agentleFS
NVIDIAKnown publisherNVIDIA/NeMo-Relay/skills/nemo-relay-plugin-adaptive-tuning/SKILL.md

nemo-relay-plugin-adaptive-tuning

Skill238 starsChanged 2 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Use this skill when baseline NeMo Relay instrumentation exists and the user wants to configure or evaluate adaptive plugin behavior, including telemetry, state, adaptive_hints, tool_parallelism, ACG, hint consumption, or measured rollout.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Steady: 0 new projects took it in the last 4 weeks, none the 4 weeks before.thin data

Week of Sep 13: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 20: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 27: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 4: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 11: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 18: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 25: 0 new projectsWeek of Nov 1: 0 new projects
Sep 2026Oct 2026Nov 2026
New projects taking a version of this file each week, over the 8 weeks our latest run read: only 0 in all, so this is a hint, not a trend.

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

19 rules. About 0 are common, 16 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈16

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill when a user has baseline NeMo Relay instrumentation and wants to improve latency, parallelism, prompt-cache behavior, or …

    line 13
  2. Distinctive:

    Keep adaptive behavior measured against a known baseline.

    line 16
  3. Very specific:

    Do not use this skill when the application is not instrumented yet.

    line 20
  4. Distinctive:

    Use the adaptive plugin component rather than inventing separate tuning logic or hand-registering adaptive behavior at every call site.

    line 27
  5. Distinctive:

    Start with in-memory state and telemetry-only behavior for local development.

    line 29
  6. Distinctive:

    Add active behavior only after representative runtime events show what should change.

    line 32
  7. Distinctive:

    Use this rollout sequence:

    line 54
  8. Very specific:

    Read references/config.md when exact plugin configuration fields are needed.

    line 61
  9. Distinctive:

    Run representative traffic and inspect reports or runtime events.

    line 62
  10. Distinctive:

    If configuration validation fails or expected events are absent, return the diagnostics and stop.

    line 63
  11. Distinctive:

    Before enabling scheduling, verify tool idempotency and race behavior.

    line 65
  12. Very specific:

    Read references/hints.md when application logic consumes adaptive hints, tool-parallelism guidance, or ACG diagnostics.

    line 68
  13. Distinctive:

    Do not enable scheduling before tool idempotency and race behavior are known.

    line 76
  14. Distinctive:

    Do not enable prompt-cache planning before provider payloads are stable.

    line 77
  15. Distinctive:

    Do not treat adaptive hints as mandatory instructions unless the consuming path explicitly defines that contract.

    line 78
  16. Distinctive:

    Do not use environment variables as the primary adaptive configuration model.

    line 80
  17. Distinctive:

    Do not tune from a single run or unrepresentative traffic.

    line 81
  18. Distinctive:

    Do not suppress or replace original tool and model errors.

    line 82
  19. Distinctive:

    Do not add retries until the call owner defines their safety.

    line 83

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Tune Adaptive Plugin Behavior

Use This When

Use this skill when a user has baseline NeMo Relay instrumentation and wants to improve latency, parallelism, prompt-cache behavior, or model-request behavior from runtime signals. Keep adaptive behavior measured against a known baseline.

Do Not Use This When

Do not use this skill when the application is not instrumented yet. Start with nemo-relay-instrument-calls or nemo-relay-get-started first.

Default Guidance

  • Observe first, compare against a baseline, then enable one behavior change at a time.
  • Use the adaptive plugin component rather than inventing separate tuning logic or hand-registering adaptive behavior at every call site.
  • Start with in-memory state and telemetry-only behavior for local development.
  • Move to persistent state only when learned signals must survive restarts or be shared across workers.
  • Add active behavior only after representative runtime events show what should change.

Embedded Adaptive Model

  • Adaptive behavior is configured through the first-party plugin component with kind adaptive.
  • Adaptive requires existing NeMo Relay scopes and at least one relevant managed tool or LLM lifecycle event stream because it learns from runtime signals.
  • Main configuration areas are state, telemetry, adaptive hints, tool parallelism, Adaptive Cache Governor (ACG), and rollout policy.
  • State backends are in_memory and redis.
  • Tool-parallelism modes are observe_only, inject_hints, and schedule.
  • Adaptive Cache Governor providers are passthrough, anthropic, and openai; omit ACG until prompt-cache planning is needed.
  • Helper APIs exist in Rust nemo_relay_adaptive, Python nemo_relay.adaptive, and Node.js nemo-relay-node/adaptive. Go and raw FFI are source-first or advanced surfaces.

Default Path

Use this rollout sequence:

  1. Confirm the app emits scope events and the managed tool or LLM events needed for the behavior being evaluated. Do not require both call types when the workflow uses only one.
  2. Capture a baseline for the workflow you want to improve.
  3. Enable adaptive telemetry with in-memory state.
  4. Read references/config.md when exact plugin configuration fields are needed.
  5. Run representative traffic and inspect reports or runtime events.
  6. If configuration validation fails or expected events are absent, return the diagnostics and stop. Keep the last known working configuration active.
  7. Before enabling scheduling, verify tool idempotency and race behavior. Before enabling ACG, verify that provider request payloads are stable.
  8. Enable the smallest behavior change in config.
  9. Read references/hints.md when application logic consumes adaptive hints, tool-parallelism guidance, or ACG diagnostics.
  10. Compare results against the baseline. If latency, correctness, or failure rate regresses, restore the last known working configuration and retain the sanitized diagnostics for review.

Failure Modes To Avoid

  • Do not enable scheduling before tool idempotency and race behavior are known.
  • Do not enable prompt-cache planning before provider payloads are stable.
  • Do not treat adaptive hints as mandatory instructions unless the consuming path explicitly defines that contract.
  • Do not use environment variables as the primary adaptive configuration model.
  • Do not tune from a single run or unrepresentative traffic.
  • Do not suppress or replace original tool and model errors.
  • Do not add retries until the call owner defines their safety.
  • Revert adaptive behavior when it increases the failure rate.

Load A Reference When

  • You need the exact adaptive config shape -> references/config.md
  • You need to consume adaptive hints or scheduling guidance in app logic -> references/hints.md

Use Another Skill When

  • You need to build reusable plugin behavior instead of configuring the built-in adaptive component -> nemo-relay-plugin-build

Related Skills

  • nemo-relay-get-started
  • nemo-relay-instrument-calls
  • nemo-relay-plugin-observability
  • nemo-relay-plugin-build

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.