draft-release-notes
Skill52 starsChanged 28 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Draft TT-Studio GitHub release notes in the house style: study the last one or two published releases for structure and voice, diff the current release branch against the previous release tag/commit, then group the changes into π New Features / π Bug Fixes / π§ Technical Improvements with bold feature names and short descriptions. Use whenever someone asks to "draft a release note", "write release notes for vX.Y.Z", or "make release notes from the rc-vX.Y.Z branch". Delivers the final result as a copyable markdown code block.
9 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- netbox-community/netboxtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- omnigent-ai/omnigenttheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- oyvindwe/connectlife-hatheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- defenseunicorns/uds-coretheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- luxury-yacht/apptheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- rommapp/rommtheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Other versions9 projects use a version of this.
Word for word Β· 0
None found.
Edited Β· 0
None found.
Wrote their own version Β· 9
- jamiepine/voiceboxβ 57ksame name
- netbox-community/netboxβ 22ksame name
- rommapp/rommβ 14ksame name
- omnigent-ai/omnigentβ 11ksame name
- luxury-yacht/appβ 446same name
- oyvindwe/connectlife-haβ 316same name
- NVIDIA/NeMo-Relayβ 238same name
- defenseunicorns/uds-coreβ 201same name
- NVIDIA/NeMo-Fabricβ 73same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (β99% sameβ means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We canβt tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .cursor/rules/ai-models.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/backend.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/docker-deployment.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/frontend.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/general.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/project-overview.mdcCursor rule
- cli-designSkill
- cut-releaseSkill
- feature-branch-prSkill
- license-attribution-complianceSkill
- tt-studio-add-modelSkill
- tt-studio-cliSkill
- tt-studio-debug-bundleSkill
- tt-studio-overviewSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 15
Follow this when asked to draft release notes for a new TT-Studio version.
- Distinctive: line 26
If the user names a branch, use it.
- Distinctive: line 35
Read the most recent two or three published release descriptions so the new one matches their structure and voice:
- Very specific: line 97
If the release PR number is known, link it: #<PR>.
- Distinctive: line 104
Always hand back the final release note inside a fenced markdown code block so it's copy-pasteable verbatim into GitHub.
βCommonβ is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. βVery specificβ is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
TT-Studio Release Notes Drafting
Follow this when asked to draft release notes for a new TT-Studio version. The goal is notes that read exactly like the previous few releases β same sections, same voice, same level of detail β built from the actual changes on the release branch.
Inputs to confirm
- New version (e.g.
v2.9.0) and the release branch (e.g.rc-v2.9.0). - Previous version it ships after (e.g.
v2.8.0). If not given, it's the most recent published GitHub release.
If the user names a branch, use it. Don't guess a version β ask if unclear.
The release PR into main is titled Rc vX.Y.Z (the Lint PR title check is
skipped for rc-* head branches) or release: vX.Y.Z β see CONTRIBUTING β
Release Process. Step 2 relies on that Rc vX.Y.Z merge-commit title as the
cutoff.
Step 1 β Study the previous releases (match the style, don't invent it)
Read the most recent two or three published release descriptions so the new one matches their structure and voice:
# needs no auth:
WebFetch https://github.com/tenstorrent/tt-studio/releasesThe established house style is:
- A header line:
## :rocket: TT Studio <version> is out! - A lead-in:
A few highlights since <previous version>: - Three sections, in this order, each only if it has content:
### π New Featuresβ bold feature name + one-line description### π Bug Fixesβ one line each, past tense ("Fixedβ¦", "Resolvedβ¦")### π§ Technical Improvementsβ internal/infra/CI/refactor/dep bumps
- A closing
Full changelog β <link>line.
Bold-name-plus-description is the signature of the New Features section β keep it. Bug Fixes and Technical Improvements are plain one-liners.
Step 2 β Gather the actual changes
Fetch the release branch and list every commit since the previous release. Each
release's RC merge commit is titled like Rc vX.Y.Z (#NNNN) β the previous
release's merge commit is the cutoff; everything above it is new.
git fetch origin <release-branch>
git log origin/<release-branch> --oneline -60Find the previous release's Rc v<prev> (#NNNN) commit in the list; everything
above it belongs in these notes. Commit subjects are usually descriptive enough
(they're squash-merged PR titles). If a subject is cryptic, inspect it with
git show --stat <sha> rather than guessing.
Step 3 β Categorize
Sort each change into one of the three sections:
- π New Features β user-facing capabilities and additions (new models, new UI, new commands/flags, new workflows). Utilize next heading for model-related updates if this gets too long.
- π€ Model Support (Optional) β if there are too many model-related changes, then things like the addition of new models, progress stuff, deployment improvements, etc go here.
- π Bug Fixes β anything fixing broken behavior. Past tense.
- π§ Technical Improvements β refactors, dependency/artifact bumps, CI, internal plumbing, dev-experience changes not visible to end users.
Judgment calls to make deliberately (and mention to the user afterward):
- Internal output-handling or plumbing changes go in Technical Improvements, not New Features, even when they sound feature-ish.
- Fold several closely related commits into one bullet (e.g. multiple CI additions β one "Added CI: β¦" bullet; several workflow-canvas commits β one "Workflow Canvas Upgrades" bullet with the pieces listed).
- CI-only / internal changes can be bundled or dropped from public notes β offer the user both.
Step 4 β Changelog link
- If the release PR number is known, link it:
#<PR>. - Otherwise use a compare link:
https://github.com/tenstorrent/tt-studio/compare/<prev>...<new>(resolves once the RC merges and is tagged).
Tell the user which one you used and offer to swap in the PR number.
Step 5 β Deliver as a markdown code block
Always hand back the final release note inside a fenced markdown code block so it's copy-pasteable verbatim into GitHub. Do not render it as live markdown.
Then, below the code block, add a short plain-text note of the judgment calls you made (what you grouped, what you moved between sections, which changelog link you chose) and any options you want the user to weigh in on.
Template
```markdown
## :rocket: TT Studio <version> is out!
A few highlights since <previous version>:
### π New Features
- **<Feature Name>**: <one-line description>
- ...
### π Bug Fixes
- Fixed <β¦>
- ...
### π§ Technical Improvements
- <β¦>
- ...
**Full changelog β <link>**
```Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

