agentleFS
NVIDIAKnown publisherNVIDIA/NeMo-Relay/.agents/skills/draft-release-notes/SKILL.md

draft-release-notes

Skill238 starsChanged 2 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Compare NeMo Relay release refs and draft the current documentation release-notes page from verified repository evidence. Do not use for GitHub Release bodies or ordinary feature documentation.

9 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Run the read-only helper with explicit release refs and the target minor version:

    line 13
  2. Distinctive:

    Run the helper. It reports an absent prior release-notes directory without failing, which is expected for early release branches.

    line 30
  3. Distinctive:

    Verify each candidate claim in the changed public docs, API types, command help, or source before including it.

    line 32
  4. Very specific:

    Update docs/about-nemo-relay/release-notes/index.mdx unless the release changes its route or navigation entry.

    line 35
  5. Distinctive:

    Run the helper for the target release and, when useful, an early branch without release notes.

    line 47
  6. Distinctive:

    Check product names, commands, package names, support claims, and links against the current repository before handing off the draft.

    line 55

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Draft Release Notes

Draft the current documentation release-notes page from verified repository evidence. Keep complete, PR-by-PR release history in GitHub Releases.

Gather Evidence

Run the read-only helper with explicit release refs and the target minor version:

python3 .agents/skills/draft-release-notes/scripts/collect_release_evidence.py \
  --previous release/<previous-major>.<previous-minor> \
  --current HEAD \
  --version <major>.<minor>

The report verifies both refs, compares their release-notes trees, identifies version text currently present in those pages, and groups commits into review candidates. Treat the groups as an evidence index, not publication-ready copy.

Workflow

  1. Confirm the target release version from the release branch and package metadata. Preserve unrelated working-tree changes.
  2. Run the helper. It reports an absent prior release-notes directory without failing, which is expected for early release branches.
  3. Verify each candidate claim in the changed public docs, API types, command help, or source before including it. Prioritize breaking changes, migrations, user-visible features, and ongoing support limitations.
  4. Update docs/about-nemo-relay/release-notes/index.mdx unless the release changes its route or navigation entry.
  5. Preserve the page's current structure: release summary and highlights, compatibility or migration notes, known issues, previous-release link, and related topics. Use tables or callouts only when they improve the existing page.
  6. Preserve MDX front matter and the JSX SPDX comment. State the full history is available in GitHub Releases; do not create a changelog or GitHub Release body from this skill.

Validate

Run the helper for the target release and, when useful, an early branch without release notes. Review public claims, then run:

git diff --check
just docs

Check product names, commands, package names, support claims, and links against the current repository before handing off the draft.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.