches
- Hotfix mode: User says "hotfix" — compress to: implement, test, commit. Still no skipping test.
- Prototype mode: User says "prototype" or "spike" — compress to: branch, implement, commit. Mark the branch as experimental.
These modes must be explicitly requested. Default is always the full cycle.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

