agentleFS
NVIDIAKnown publisherNVIDIA/NeMo-Relay/skills/nemo-relay-instrument-typed-wrappers/SKILL.md

nemo-relay-instrument-typed-wrappers

Skill238 starsChanged 2 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Use this skill when adding NeMo Relay typed wrappers, domain types, or provider codecs while preserving JSON middleware semantics and caller-visible behavior.

1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill when an application wants stronger domain types than raw JSON for tool or LLM integration.

    line 11
  2. Distinctive:

    Keep typed boundaries explicit so middleware still sees predictable JSON.

    line 13
  3. Distinctive:

    Prefer plain JSON first for initial adoption.

    line 17
  4. Distinctive:

    Keep in mind that middleware still operates on JSON, not typed objects.

    line 19
  5. Very specific:

    Use BestEffortAnyCodec only at boundaries where strict schemas are not available.

    line 29
  6. Very specific:

    Use instructions, portable messages and components, and the tagged api_specific request surface for normalized edits.

    line 48

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Use Typed Wrappers And Codecs

Use this skill when an application wants stronger domain types than raw JSON for tool or LLM integration. Keep typed boundaries explicit so middleware still sees predictable JSON.

Default Guidance

  • Prefer plain JSON first for initial adoption.
  • Reach for typed wrappers when the application already has stable domain models.
  • Keep in mind that middleware still operates on JSON, not typed objects.

Embedded Codec Model

  • A typed value codec is a pure boundary translator. It converts application-facing values to JSON before NeMo Relay emits events or runs middleware, then converts JSON back into the framework callback or caller type.
  • Python exposes JsonPassthrough, DataclassCodec, PydanticCodec, and BestEffortAnyCodec. Node.js exposes JsonPassthrough plus custom Codec<T> implementations.
  • Use BestEffortAnyCodec only at boundaries where strict schemas are not available. Prefer dataclass, Pydantic, or explicit Node.js codecs when the framework owns a stable schema.
  • Provider codecs are different from typed value codecs: they normalize provider-specific LLM requests and responses so middleware and subscribers can inspect messages, tools, model names, generation parameters, and response annotations.
  • Built-in provider codecs include OpenAIChatCodec, OpenAIResponsesCodec, and AnthropicMessagesCodec in Python, Node.js, and Rust. Choose the codec that matches the actual provider payload shape.
  • Response codecs annotate LLM end events with fields such as id, model, message, tool_calls, finish_reason, usage, provider-specific data, and extra unmodeled fields. They do not rewrite the caller-visible response.
  • Request codecs run before LLM request intercepts. Intercepts receive both the raw LLMRequest and optional annotated request; encode merges annotated edits back before execution intercepts and the provider callback run.
  • Built-in request codecs guarantee JSON-value identity for an unchanged annotation. They compare edits with a decoded baseline and patch only changed fields, preserving native representation details and unknown fields.
  • Use instructions, portable messages and components, and the tagged api_specific request surface for normalized edits. Provider-only union members use explicit { provider, kind, value } native components. Reserve top-level extra for unknown future fields.
  • The nemo-relay gateway always supplies matching request codecs on Anthropic Messages, OpenAI Chat Completions, and OpenAI Responses generation routes. On those routes, treat raw request.content as read-only and return body edits through the annotated request. Header edits still use the raw request.

Key Rules

  • Typed wrappers are currently a first-class path for Python and Node.js; Rust uses codec traits directly
  • Request/response conversion belongs in codecs
  • Intercepts and guardrails see JSON values after encoding
  • Changes made by middleware survive into the decode step

Choose A Codec

  • JsonPassthrough for JSON-native values
  • DataclassCodec or PydanticCodec in Python when the models already exist
  • Custom codecs for domain-specific wire shapes
  • BestEffortAnyCodec only when broad flexibility is worth the looser contract
  • Provider codecs for LLM provider payloads, not application domain objects conversion

Validation Checklist

  • Codec output is JSON-compatible
  • Required fields survive toJson/fromJson or decode/encode
  • Middleware sees the expected serialized shape
  • Provider codecs preserve fields they do not understand
  • Response codec failures do not break the underlying LLM call
  • Request codec encode preserves original provider fields unless an intercept intentionally changes them
  • Provider-native components belong to the codec's provider surface
  • Gateway generation intercepts do not mutate raw request.content

Related Skills

  • nemo-relay-instrument-calls
  • nemo-relay-plugin-observability
  • nemo-relay-debug-runtime-integration

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.